OT Bush
From : roy
Q: just curious .
Replies:
From : roy
tom lawrence wrote i know this is a dumb question it certainly is - because you expect us to know what kind of vehicle you have. if you include your year/make/model it ceases to be a dumb question. whoops forgot that didnt i. 1996 dakota v8 auto .
From : tripper
9dodgefan wrote but simply asking someone to consider what i believe is not intolerance and vice versa for anyone asking me to consider different beliefs. thats what its all about. if you want others to be tolerant of you then you must extend that same tolerance to others. mutual respect for each others beliefs. thats whats not happened here and why so many are ticked off. .
From : max dodge
thanks dave i guess that will just be another minor replacement. but does anyone know what this p1740 code is or what problems it has. found this tsb after a extremely short google search. 46re transmission mil due to dtc p1740 - tcc or od solenoid performance http//dodgeram.info/tsb/2000/21-11-00.htm -- ---------------------------- -chris 05 ctd 06 liberty crd real trucks dont need spark plugs. .
From : max dodge
i have a 1999 dodge ram p/u with 90k miles on it. about 3 months ago i noticed at times when i used the dimmer for the head lights sometimes i would hit the head light for high beam and the lights would switch off. i could switch back to low beams and all was ok. if i went back to the high beams the headlights would go to high beams. this happens once out over about ten times. now the blinkers may blink 4 or 5 times and just quit. turn them off and go back on and they may work 1 - 7 or 8 times and quit. is the blinkers switch in the column going bad if so how hard is it to replace .
From : tbone
dave young wrote not sure about the p1740 but the p0138 is a bad o2 sensor the one after the catalytic converter. napa cost is about $72.00. mine was a pain to remove 1999 ram 1500. my 02 sensor socket just wanted to strip it. i finally intentionally broke off the sensor to the hex and used an impact socket and impact wrench. came right off. used anti-seize on the replacement. zram wrote i have a 2000 dodge ram 1500 with a 360 and some trouble codes. the check engine light is on all the time for the last couple weeks. i have got a dtc like p1740 which i have looked up to be the tcc or tranny soilnoid. i was wondering what this means and how to fix it and how expensive it would be then i recently got the code p0138 which i looked up to be a o2 sensor circuit high voltage bank 1 sensor 2. i was wondering what this means and how to fix it and how much it would cost so anyone with any info would be nice. thanks thanks dave i guess that will just be another minor replacement. but does anyone know what this p1740 code is or what problems it has. .
From : max dodge
which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... at least kerry was in country. well i guess pretty soon gw will be too. sorry roy... i entered the usmc in 69 and will never forget how kerry betrayed those of us who were serving. you must be a bit younger than me. i was m-vacd from nam in 66. are you talking about his anti war bit what i find odd is that you single out kerry as the who betrayed us. id offer westmorland as one who screwed a few guys. hell the list is endless. the truth hasnt come out yet about kerrys service but when it does there will be a whole lot of folks enjoying the taste of crow. he betrayed his country and his fellow servicemen and for that i can never forgive him. imho there is no comparison between bush and kerry...... none!! you are correct there is no comparison. kerry served in country and bush didnt show up for much of anything. with bushs approval @ 31% i figure im in good company. roy mike not really the same but if you want to think so thats fine. roy . 222 325344 8sr5h.5410$ya1.3670@02.roc.ny not sure about the p1740 but the p0138 is a bad o2 sensor the one after the catalytic converter. napa cost is about $72.00. mine was a pain to remove 1999 ram 1500. my 02 sensor socket just wanted to strip it. i finally intentionally broke off the sensor to the hex and used an impact socket and impact wrench. came right off. used anti-seize on the replacement. zram wrote i have a 2000 dodge ram 1500 with a 360 and some trouble codes. the check engine light is on all the time for the last couple weeks. i have got a dtc like p1740 which i have looked up to be the tcc or tranny soilnoid. i was wondering what this means and how to fix it and how expensive it would be then i recently got the code p0138 which i looked up to be a o2 sensor circuit high voltage bank 1 sensor 2. i was wondering what this means and how to fix it and how much it would cost so anyone with any info would be nice. thanks .
