T-Boner explains TC losses

From : transurgeon

Q: transurgeon wrote what part of 3% / 2% = 150% is wrong are you still trying to pass of your stupidity as math........ a percentage is a certain proportion of a particular value. it always relies on 100% as the complete value and 0% as the non-existent value. therefore 200% is twice the complete value. to explain this an alloy may be 25% steel and 75% copper. therefore there is 3 times as much copper as there is steel. if an employee had a 200% increase in salary his salary would be 3 times as big. this is because he would have twice the complete value on top of his original salary. must not be able to find any little old ladies to rip off lately....... jerry .

Replies:

From : doc

internal friction what exactly is frictioning how about the fluid both itself as well as its contact with the tc internals. youve got to be kidding me. 50 points to you if you can answer correctly 100 bonus points for explaining the path of the fluid path of the fluid lol now who is trying to change the subject to spin away from error. ill just add that 50 points to the thousands you have already gave me. looks like you cant answer either question. hint the fluid starts in the pan he he he. looks like you dont know wtf you are talking about. as for the friction part please explain how the converter gets hot when under load here is a tip fluid viscosity. as far as the fluid flow he is asking about the flow path inside of the converter such as from the impeller to the turbine thru the stator and back to the impeller.. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : tbone

i know how they work. that is not the issue. what is the issue is that nothing can increase something without producing more of it regardless of the method. so............youre into perpetual motion machines now does proving your ignorance really make you feel good. i said the they produce torque not power therefore perpetual motion has nothing to do with it. however your demonstration of perpetual stupidity really is amazing. this silly ritual of declaring yourself the winner of arguements in the face of overwhelming evidence ot the contrary is getting tiresome hahahahahaha look who is talking. yup im calling you a lying waste of oxygen who spins his ass off when he cant back up what he said iow you are calling my you now i really am insulted. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : transurgeon

internal friction what exactly is frictioning how about the fluid both itself as well as its contact with the tc internals. youve got to be kidding me. 50 points to you if you can answer correctly 100 bonus points for explaining the path of the fluid path of the fluid lol now who is trying to change the subject to spin away from error. ill just add that 50 points to the thousands you have already gave me. looks like you cant answer either question. hint the fluid starts in the pan he he he. looks like you dont know wtf you are talking about. as for the friction part please explain how the converter gets hot when under load here is a tip fluid viscosity. as far as the fluid flow he is asking about the flow path inside of the converter such as from the impeller to the turbine thru the stator and back to the impeller.. wrong again braniac from impeller thru stator to turbine then repeat you just cant help yourself can you .

From : tbone

fair enough but that still doesnt change the fact this particular would fit within the lemon law conditions with the exception to age of the vehicle. yeah... and if my aunt had balls... does she bottom line - vehicle is too old - doesnt qualify under lemon law unless you can find me a state statute that extends lemon law protection to say 7 years and/or 70000 miles. fine. i thing that point has already been more than established. theres no almost qualifies or gee its so close... its black or white. it either does or it doesnt. in this particular case despite to your inference to the contrary it doesnt. is there a particular reason for you being such an asshole i simply said that it followed the general requirements as far as problems and attemps to repair to be covered under the lemon law and it does. i was unaware of specific state lenght of time requirements and thought that they covered the vehicle for the entire length of its warranty. now that i an aware of this limitation i am not arguing the point so what are you whining about. the part is still under warrantee and multiple attempts to repair the same problem have been unsuccessful. we all agree that thats not right and can be addressed through other means. lemon law filings arent one of them. i am not saying that it is. i thought that it could be and now i know different so exactly what additional point are you trying to make i think he was just trying to show how fuckin clueless you are. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .