OT....Ping..Roy
From : denny
Q: good. i didnt think you would resort to insults. if i had there wouldnt be any question.g but i think the discussion is over anyway. yup it was going nowhere. nice chatting roy. merry christmans. same to you and yours. budd roy .
Replies:
From : denny
yup if the lever is doing that its a problem in the column. the power may be down because the pcm sees this recurring event and doesnt know where its coming from. -- max there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author thanks for the help all! yup the actual gear lever is physically down into 2nd. dont know how it gets there but when im freaking out on the freeway and i reach down to change it back to d i am able to do so and all is well again till it decides to do it again. so it may be mechanical but there has also been a noticeable loss of power/acceleration in the truck too. so im taking it in tomorrow morning and see what that gets me. the key code thing is a bit odd too. yet something else for them to look into. bev .
From : denny
just got back in from pushing four inches of wet shit. i gotta say im impressed with those goodrich revos i got last spring. this was one of those snows that was almost slush but the pavement frozen by the time ya backed up to take the next swipe. im sure those blizzaks are a better snow tire but these do damned good for a year -round tire. now off to find the perfect tree.. denny thats good to know. i havent bought anything yet but the revos are shorter money and you say they work ill have to look at them. serious question. how much weight do you have in back about 1000 lbs total. 400 over the rt rear wheel well to offset the rest of the weight in the drivers seat... 400 pounds is not anywhere near enough to offset the weight of your fat ass!! bfg there i beat ya to it!! bg seriously 400 lbs of jd suitcase weights in the front of the bed. if it gets really deep ill put another 500 lbs of sand tubes behind the wheel wells. just a thought for ya. if you move the 400 lbs of weight behind the rear wheels you probably wont need the other 500lbs. roy .
From : denny
how many states have laws against cell phone usage while driving ny and nj for starters... 1st degree murder there too why not if you know its against the law to talk on the cell while driving you seem to be advocating a capital sentence 1st deg. murder for pretty much anyone who takes the life of another while in the act of something they know is prohibited - regardless of intent. lets take another example - straight from my local paper the other day a worker was doing some work in a company parking lot overnight. he dug a good-sized hole about 5 feet deep. he failed to mark it off. an employee arrived to work early the next morning and while walking across the parking lot fell into the hole. now she was injured - but for the sake of argument lets say she was killed. the worker knew that a hole like that was a danger to others right is he now guilty of 1st degree murder ever been driving and fighting to stay awake yep and i even fell asleep at the wheel but i didnt hit anyone and it was also before my change in attitude about some vehicular laws. so with how you feel now had you hit someone back then you should have been executed as a murderer me neither but how many un-enforcible laws are there now too damn many... but thats a whole nother discussion so - work a double shift doze off at the wheel cause an accident somebody dies... get thrown in the gas chamber lol all you guys keep switching the conditions . . . .all i was talking about was deliberately getting drunk and then driving. cant anyone stay on the subject besides me i think thats part of the point... you change the way one particular scenario is treated - others have to follow. youre making the argument that a person who causes the death of another while engaged in an activity that is illegal should be guilty of murder in the 1st degree. if youre saying that only drunk driving falls under this well that begs the questions put forth here ie. why isnt doing xxx just as bad as dui how are the above scenarios different than driving with an elevated bac a lot but no one sees it but me. im trying to understand. im not trying to bust your balls budd... im just discussing it with an admittedly different viewpoint than yours. heck - if we all have the same views about everything it would be pretty boring im done discussing it. many of you alreadty consider me to be over the edge so its nothing new. im not one of them. i find your views on this particular subject a little extreme perhaps - but that doesnt make you a nut. i suspect theres something more significant thats caused you to view this as you do but if youre not going to talk about it im not going to ask. .
From : cbhvac
just got back in from pushing four inches of wet shit. i gotta say im impressed with those goodrich revos i got last spring. this was one of those snows that was almost slush but the pavement frozen by the time ya backed up to take the next swipe. im sure those blizzaks are a better snow tire but these do damned good for a year -round tire. now off to find the perfect tree.. denny thats good to know. i havent bought anything yet but the revos are shorter money and you say they work ill have to look at them. serious question. how much weight do you have in back we have snow falling now should be a 4total. monday night they are talking about a big storm 6+. dont cut down your neighbors shrub.g roy ya know...400lbs of rabbit...that would feed a small country in africa for a week. smartass.......... bg denny .