From : roy
today i tryed stabbing the brakes real hard at 50mph. the tires locked... but on the third stop from 50 mph they had faded really bad. earl on sun 12 nov 2006 162026 gmt earl groce egroce@mindspring.com wrote ive replaced all the fluid while replacing all the brakes... did not use a hp brake fluid. ive read about bedding the pads before and was doing the bedding process.. after about the 4th stopping cycle i essentially had no brakes.. have not tried them today. earl on sun 12 nov 2006 104217 -0500 nosey kfrei43@removethis.hotmail.com wrote earl groce wrote i own two 92 dakotas. one is a 3.9 5spd 232k poor brakes lots of brake fade. other is a new to me 92 4x4 auto with a 360 i installed.. it has new rotors new calipers new autozone top of the line pads i put new shoes on her yesterday. i also has poor brakes willnot slide the wheels.. lots of brake fade. is there a secret to having decent brakes on a 92 dakota earl have you bled the brakes lately do you know about bedding new pads read http//www.zeckhausen.com/bleedingbrakes.htm and http//www.zeckhausen.com/beddinginbrakes.htm .
From : roy
yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. unfortunately there is plenty of documentation to support clintons claim of having tried to do something about bin laden. kerry was never president so you cannot fault him for something he never had a chance to do and kennedy falls into the same category. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor ya know it baffles me why republicans keep pointing to this guy as a defense for bush or any other republican. seriously mike wtf i hate kennedys assinine politics and his rhetorical rants and the fact that he is a jackass on many levels. but really after what 30 friggin years republicans are still measuring how well their guys do against this bar im sorry i expect a bit more than better than ted kennedy out of any office holder. and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... yup agreed on all counts. now when will both parties figure out but especially the reps at this point that using lame excuses of well the other guy didnt do so well isnt getting the job done i respect your opinion 99% of the time but this crap of we only have to do better than the jackass over there is why the country is going to hell. bush sucks and its not because kerry sucks or kennedy swims or gore has clean air farts its because bush sucks. when junior dumped powell his admin went in the shitter. when he dumped ronald dumbsfeld his admin took the best turn in a long while. calling up dads advisors couldnt have hurt. -- max you misunderstand the crux of my post. im not saying bush is better because clinton/kerry/kennedy are bums whuch they are!. im just saying that bush at least had the balls to do something rather than sit on his as and pontificate. its easy to sit on ones ass and armchair quaterback. coulda shoulda is an easy game to play and it seemed to become increasingly popular in the last election cycle. those who derive glee from the results of the election will soon find their joy turned to horror as tradiional american values are discarded in the interest of the pc crowd and their supporters who are poised to assume control of this countrys legislature. yall may be happy with the future i for one am not. and thats all im gonna say about that... adios mike join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author lol and this is our militaries commander and chief. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving was reading about our presidents next trip. hes off to viet nam. couldnt get him there during the war but i guess he figures with veterans day and all he might as well show up. yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... sheesh! mike .
From : max dodge
you misunderstand the crux of my post. im not saying bush is better because clinton/kerry/kennedy are bums whuch they are!. im just saying that bush at least had the balls to do something rather than sit on his as and pontificate. its easy to sit on ones ass and armchair quaterback. coulda shoulda is an easy game to play and it seemed to become increasingly popular in the last election cycle. 1 bush wasnt the only one to do something clinton worked on the issue as well 2 the something that bush did was too late as has been documented by numerous sources. 3 the something that bush did after hitting the taliban was misguided and assinine. 4 coulda shoulda was played in regard to iraq well before the actual invasion. bush coulda shoulda done better and his military advisors agree with that statement. when the military uses its right of free speech and publishes statements opposing the administration; when generals testify before congress opposing the administration; when congressmen who are dyed in the wool military and veterans themselves start opposing the administration its well past coulda shoulda and into heres yer sign. im a conservative democrat. i did not vote for kerry. i stated that iraq was a mess before bush sent troops in. i predicted that n. korea would be a bigger problem. i stated that iraq was in terms of how to deal with them would be better off under a predictable jackass than under a wavering democracy. despite all that i figured bush was the best choice in 2004. but because of all that i knew he wasnt the best our country has to offer. he has proven that in astounding clarity. those who derive glee from the results of the election will soon find their joy turned to horror as tradiional american values are discarded in the interest of the pc crowd and their supporters who are poised to assume control of this countrys legislature. yall may be happy with the future i for one am not. i blame the results of this election directly on the republican disregard for reality particularly george w. bush. in my district we elected a conservative democrat to replace the traditional american values don sherwood who had a five year affair with a sloppy mistress. at some point he choked her and she retaliated by filing a $5.5 million lawsuit. he settled out of court for $500k awarding the bulk of the cash after the election so she would keep quiet. if this is the traditional american values that the democrats will do away with i support their cause. rick santorum was voted out as well. santorum had a history of taking conservatism to fascist levels. it is one thing to support family values it is quite another to condemn a person for anything not found in the catholic value system. santorum made no secret of his hatred yeah thats right of gays. however its a well known fact that gay men are generally conservative in their daily lives and particularly with their real estate and business ventures. communities have been known to actively invite gay men to buy land as they keep it well and their businesses thrive because they run them well. sadly the republicans took the family values to levels that failed to take into account that most americans dont give a damn about what the neighbor does in his bedroom. and thats all im gonna say about that... sorry to hear that since youve generally got good stuff. on this however youve missed exactly what most republicans have.... american values dont include the hatred of americans. all kidding aside this has to be one of your better posts on the subject. one that i totally agree with. roy max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. unfortunately there is plenty of documentation to support clintons claim of having tried to do something about bin laden. kerry was never president so you cannot fault him for something he never had a chance to do and kennedy falls into the same category. