Starter Solenoid fuse suddenly popping

From : lee

Q: ninebal310 ninebal310@aol.committed wrote from tbone lol what an asshole. and people talk about me. i dont like being an asshole. it is just that i am sick of whinny-ass-wipes complaining about what other people think of them. who really cares what others think anyway he probably doesnt smoke cigars when he gambles cant make a decision without his wife/girlfriend over-ruling his decision and hasa a small dick with no balls. now he comes here pleading dont pick on me because i drive a v-6. does anybody really give a shit what he drives or what i drive for that matter hank thinks he should sell the v-6 and buy some balls. 1 i dont smoke 2 i make my own decisions no one over rules them. 3 my dick is big enough i dont need a v8 to prove it.. same with my balls 4 i wasnt pleading to have people not pick on me. i can hold my own. you are just to stupid to understand the nature of my post. so hank you red neck mother fucker you want me to prove any of this you have gone beyond asshole status in my book and graduated to mean ass mother fucker. i hope you enjoy your new title. its people like you that gets their asses kicked and then wonder why the next day. im done talk to you and reading your crap and its people like you that make me glad that there are kill files on this client. -steve -- ---- knowing others is wisdom knowing your self is enlightenment. -- lao-tzu .

Replies:

From : nosey

if you find a 518 unit consider yourself lucky or well financed. beyond that all the stuff you want to do is better off done as the trans was designed. your rear ratio if you had od on would be 2.44 which would suck fuel like a nut on start up. at this website http//www.transmissioncenter.net/dodge.htm go to the bottom of the page and youll find all sorts of info on doing the trans swap you want to do. it has details on how to make the trans shift correctly. my second question ill probably replace the timing chain sometime in the next year or so mainly as preventative maintenance but also to tighten things up. replacing the timing chain in a van is a royal pain in the ass. but if you plan to do it making a cam swap isnt a bad idea. however without knowing the cam specs i cant tell you if you would have an advantage or not. if you decide on a cam swap dont get to wild a cam as the pcm may not be able to cope with a big jump. 1. msd ignition plus a high-output coil & 8.0 or 8.5 mm ignition wires. i wouldnt bother with a new ignition system. just put a set of good quality plug wires on it. 2. headers with a crossover tube and dual exhaust. a major pain in the ass but likely the best source of more power and economy particularly for the dollar spent. this and the trans swap are the things id do. 3. aftermarket port fuel injection system. bad idea all around and certainly not worth the trouble and effort if you plan to keep the engine basically stock. next two will probably increase power & performance possibly at the expense of mpg. headers will gert you both power and mpg particularly if you drive conservatively as you say you do. also im reluctant to boost the power too much on a 120k engine lest something else break. nothing you mentioned will harm a 120k engine. max life liberty and the pursuit of any jackass that threatens it. embellished usnavy slogan .

From : roy

on sat 18 dec 2004 030548 gmt jerry jlrice1655@earthlink.net wrote denny wrote well dont shoot a damned bowling ball itll just piss ya off....... vbg and cost ya a couple of lunches... ill keep that in mind. speaking of cost ya you see rugers new super redhawk in 454 casull with only a 2 1/2 inch barrel. says it packs a wallop and im sure it does but to whom or what...... check it out. http//www.shootingtimes.com/handgunreviews/rgrrh/ jerry umm... anything you point it at... within 5 feet would be my guess.. after 5 or 6 feet you might as well just close your eyes and shoot.. *g* that sucker looks like fun!! bg and im guessing you got the range accuracy about right too. i did notice they were only comparing it to other .44/.45 caliber rounds and not the .50 s&w. if you want another handful check out the model 500 in the 4 or 8 3/8 barrel on the s&w site. i think both will bring a grin to your teeth. that sucker looks like it might brake your friggin wrist!! but it would be fun to fire. to big for concealed carry though imho. roy aka p w for one more day g hey!! ya want miami straight up bfg denny .

From : lee

im having a great day but steve apparently knows less than he claims if he doesnt know the truth about the slant sixes. also much of his other info is dead wrong or just plain biased. v-8s for example have an inherent problem with getting a dead smooth idle...the firing order itself. he for some reason overlooks that little fact. and as you know i am never impressed by people that wave degrees around like a boy hawking papers. show me real knowledge of the topic and ill listen. steve didnt. merry christmas. -- budd whats the difference between a bad golfer and a bad skydiver one goes whack darn and the other goes darn whack. on fri 17 dec 2004 034709 gmt budd cochran mr-d150@citlinkspam.net wrote sorry jerry but his lack of knowledge on many points does not impress me. youre not having a good day budd.. you take your meds .

