OT: E85
From : azwiley1
Q: ok here is one for all the experts in here what would happen if you attempted to run e85 in a non flex-fuel non-e85 capable vehicle ill guess that your service engine soon light would come on and youll have hesitation/surging when driving. it may be a little hard to start cold too. hows that for some wild ass guessing denny would it be the same if i ran blended wabbit hehe .
Replies:
From : bigironram
bigironram wrote it wasnt headed over a cliff was it unfortunately not. two actions are always associated with north dallas women 1 s i g h head shaking 2 cha-ching not necessarily in that order. - craig c. .
From : jon r pickens
tbone wrote once again you are unable to answer even a simple question. i did many times. people should be able to make what their abilities allow them. which of course means nothing. you have yet too define how much can anyone be able to actually make rather than just being in a position to simply take it. why is that miles perhaps because you are in somewhat of a similar position and your greed will be seen for what it is and nothing more. youve been two-faced on the matter. not at all. your extreme bias simply doesnt allow you to see the difference. on one hand you blast them like crazy say they need to be taxed higher prevented from making more than some magical amount called enough etc. it has nothing to do with either magic or punishment and the fact that you are unable to even define enough shows your pure greed and complete lack of concern for anything else but yourself. the simple thing is that if you want to take the most then you pay the most and if you take so much that society becomes unable to function then you pay until it does. if you dont want to get what you think as screwed on your taxes then pay your workers a living wage and the need for those taxes will drop accordingly. and as an added bonus the demand for your and other companies services will grow as well allowing you to make even more money and with a lower tax burden. it really is funny that you greedy pricks cant see that. on the other hand you have stated you do not want limits imposed on how much someone can make even though your wishes would have exactly that effect. as i said your bias does not allow you to see the difference. oh really. and what exactly is the issue it intended to solve according to you the issue is to prevent people from making more than enough. what are you even talking about your creative editing has removed all meaning from this statement. you cant say tax everything higher that costs more than x $s. why not because of the following. it has to be a higher tax on higher priced items in a given market. a $200000 car should be taxed higher than a $200000 house. and where exactly would these dividing lines take place. would the rich then further corrupt it be defining classes of cars where a high line economy car would be taxed higher than a low line mega-luxury car lol!! i agree with you but also feel that it would be far to complicated to implement and be far to subject to corruption. a higher tax simply based on price alone would hurt people of all income brackets for the reason above. i think that any form of it would be harmful since the rich dont actually spend anywhere near what they take and it would once again put the biggest burden on those that can afford to support it the least. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .
From : jon r pickens
check for a plugged catalicticsp converter if it has one. si stormin mormon wrote 87 dodge van. 318 engine. 145k miles. four barrel carb. slows and only goes about 20 mph. with gentle throttle. flooring it causes it to die completely. after doing this for awhile slows and dies. restarts after a couple minutes restarts easier with a squirt of ether. then drives for another hundred feet or so. problem is intermittent. two weeks ago had the problem. so i added drygas and filled the tank. it was fine for about two weeks. did it again yesterday had to call a tow truck to get me home. today i checked the fuel delivery put a paper napkin over the high side line coming off the fuel pump. run the startter and the paper napkin soaked right through with gasoline. changed the fuel filter its starting to rain. its good and wet out there. ive heard an assortment of theories. but there are some really good mopar experts on this group. what comes to mind in terms of problems and repairs .
From : craig c
well theres your proof that you seek but are you responsible enough to admit what youve done you ran off a christian with your intolerance. if clare is a christian then why did she he include the following quote in many of her his posts my belief if it is so.............. sounds more like someone who argues for the sake of arguing rather than someone who is defending her his christianity. mouth on this one. ive seen budds postings many times in the past. just that i dont know him personally. as for intollerance budd would have to be extremely intollerant to be worse than a good number of the posters on this topic who are totally intollerant of the christian viewpoint. examples remove my name and abot 3 others fromthe list of those who have posted on the subject and youve pretty well got the list. i dont have a dodge truck anymore so i dont really have a horse in this race anyway so good bye. im out here. well again clare.......examples. not accusations but provide some examples of your statement. who has been totally intollerant of the christian viewpoint that is a pretty clear statement im just asking for some proof. -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com .
From : bigironram
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote on thu 16 nov 2006 001145 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote on wed 15 nov 2006 172522 -0500 clare at snyder.on.ca wrote on wed 15 nov 2006 015542 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you sure have made some strange statements then considering that you dont know him and have not read what he has written. like the one about how many of the members here are more intolerant than budd. how do you come to make that sort of statement without admittedly.......by you you dont even know what has been said or written honestly kind of sounds like your ass over loaded your mouth on this one. ive seen budds postings many times in the past. just that i dont know him personally. as for intollerance budd would have to be extremely intollerant to be worse than a good number of the posters on this topic who are totally intollerant of the christian viewpoint. examples remove my name and abot 3 others fromthe list of those who have posted on the subject and youve pretty well got the list. i dont have a dodge truck anymore so i dont really have a horse in this race anyway so good bye. im out here. now watch the posts from budd start appearing. i swear its the same person. bob .