From : roy
first degree requires intent and most drunk drivers dont get in their vehicles with the intent to kill someone however im in agreement with you that the punishment should be severe. lol tom there are thousands of ads everyday giving the dangers of operating a vehicle under the influence . . now just how many people over 12 do you think have never seen or heard about those dangers and there are those same adds talking about the dangers of smoking and they are also ignored. people only see what they want to see. the point tom is that if you ignore break/ think it applies only to other people the law you are a criminal. there are no laws concerning smoking and driving. i agree 100% but the punishment has to fit the crime. being an idiot and getting someone killed is not the same thing as going out with the intent to kill for whatever reason. if you know you plan to get drunk it is not being an idiot its intended with forethought. letting yourself get drunk when you let your friends buy youjust one more you show a lack of responsibility because you probably let it happen before. as for the smoking i was referring to people only seeing what they want to see not that there was a law against it. as do you. youre only seeing what you want to see in this thread. since the knowledge is well brodcast ignorance is no excuse. if the dui / dwi knows hes going out to get drunk then he knows he could kill someone by driving in that condition. if you know its a crime and you know you could kill and decide to get wiped out anyway then as far as im concerned its a concious decision and you have decided the value of the life of another person or persons is of no importance. and that says you though about it and decided to do it. the sad thing is that it is never this black and white. actually it is. if you drive drunk you break the law. period. if you kill knowing youre doing it you break the law. if you refuse to pay your taxes you break the law. again im in full agreement but we are talking about the specifics of murder 1 not just breaking the law. isnt murder 1 breaking the law the only reason for there being any gray areas is liberal defense lawyers but then they created the civil double jeopardy lawsuit didnt they now this makes you sound either ignorant or bitter budd. name calling tom im neither. life itself is a gray area and if you just dole out punnisshment without understanding or compassion you might as well be saddam because that is exactly what he did. comparing me to saddam now are we too bad you arent where i could deck you for that insult. there are some that think that they can drive as well or better drunk others that accidentally have 1 too many and dont really feel drunk and neither of these types know that they could kill somebody because as far as they are concerned they can drive just fine and then it is not a conscious choice that they devaluated human life. tom i did not say accidentally i said knowing they would be getting drunk . . .big difference. what i wrote was a statement of a deliberate thought out act. are trying out the part of a liberal defense lawyer now keep your spins out. there is no spin here budd. yes you are ignoring what i say and substituting your words. how can you prove that the person knew that they would get drunk. i used to drink and i knew before i took each first drink i was going to drink either just before or many hours before. btdt tom. alcohol affects different people differently just like any other drug and while some may know that they had too much at ..081% blood alcohol another may not feel it at all and have no idea yet by your judgment they both go to jail for life or are executed for the crime. does this really make much sense to you yep but your liberalism wont let it make sense to you. they were wrong and stupid but were not going out with the intent to kill and therefor cannot be accused of murder 1. actually anyone that drinks to the point of 0.08 bac or more is impaired the military navy told my son that if he had more than 3 beers in a week he was to seek counseling. does that give you an idea of how serious it is tom do you drink my heavy drinking days are behind me now and i dont drive while drinking although in my younger days that was not always the case. same here except i no longer drink. no desire to and im on medications that turn deadlyt when combined with alcohol not for others me. a .08 bac does not effect everyone in a fully detrimental way as at one time it was .1 before they realized that there was a significant portion of the population that was still incapacitated there and they needed to lower it. tom you know less than you think about alcohol. one beer or one shot is enough to make measurable differences in 99% of the human populat
From : denny
thanks for the help all! yup the actual gear lever is physically down into 2nd. dont know how it gets there but when im freaking out on the freeway and i reach down to change it back to d i am able to do so and all is well again till it decides to do it again. so it may be mechanical but there has also been a noticeable loss of power/acceleration in the truck too. so im taking it in tomorrow morning and see what that gets me. the key code thing is a bit odd too. yet something else for them to look into. bev .
From : roy
pick pick pick!!!! are you not a mind reader you have to feel sorry for mechanics at that shop when people like this show up!! - lorne usually they bring the vehicle with them. g roy replace it. if anyone could tell me how to replace that cable i would greatly appreciate it. thanks if someone could tell us what kind of vehicle you have that would be greatly appreciated too. .
From : mike simmons
you are correct i misunderstood what he was saying. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving tbone wrote hahahahaha you are kidding right!!! if this was a purly moral world full of completely honest people i might agree but if you believe that to be true... hell a few months ago a man was released from prison after serving 7 years for a rape he didnt commit cleared by dna evidence and it was found that the prosecutor had such evidence that could have cleared him and suppressed it. it looks like your prosecutor led the jury away from the actual conclusion here so are you also saying in your typecast bs that conservatives are also liars. tbone you misunderstood. max didnt try to say one was good and the other bad or ones right and the other wrong. the defense tries to create multiple possibilities which in turn creates reasonable doubt in the juries minds. the prosecution tries to lead the jury towards just one line of thought. lawyers are liars from either side but they are still as max stated liberal defense and conservative prosecution. .