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor ya know it baffles me why republicans keep pointing to this guy as a defense for bush or any other republican. seriously mike wtf i hate kennedys assinine politics and his rhetorical rants and the fact that he is a jackass on many levels. but really after what 30 friggin years republicans are still measuring how well their guys do against this bar im sorry i expect a bit more than better than ted kennedy out of any office holder. and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in
From : beekeep
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote not the point. why does everybody get bent out of shape because someone talks about christian values if they espouse the same values themselves not saying you do but many do. it is because they dont want to admit there may be a god and that he might be relevant today and that perhaps they may be wrong forget that the values preceded christianity by something like 4000 years they did not precede god. there have been numerous gods throughout the worlds history. many of those religions lasted far longer than the rather young christianity. did these gods of these long lost cultures exist they vanished when these cultures vanished and new religions began. each new culture brings with it a new religion claiming it is the only correct one. its possible in another 1000 years some new religion culture and gods will be created just as has happened in our history. .
From : mike simmons
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote prove that the inherent universal concepts of right and wrong are not instilled by the allmighty. prove that the old testament is wrong. prove that christ was not the son of god and that he did not die to absolve all who believe of the guilt of their sins. youre asking for proof against your beliefs in an attempt to prove them right. my neighbors 4 year old has an invisible friend she plays with. since nobody can prove this invisible friend doesnt exist it therefore must per your logic nobody is attempting to prove you wrong. they are your beliefs. it is when you attempt to impose your beliefs onto others that the tolerance stops. keep your beliefs where they belong...with you. .
From : joe
the connector they are covered and a just figured they were the same color as those of the o2 sensor. thanks ill check. no those wires refer to the factory wires up to the connector. the wires on the o2 sensor could be in any order. youll need to peel back the factory loom to find the correct wire. .
From : mike simmons
yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. unfortunately there is plenty of documentation to support clintons claim of having tried to do something about bin laden. kerry was never president so you cannot fault him for something he never had a chance to do and kennedy falls into the same category. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor ya know it baffles me why republicans keep pointing to this guy as a defense for bush or any other republican. seriously mike wtf i hate kennedys assinine politics and his rhetorical rants and the fact that he is a jackass on many levels. but really after what 30 friggin years republicans are still measuring how well their guys do against this bar im sorry i expect a bit more than better than ted kennedy out of any office holder. and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... yup agreed on all counts. now when will both parties figure out but especially the reps at this point that using lame excuses of well the other guy didnt do so well isnt getting the job done i respect your opinion 99% of the time but this crap of we only have to do better than the jackass over there is why the country is going to hell. bush sucks and its not because kerry sucks or kennedy swims or gore has clean air farts its because bush sucks. when junior dumped powell his admin went in the shitter. when he dumped ronald dumbsfeld his admin took the best turn in a long while. calling up dads advisors couldnt have hurt. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author lol and this is our militaries commander and chief. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving was reading about our presidents next trip. hes off to viet nam. couldnt get him there during the war but i guess he figures with veterans day and all he might as well show up. yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... sheesh! mike .
From : max dodge
lol and this is our militaries commander and chief. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving was reading about our presidents next trip. hes off to viet nam. couldnt get him there during the war but i guess he figures with veterans day and all he might as well show up. yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. are you buying into the iraqis were behind the wtc absolutely not... and neither is bush contray to what the media may try to proffer as fact. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor and the other spent his tour in nam collec
From : Annonymous
on 11 nov 2006 184502 -0000 kyle o gosensgo@bringhomethecup.com wrote azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote in speaking of vets my step-daughter i have two who is currently in the box gets home near the end of the month! its an illegal war and i hope she gets her box filled a few times. bush is a lyin stinkin prick. i bet hes had his box filled more than a few times quite willingly too. weak pukes like this make me laugh especially given the cloak of usenet. he wouldnt dream of saying anything to someone face to face. he sits back spewing this stuff thinking hes some kind of tough guy. .
