P0442

From : joe

Q: just got back in from pushing four inches of wet shit. i gotta say im impressed with those goodrich revos i got last spring. this was one of those snows that was almost slush but the pavement frozen by the time ya backed up to take the next swipe. im sure those blizzaks are a better snow tire but these do damned good for a year -round tire. now off to find the perfect tree.. denny thats good to know. i havent bought anything yet but the revos are shorter money and you say they work ill have to look at them. serious question. how much weight do you have in back we have snow falling now should be a 4total. monday night they are talking about a big storm 6+. dont cut down your neighbors shrub.g roy .

Replies:

From : joe

119. tom lawrence dec 4 526 pm show options from tom lawrence tnloaswpraemnmcie...@earthlink.net - find messages by this author date mon 05 dec 2005 002631 gmt local sun dec 4 2005 526 pm subject re accident report reply | reply to author | forward | print | individual message | show original | report abuse how many states have laws against cell phone usage while driving ny and nj for starters... iow not enough states . . yet. 1st degree murder there too why not if you know its against the law to talk on the cell while driving you seem to be advocating a capital sentence 1st deg. murder for pretty much anyone who takes the life of another while in the act of something they know is prohibited - regardless of intent. lets take another example - straight from my local paper the other day id rather not. . . a worker was doing some work in a company parking lot overnight. he dug a good-sized hole about 5 feet deep. he failed to mark it off. an employee arrived to work early the next morning and while walking across the parking lot fell into the hole. now she was injured - but for the sake of argument lets say she was killed. the worker knew that a hole like that was a danger to others right is he now guilty of 1st degree murder no idea as this is not thescenario i was talking about. ever been driving and fighting to stay awake yep and i even fell asleep at the wheel but i didnt hit anyone and it was also before my change in attitude about some vehicular laws. so with how you feel now had you hit someone back then you should have been executed as a murderer that happened back when i was a bleeding heart liberal. me neither but how many un-enforcible laws are there now too damn many... but thats a whole nother discussion is it with everyone asking my opinion on other situations i was thinking it was part and parcel of the discussion. so - work a double shift doze off at the wheel cause an accident somebody dies... get thrown in the gas chamber lol all you guys keep switching the conditions . . . .all i was talking about was deliberately getting drunk and then driving. cant anyone stay on the subject besides me i think thats part of the point... you change the way one particular scenario is treated - others have to follow. why i dont consider all crimes to be the same level of evil. to say i do with the evidence given is pure conjecture at best defamation at worst. youre making the argument that a person who causes the death of another while engaged in an activity that is illegal should be guilty of murder in the 1st degree. no i said anyone that deliberately gets drunk and kills someone should be counted guilty that includes murder by knife gun baseball bat wet noodle. . . . if youre saying that only drunk driving falls under this well that begs the questions put forth here ie. why isnt doing xxx just as bad as dui no it doesnt except in a liberal world. how are the above scenarios different than driving with an elevated bac a lot but no one sees it but me. im trying to understand. im not trying to bust your balls budd... sorry tom but thats not how its coming across. im just discussing it with an admittedly different viewpoint than yours. heck - if we all have the same views about everything it would be pretty boring agreed but when you start changing the original topic into something unrelated then you arent discussing . . youre ball busting. im done discussing it. many of you alreadty consider me to be over the edge so its nothing new. im not one of them. i find your views on this particular subject a little extreme perhaps - but that doesnt make you a nut. i suspect theres something more significant thats caused you to view this as you do but if youre not going to talk about it im not going to ask. tom i will give the reason too often a drunk gets away vehicular homicide because of his intoxication impairment. too often drug dealers get too light of sentences because they plea bargain out of what they deserve. too many times drive-by shooters are rationalized out of a death sentence because of psychological problems. the list is endless and the criminals just go to prison and learn how to be better criminals. its time to take a stand. budd .

From : wrench007 via carkb com u14318 uwe

joe wrote the evaporative emission control system leak code is back. already replaced the gas cap and cleared the code but it came back after a couple days. did this twice now. any suggestions on where to look beyond the gas cap tia. joe 03 dakota 5.9 r/t cc 93 mustang 5.0 lx hatch with a few goodies is this the 03 dakota 5.9 r/t cc yes. is the new cap aftermarket brand new oem cap from dealer. does the lip of the gas filler neck look damaged or rusted not at all. looks perfect. i even wiped it clean with a clean shop rag. vapors are escaping...these vapors are routed through hoses solenoid valve and a leak detection pump. you can visually inspect the rubber vacuum hoses and plastic black lines under the hood from the fuel tank and under the vehicle for cracks and wear also look at the gas tank return fuel lines and filler tube for signs of leaking fuel. thanks will do. you can have a smoke test performed at a shop but with this code usually a thorough visual inspection will find the fault --j this happened a while ago and they did the smoke test and found the bad cap. replaced it problem gone for months. now its back. replacing the cap with the new oem unit from the dealer didnt help so its either a bad cap unlikely or something else. i will check the hoses etc. joe 03 dakota 5.9 r/t cc 93 mustang 5.0 lx hatch with a few goodies .