From : tbone

on fri 17 dec 2004 042903 gmt tbone t-bonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote once again you show your ignorance. all three are in parallel since they all leave from the same place on the intake and all return directly to the water pump. you do know the definition of parallel dont you that depends on design and varies from vehicle to vehicle. really name one modern vehicle where this is not the case. better yet name one chrysler product where this is the casr since the op is talking about a dodge. the only thing the bypass is directly in parallel with is the thermostat. the bypass hose is not to provide an alternate route for coolant to bypass the heater core it is to provide for circulation when the thermostat is closed. no shit sherlock. nice just very nice. a walk down memory lane. i havent heard that used for years. nice come back tom if you are in junior high. but then you may be. try telling that to your buddy budd. but the heater circuit is still in parallel with the radiator and the bypass. sorry to dissapoint you moron ooops the name calling in leiu of facts defense. you are done. lol no but you are and once again you had better talk to your buddy budd. .

From : roy

once again you show your ignorance. all three are in parallel since they all leave from the same place on the intake and all return directly to the water pump. you do know the definition of parallel dont you that depends on design and varies from vehicle to vehicle. the only thing the bypass is directly in parallel with is the thermostat. the bypass hose is not to provide an alternate route for coolant to bypass the heater core it is to provide for circulation when the thermostat is closed. sorry to dissapoint you moron ooops the name calling in leiu of facts defense. you are done. max life liberty and the pursuit of any jackass that threatens it. embellished usnavy slogan .

From : tbone

the heater core coolant lines and the bypass are in parallel with each other no they are not. the only thing in parallel with the bypass hose is the thermostat hence the name bypass hose. once again you show your ignorance. all three are in parallel since they all leave from the same place on the intake and all return directly to the water pump. you do know the definition of parallel dont you do you know the art of metal casting not all are in parallel idiot. resorting to name calling already. this is a primary indicator that your argument has no foundation. all three leave the same chamber of the intake manifold and if you think differently prove it and they all return directly to the water pump. this is the definition of parallel budd but keep digging yourself in its getting hard to see you now. you began the name calling long before anyone else in the entire group you just get whiney when it comes back and bites you. and not all manifolds are made the same. but at least i know what the bypass actually does. no you dont. yes i do but feel free to expalin it to us. ok expalin is actually spelled e-x-p-l-a-i-n. oh and you dont know crap idiot. pounding your fists like a angry child and resorting to spelling errors and typos now. another sigh that you are both wrong and know it. no its sigh youre too egotistical to check your spelling or words usage .. . or just to lazy and stupid. since it is in the lower hose it can feed heat to both the engine and radiator regardless of the position of the thermostat. the part you dont seem to get is most block heaters that heat the coolant do not go in the radiator hoses since thats too large a volume of water to get moving via convection with that small a heater. they use the heater hose and can be plumbed into the block via the drain plug/cock below the cylinder bank. you say this as if i actally cared what you think. unless you can use the word all instead of most and then back it up you are just full of shit and trying to start trouble a usual. it is not my block heater and i never saw it. the op says thats where it mounts and was concerned by the amount of heat that it generated and i said that was normal. budd mentioned the need for the thermostat to be open for it to work and i asked him a simple question. he could have simply answered it like a man but also as usual chose a different course. i responded to it in a still much nicer tone than his and now here you are and also wrong imagine that. ah . . .the truth will out . . .look at your first sentence in this paragraph translation to english at no extra charge you say this as if i actally actually cared what you think. more hiding behind typos lol. but this is a valid point. when someone tries to be accurate even if i dont always agree with them like tom denny mac and others like that i do care but when people like you and max come up with your all so typical bs and spin why should i. i guess that the same could be said about me but i at least admit to when i am actually wrong. you admit an error not since ive been in this group. post a link to support your claim. me i have witnesses . . . the typo corrections are so others can read your diahrretic crap without straining. this sums up your whole problem tommy-boy. you dont care what anyone thinks especially if they are having to correct one of your errors. there is a big difference between errors and different ways of doing things and when im wrong i admit to it. when have you tommy-boy youre going against witnesses that have also commented on youre refusals to admit error. and those corrections were given not from different ways of doing things but from errors in mechanical knowledge. big diffierence. this is why you are rude crude and socially unacceptable why youre disliked / hated by some and why you dont find the acceptance you try to force eveyone to give you. i am only rude and crude to those who act that way toward me and even then i am no where near as childish as you are. no youre much worse. and do you really want someone to back into the archives and prove you wrong the sad part is you dont even respect yourself enough to try be accurate in your answers. lol just because you dont agree does not mke me wrong. you have been wrong in our arguments far more times than i have and i admit when i am. just because you dont care if youre correct make you right either and why is it you get corrected more than anyone else if you are correct more often methinks youve deluded yourself. for you to insist on it being the radiator hose shows your ignorance of not only the plumbing but of engine heaters. sorry to dissapoint you moron but i never insisted any such thing. the op said that is where it was and was supposed to be installed and since i neve

From : lee

leakdown test on a diesel without spark plug holes i didnt think of that til after i mentioned it in the original post. you remove the injector. a bit more involved than just yanking a spark plug but not too difficult on a 12v. .