Trouble Codes
From : zram
Q: theguy@whatever.net wrote the whole thing needs to be redone simplified and made more fair. that is what you two should argue for. lets get the pos code written again and done right this time. i agree. it needs to be fair. however tbones concept of fair is anything but. his view is to crush and destroy anyone who has more than his perceived level of enough. .
Replies:
From : zram
i have the above truck with the v6 i want to put in a v8 what are the problems connected with a new engine and will i need a new tranny. just had to get a rebuilt tranny. .
From : chris thompson
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote not trying to impose any beliefs on anyone - just noting that any belief that cannot be proven has to be taken on faith. by definition if it is a belief it is not proven otherwise it is a fact. define proof. what is proof to many is completely ignored by those whos own beliefs are on conflict. for instance theres enough evidence to make a strong case that the earth and the universe is far older than 8000 years or so. wont matter to the faithful. they will never believe any such evidence. it took many decades for religious groups to agree that the earth is round and revolves around the sun and neither is the center of the universe. prior to their eventual acceptance of these facts anyone who differed in their views were told they were flat out wrong with zero possibility of being correct. in many cases they were persecuted for their wrong beliefs. so what happened did religion change to match facts how can religion change .
From : zram
on sun 12 nov 2006 103945 -0800 john kunkel nobody@nowhere.net wrote my beliefs for the most part can be be proven; christianity cant be proven and is strictly based on faith. if you want to live by the tenets of a religion i will gladly tolerate that practice but when you want to interject your beliefs into government i will object. your beliefs can be proven prove that the inherent universal concepts of right and wrong are not instilled by the allmighty. prove that the old testament is wrong. prove that christ was not the son of god and that he did not die to absolve all who believe of the guilt of their sins. you obviously dont understand the concept of burden of proof. the individual making a claim bears the burden of proof so in the absence of physical evodence its up to believers to prove the above. id say you are taking at least as much on faith as the christian is. the new testament is one of the most historically correct and provable peices sic of ancient literature known to man today. the more secular non-religous scholars and investigators dig into it trying to find fault the more they find can be historically proven or substantiated by the other known and accepted historical records. in a word bullshit!!! the bible is chronologically correct in some instances but the only way the spiritual content can be proven is by interviewing the long dead participants. .
From : dave young
or...if anyone has an original i can burn copies for anyone. not to charge but if you send me a cd in a sase or similar i can burn it for you at no charge. -- ------------------------------------------ laszlo almasi ----cool toys formerly carolina watercraft works ----mack daddy trailers ----ice angels do you by chance have one for a 1998 ram or 2000 durango curtis i sent them today via regular mail. i .