Short avi clip of me fucking a goat. Enjoy
From : mac davis
Q: daniel j. stern wrote on wed 13 oct 2004 steve wrote pick your badness! do you want the brake tail and turn signal functions all lumped into one lamp which can give only one signal at a time and if it fails you lose all functions on that side badness my 69 has 3 lamps per side actually. built-in redundancy. problem solved. halfassedly. if it fails you lose all functions on that side problem solved. can give only one signal at a time problem unsolved. if all a surrounding driver can see is one side or the other and you are stepping on the brakes and signalling for a turn or lanechange in the direction of the only rear lamp he can see all he sees is your blinker not your brake light.half the problem solved. and so how should one respond differently to a blinker or a brake either one means this car is slowing down so its pretty much a moot point especially since both rear lamps and the chmsl are going to be simultaneously visible 99% of the time. otoh seeing amber in limited visibility conditions implies approaching vehicle which is flat-out false in the case of amber rear turn signals. meaning you have to rely on simultaneously seeing headlamps or taillamps to resolve that ambiguity. youre just trading one ambiguity for another and id argue that the signal or brake ambiguity isnt particularly dangerous since you should assume that the car is slowing to a near-stop at least under either condition. the fact of the matter is that both systems work perfectly well both have done so for over 50 years and i think youd be hard-pressed to find a statistically different number of collisions based on the color of the rear turn signals except for the duelling reds design you mentioned before. thats your open invitation to prove me wrong. - .
Replies:
From : roy
on 16 oct 2004 203422 -0700 bill.negraeff@cballiance.com bill negraeff wrote by outside the law i dont mean against the law. this administration has mastered the black arts of a. deceiving without lying and b. defying the spirit of legislation without violating the letter of the law proof that will come on november 2. you are evading the question typical liberal tactics. your reply has no substance much less specific examples. john z kerry president t-bone steak houses the facts i have stated could easily be corroborated by you if you had any intellectual curiosity at all. but i dont care what you think - you can spit them out choke on them or swallow them - as you please. well how liberal of you bill. what a fellow you must be. .
From : mac davis
on fri 15 oct 2004 200957 -0400 johnnyg abiigdog@hotmail.com wrote my drink holder latch is broken as well i got the two pieces of the drink holder apart just held by little plastic tabs but i cant figure out how the latch goes back together. wonder if there is an exploded view of that drink holder somewhere anyone know where something like that would be jg as a 99 ram owner the idea of an exploded view of that useless cupholder is very appealing... got any c-4 .
From : denny
hey roy is this true you might be a democrat if... i still think my idiot is the better choice. your idiot scares me every time he opens his mouth.g roy .
From : steve carolinabreezehvac
my drink holder latch is broken as well i got the two pieces of the drink holder apart just held by little plastic tabs but i cant figure out how the latch goes back together. wonder if there is an exploded view of that drink holder somewhere anyone know where something like that would be jg .
From : tenfold
unlike the core values of a conservative that has him opposed to social change unless it benefits himself //rant flushed/// ah yes i recall now social change is the liberal 60s hippie culture flag word for anything goes and the hell with accepted societal norms. thank you for reminding me. john z kerry president t-bone steak houses where anything goes we love the 60s hippie culture .