Replace headlamp bulbs on 2000 Dakota Quad 4x4?

From : leythos

Q: aw the clueless max armed with a little bit of knowledge and ready to lead the fuel world. sure some stuff is unfit for humans and made into animal feed or fertilizer. but i gues that does not matter either. again many sources of biodiesel are byproducts that are unfit for consumption. do i need to repeat again or will you be drinking fryer oil generally false. we cannot place our entire future in either ethanol or biodiesel. however we can reduce emissions that contribute to global warming reduce dependance on oil foreign or domestic and reduce the costs of fuel overall by diversifying our sources. as such three major benefits can be had from bio fuels. this really says nothing at all pure jiberish. you will not reduce co2 emission with ethanol you will make it worse and biodiesel will make nox worse too and diesel are already big nox generator making about 5 to 5 times as much nox per mile as a gas truck. reducing co isnt an issue trees do that. reducing co is an issue and nothing is proven to handle that better than changing fuels. nox emissions are being reduced with new technology; particulates and co2 have not. however simply by changing fuel two out of four major emissions concerns are reduced by nearly 50%. iow its worth the change despite what your uninformed opinion claims. they have gotten away

Replies:

From : leythos

nosey wrote you have the right to think you are correct but you do not have the right to tell someone else they are wrong. sure ya do! people tell other people they are wrong all the time with absolutely no dilution of their basic freedom of speech rights. it would be a rather ineffective congress if members held their tongues when they thought a fellow member held an incorrect opinion! smh .

From : nosey

on sun 04 feb 2007 042155 gmt max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote aw the clueless max armed with a little bit of knowledge and ready to lead the fuel world. sure some stuff is unfit for humans and made into animal feed or fertilizer. but i gues that does not matter either. again many sources of biodiesel are byproducts that are unfit for consumption. do i need to repeat again or will you be drinking fryer oil again narrow minded and not looking at big picture generally false. we cannot place our entire future in either ethanol or biodiesel. however we can reduce emissions that contribute to global warming reduce dependance on oil foreign or domestic and reduce the costs of fuel overall by diversifying our sources. as such three major benefits can be had from bio fuels. this really says nothing at all pure jiberish. you will not reduce co2 emission with ethanol you will make it worse and biodiesel will make nox worse too and diesel are already big nox generator making about 5 to 5 times as much nox per mile as a gas truck. reducing co isnt an issue trees do that. reducing co is an issue and nothing is proven to handle that better than changing fuels. nox emissions are being reduced with new technology; particulates and co2 have not. however simply by changing fuel two out of four major emissions concerns are reduced by nearly 50%. iow its worth the change despite what your uninformed opinion claims. your realy are clueless tree will not do it not only because we male far more on it than they can remove but there are less of them every year as they are cut down for building materail and rain forest is being cleared away at record rates. i can see you are one of these head in the sansd guys that does not beleive that man is the cause or that there is a seriuos problem. i gues california is full of s$!% to because they passed alaw a while back limiting co2 emissions for industry and vehicles and other states are considering them too. detriot is fighting it vigorously they will loose because it will mean a end to the hp wars and force them to make vehicles truely more efficent and kinder to environment. if it was left to short sighted people such as you it would get even worse. the reality is we are slow cooking ourslfs and even if we stop making co2 today it will take 20 or 30 years for it to start to decline but but limiting it today we can slow the rate of rise and lessen the peak impact it will have over time or we can do it your way and rape and burn the earth. they have gotten away with it in the past but not much longer. if you want to reduce dependance on imported oil you have to reduce consumption as well big time. false. we all have seen the reports on north slope reserves and gulf of mexico finds. further weve got unstudied regions such as those west of florida and other offshore areas. go one step further with the increased price and demand of fuel it follows that it is more economically viable to explore and drill in places formerly thought economically unfeasable. again classic head in the sand. you talk before you read the fine print . if all the oil on the north slope could be used as once there is about a 6 month supply of it for us needs that is it period. with the gulf it is likely even less than that. se politicains and oil companies that promote this as a solution for people such as yourself never tell you what it equals in days of potentail oil supply. to someone such as yourself a find of even a potenail one billion berrels sound like a answer to our need but the reality is that this is less than a years supply at current need levels because oil is not converted to usable fuel gallon for gallon and a lot is converted to other products such as fertilized and plastics and such that we use daily. john q public does not want to here this though so it is nver talked about. right now we import over 50% or our oil and by 2020 the doe say we will be importing 80% or more. it is pure foolishness to continue as we are using as much as we can and just look for more sources to rob to pay for it. while true its plain that we have domestic sources that could supplant the foreign sources. our domestic source are long passed their peak capacity and are in decline because of our thirst for oil we have wasted a lot of it. the us has less than 5% of the world population but uses more than 25% of the oil in the world also the us has the honor of being the only major power in the world that uses far more oil than we produce. the real reason we went into iraq was for the oil make no mistake about it because iraq is basically tied with russia for the second largest proven reserves of oil in the world with saudi arabia first. had there been no oil we would not have been there but current admin will never tell you that. watch food prices in next 3 to 5 year if more biofuels are made because you will pay