different Jesus
From : stormin mormon
Q: first ammendment free speech. tell anyone what you want. -- christopher a. young you cant shout down a troll. you have to starve them. .. you have the right to think you are correct but you do not have the right to tell someone else they are wrong. -- ken .
Replies:
From : beekeep
ezsdnqpc2nnoq1rynz2dnuvzv6tnz2d@comcast.com roy roy@home.net wrote ill take all the blame for this one........ nah your only a rabbit wtf do you know. i know that i aint gonna wreck no more wagons!! g i suppose i can blame you for the pats going on their ass and now the bears. you are a bit of bad luck. vbg roy denny next superbowl whatever team denny picks we all will know which team to go with. remember dont pick the same team denny does. dale thanks for the vote of confidence there ole buddy!!! vbg denny .
From : stormin mormon
how about the guy that was going for a medical checkup and heard he had to have a urine test. carolina watercraft works cooltoys@bellsouth.net wrote whew...thanks. i studied and studied but was still worried. ^ .
From : stormin mormon
roy roy@home.net wrote ill take all the blame for this one........ nah your only a rabbit wtf do you know. i know that i aint gonna wreck no more wagons!! g i suppose i can blame you for the pats going on their ass and now the bears. you are a bit of bad luck. vbg roy denny next superbowl whatever team denny picks we all will know which team to go with. remember dont pick the same team denny does. dale .
From : stormin mormon
yeah like that quote from st. john if you love me.... didnt end with slam all the other ah from other churches and then go out and kill them. -- christopher a. young you cant shout down a troll. you have to starve them. .. he is a classic example of why this world has seen so many wars fought over religion. this sort of attitude does nothing but incite people against each other all in the name of their loving supreme being. .
From : miles
i believe that budd is totally sincere. incidentally baptism is the key to the door of the celestial kingdom. did that almost twenty years ago. temple work is not needed for celestial kingdom. just the highest degree of the ck also known as exaltation. wish youd get your facts straight. -- christopher a. young you cant shout down a troll. you have to starve them. .. on mon 29 jan 2007 114254 -0700 budd cochran mr-d150@preciscom.net wrote so it is ok for you to do what ive been accused of did you even bother to look at the links or is becoming a god too important to you how many church requirements for the celestial kingdom have you acheived temple recommend yet budd come on.........are you for real i mean you cant be. .
From : Annonymous
theguy@whatever.net wrote you whine like a baby whenever anyone says anything against your religion then you have the gall to say absolutely unfair untrue and hateful things about the right of another to have their religion. he is a classic example of why this world has seen so many wars fought over religion. this sort of attitude does nothing but incite people against each other all in the name of their loving supreme being. .
From : budd cochran
as such were done here because you obviously have no clue youve played right into my hands. as if you could tell... i can but i doubt you can. ive made an argument that biofuels must be part of the furture of our energy plan regardless of their emissions levels. this is because of lower production levels of fossil fuels and the accompanying higher prices. by claiming that even the most conservative estimates of fossil fuel reserves are in doubt youve reinforced my argument that alternative fuels such as bio fuels are necessary despite the accompanying problems they bring. thank you for making my point even stronger. good day to you. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote i told you that all of the figures are from the usgs. you denied it and claimed you have newer data. you dont. *all* of your sources are simply grabbing numbers from the usgs and distorting them. what you claimed was *wrong*. what your sources claimed was *wrong*. there was no denial of your source. my info is from more recent sources. you you arent catching on yet are you! your info is *not* more recent. it is *all* from the same source. the difference is that im quoting exactly what the usgs actually did say with *accurate* prespective. you keep quoting source who cite the same usgs report and distort what it says. have no more proof of my sources than i do. simply put all sources are estimates so when citing them you must use the full range. again that wasnt my point to begin with. so you think an estimate by the usgs for in place oil in anwr is appropriate to use for calculating how much oil per day might be pumped during peak production do you really need to be told *again* just how stupid that is the usgs gave figures for ecomonically recoverable oil. those are the numbers that count. they gave the figures explicitely for the 1002 area of anwr. yet you quote sources using technically recoverable oil figures which are meaningless anyway for the entire northeastern corner of alaska and claim they are for anwr. do you really need to be told *again* just how stupid that is however in your rabid bullshit session youve more than eloquently proven my point. that you cant figure out what your sources are what is an accurate perspective on the data or even which data applies to where yes that has eloquently been proven. did you even have a point and no i did *not* say your source was credible. i said they lied and so do you. my sources base their findings on your source. therefore your source following your logic must be lying as well. and then they *lie* about it. so do you. just like that statement. you cant get it through your head that the usgs is not lying but people who base their findings on the usgs report by distorting what they said *are lying*. if i were distorting the report you would of course be able to show exactly what and where the distortion was. you dont even try to do that... because you *know* it wont fly. so instead you lie about it. the distortion is in the fact that the area has been mapped by oil companies as well as the usgs. that is false. show us data. since the oil companies feel there is a reason to go into the anwr they must feel their data is fairly sound and well researched. heh heh... i think you will find that the oil companies arent doing much of *anything* towards opening anwr. they are drilling *no* wells anywhere near anwr. they have virtually all pulled out of funding arctic power anwr.org. recently the state of alaska even tried to sell offshore leases in the waters just north of anwr... and *no* oil companies bid on any of the offerings. as such their findings must be taken with as much weight as the usgs. so show us their findings! we do *not* *know* there is oil in anwr. if the oil companies want to go there then there is oil. its simple economic logic. the oil companies have been drilling in the npr-a since the 1940s and have yet to bring a single field to production. you dont seem to have much understanding of the oil industry. as such were done here because you obviously have no clue youve played right into my hands. as if you could tell... -- floyd l. davidson http//www.apaflo.com/floyddavidson ukpeagvik barrow alaska floyd@apaflo.com .
From : fat ass fred
on fri 9 feb 2007 233700 -0500 stormin mormon cayoung61-&spamblock*-@hotmail.com wrote i have zero wives but someday wish to have all that the law allows. be careful of what you ask for. beekeep .
From : Annonymous
it is out now! jr wants control of dei. im betting she wont go for it. hes outa there imo. roy .