From : craig c
a vehicle designed to run on gasoline will indeed lose power and fuel economy when ran with e85. however an engine designed to take advantage of that high octane rating can indeed match the power and fuel economy of the average gas-motor if not exceed it. saab has an engine thats calibrated to take advantage of the higher octane rating of e85 and in fact makes more power with it than gasoline. jp id like to see some information on that got a link compression ratio can be raised to extreme levels around 141 on engines run exclusively on alcohol but then theyre not flex fuel anymore. the fuel economy claim is also interesting. i know on alcohol converted carbureted engines use huge jets compared to gasoline engines. it would be interesting to see what technology has come up with recently. .
From : jon r pickens
god can no more be disproven than proven bible thumpers are annoying & atheist are assholes... eod .
From : bigironram
suddenly without warning tom lawrence exclaimed 11-nov-06 147 pm hotter. is my steering loose or something more ominous is this something a layperson can fix themselves how many clunks if its just one clunk per direction and you have a 4x4 id suspect the track bar joint first. 4x4 but multiple clunks. jmc .
From : craig c
suddenly without warning craig c. exclaimed 11-nov-06 1021 am on nov 10 538 pm jmc nogroupss...@nojodibody.homeus wrote jhcoos i know it will probably come to me after i send this but ... i know what jhcops stands for. whats the o in your acronym - craig c. oops i cant spell. its jhcoas. whats the p stand for in yours jmc .
From : craig c
azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote in speaking of vets my step-daughter i have two who is currently in the box gets home near the end of the month! its an illegal war and i hope she gets her box filled a few times. bush is a lyin stinkin prick. -- kyle o reply address is fake. dont ask for the real one a troll named lookout sent enough spam and viruses that i shut it down. .
From : azwiley1
suddenly without warning clare at snyder.on.ca exclaimed 11-nov-06 930 am on fri 10 nov 2006 105518 -0800 john kunkel nobody@nowhere.net wrote ok since this seems to the real issue lets look at it. . . . i hold the view and belief in the literal interpretation of the bible and it is the inerrant and inspired word of god and this is the right view to have. all other views are wrong. will you tolerate my view only if you can prove the existence of god and the validity of the bible. generally with the exception of the extreme fundamentalist you will find the christian more tolerant of the beliefs of others than you will find others to the beliefs of christians. they the christian may tell you you are wrong but will accept you regardless. the atheist or non christian whether islamist jew or humanist tells the christian he is wrong ridicules him and demands not to be exposed to anything or subjected to anything that smacks of or reminds him of christianity. why is it that of todays nations the most tolerant are those where christianity has been historically the predominant belief system as a christian ill tolerate your view whatever it is. i wont necessarily agree with you - but ill let you believe whatever you like as long as it does not infringe upon the rights of others whether that be myself as a christian or anyone else. you dont need to prove anything to me. can you say the same actually yes. im not particularly religious well not in the mainstream sense but i strongly believe in your right to believe however you want to. also i think youre stereotyping a bit. not all atheists ridicule those who believe in a god neither do the others you mention. of course there are those that do just as there are christians that will tell me im going to hell because i dont follow their particular mode of worship. also bud is a christian and isnt tolerant of anyone elses beliefs... christian buddhist druid whatever. you have the right to your beliefs. you can even believe im going to hell i dont particularly mind since i know im not. certainly someone probably millions of someones out there believes youre going to hell because you dont believe as they do - does that mean you are probably not. none of us will know whos right until we die. and depending on your particular belief maybe not even then. jmc a logical female that can make cc cookies..... this is getting scary. vbg denny .
From : chris thompson
suddenly without warning denny exclaimed 11-nov-06 111 pm suddenly without warning clare at snyder.on.ca exclaimed 11-nov-06 930 am on fri 10 nov 2006 105518 -0800 john kunkel nobody@nowhere.net wrote ok since this seems to the real issue lets look at it. . . . i hold the view and belief in the literal interpretation of the bible and it is the inerrant and inspired word of god and this is the right view to have. all other views are wrong. will you tolerate my view only if you can prove the existence of god and the validity of the bible. generally with the exception of the extreme fundamentalist you will find the christian more tolerant of the beliefs of others than you will find others to the beliefs of christians. they the christian may tell you you are wrong but will accept you regardless. the atheist or non christian whether islamist jew or humanist tells the christian he is wrong ridicules him and demands not to be exposed to anything or subjected to anything that smacks of or reminds him of christianity. why is it that of todays nations the most tolerant are those where christianity has been historically the predominant belief system as a christian ill tolerate your view whatever it is. i wont necessarily agree with you - but ill let you believe whatever you like as long as it does not infringe upon the rights of others whether that be myself as a christian or anyone else. you dont need to prove anything to me. can you say the same actually yes. im not particularly religious well not in the mainstream sense but i strongly believe in your right to believe however you want to. also i think youre stereotyping a bit. not all atheists ridicule those who believe in a god neither do the others you mention. of course there are those that do just as there are christians that will tell me im going to hell because i dont follow their particular mode of worship. also bud is a christian and isnt tolerant of anyone elses beliefs... christian buddhist druid whatever. you have the right to your beliefs. you can even believe im going to hell i dont particularly mind since i know im not. certainly someone probably millions of someones out there believes youre going to hell because you dont believe as they do - does that mean you are probably not. none of us will know whos right until we die. and depending on your particular belief maybe not even then. jmc a logical female that can make cc cookies..... this is getting scary. vbg denny oh im sure *someone* will show up here soon and tell me how illogical i am jmc .