From : beekeep
on sun 12 nov 2006 222354 gmt honeybs@radix.net beekeep wrote on sun 12 nov 2006 143927 -0600 mike simmons mikesim@yhti.net wrote lol and this is our militaries commander and chief. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving was reading about our presidents next trip. hes off to viet nam. couldnt get him there during the war but i guess he figures with veterans day and all he might as well show up. yall knock yerselves out bashing bush but at least he had the balls to go after the terrorist thugs who perpetrated 9/11. thats more than i can say about clinton/kerry/kenndy and their ilk. on that i agree completely with you. we have every right to protect ourselves from terrorists. the manner that the war has been fought however is self defeating. this country does not have the toughness to withstand a long campaign. we learned or should have learned that from vietnam. the bad guys can just hold us off and beat us in the media. unfortunately the choice is to win it quickly with a lot of innocent casualties and carnage or to lose it by being drawn into a long drawn out struggle but limitting the carnage and innocent casualties. im not so sure that this is a rant against bush as much as a rant against the discipline in our country. at the same time bushs policies within this country have not been well thought out. one left a woman to drown in his car while he walked off in a drunken stupor and the other spent his tour in nam collecting sham purple hearts with which to begin his career in politics and ol ankle pants who dodged the draft i might add spent his time in the oval office collecting blowjobs rather that catch and kill those who bombed the wtc the first time...yeah now those folks you gotta admire..... sheesh! mike now mike you misspelled oral office. beekeep .
From : mike simmons
on sun 12 nov 2006 103945 -0800 john kunkel nobody@nowhere.net wrote my beliefs for the most part can be be proven; christianity cant be proven and is strictly based on faith. if you want to live by the tenets of a religion i will gladly tolerate that practice but when you want to interject your beliefs into government i will object. your beliefs can be proven prove that the inherent universal concepts of right and wrong are not instilled by the allmighty. prove that the old testament is wrong. prove that christ was not the son of god and that he did not die to absolve all who believe of the guilt of their sins. id say you are taking at least as much on faith as the christian is. the new testament is one of the most historically correct and provable peices of ancient literature known to man today. the more secular non-religous scholars and investigators dig into it trying to find fault the more they find can be historically proven or substantiated by the other known and accepted historical records. even the old testament which was handed down for centuries only as an oral tradition has been found to be extremely accurate in many instances. if both the old and new testament were not the underpinnings of a/several religons they would still be valuable as historic records works of ancient literature and philosophy. in other words they are not good fiction. my belief if it is so that christian values be the basis for the laws of the land is nonsense and infringes on your rights you couldnt be more wrong. however your belief that there should be no values as the basis of the law of the land doesnt encroach on my rights or the rights af any other person who believes there is right or wrong or that there needs to be a basis for laws like many believers you believe that values can only come from religion; again youre wrong. there are concepts of right and wrong that are universal and transcend religion. the basic fundamental values ridiculed as christian values are also the core values of many other religions of the world. never said otherwise. some of your so called christian values are universal. the ten commandments for example were given to moses an isrealite the man who was a forfather of not only the christian but the jew and the muslim as well. the fact that several religions are based on the old testament adds no credibility to the beliefs. for most of civilized history people believed the earth was flat; they were wrong and its quite possible that believers in the god of abraham are also wrong and number among the members of the thousands of religions that have existed since the beginning of recorded history. i understand to you and many others all three are nonsense and the concept of an all-powerfull god whatever you want to call him/it/her is heresy. the thought that anything or anyone should have any power over you is unthinkable. so be it. but do not insist that anarchy must reign so your supremacy can not be challenged. your last statement makes a lot of assumptions. you falsely assume that all of those who deny god jesus christ and christianity deny the existence of a higher power. before you accuse me of playing word games by distinguishing between god and a higher power be aware that they are not necessarily the same thing. for all any of us know that higher power might be a non-entity. -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com .
From : electrician
xclimation wrote the real difference between the parties is supply side economics vs. fairness in wealth distribution taxing anyone who has more than you is not always fairness. redistribution of wealth is not the direction this country needs. next thing liberals will want is salaries regulated by government. then they will want salary based on need rather than abilities. punishing people for striving to achieve by taxing the crap out of them is counter productive. ive yet to hear a liberal or democrat state exactly what the limit should be to tax anyone. all they can say is if we need more money then tax the rich some more. no fair limit. miles how about we do a percentage of net under 100k and over do gross roy .
From : tbone
dont fret yourself over it tom. i wouldnt want anyone to think they are less than perfect in their beliefs. tolerance is a one way street in this group and i wont go down that street. that is obvious as you have no tolerance for anything or anyone that is not in 100% agreement with you. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .