M'I`5,Persecutio n MI5 are A fraid to Adm it The yre Behind t he P ersecution

From : Annonymous

Q: mi5 are afraid to admit theyre behind. the persecution mi5 have issued a. formal denial of any involvement in my life to the security service tribunal as you. might expect them to; but more importantly the persecutors have never. denied that theyre from the security service despite several years of accusations. from my corner on usenet and in faxed. articles. i am not surprised that the security service tribunal found no determination in your favour. i am. however a little surprised that the persecutors. have refused to confirm my identification of them; by doing so they implicitly admit that my guess. was right. no determination in your. favour says the security service tribunal in 1997 i made a. complaint to the security service tribunal giving only the bare outlines of. my case. i do not think it would have made very much difference if id made a much more detailed. complaint since the tribunal has no ability to perform investigatory functions. it can only ask mi5. if they have an interest in a subject to which mi5. are of course free to be economical with the truth. a couple. of months after my complaint the tribunal. replied that; the security service tribunal have. now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has. been made on. your complaint. needless to. say this reply didnt surprise me in the slightest. it is a well established fact that the secret service are a den of. liars and the tribunal a toothless watchdog so. to see them conforming to these stereotypes might be. disappointing but unsurprising. it is noteworthy. that the tribunal never gives the plaintiff information on whether the no. determination in your favour is because mi5 claims to have no interest in. him or whether they claim their interest is justified. in the 1997 report of. the security service commissioner he writes that the ambiguity of the terms in which the notification. of the tribunals decision is expressed. is intentional since a less ambiguous answer would indicate to the plaintiff whether he were indeed under. mi5 surveillance. but i note that the ambiguity also allows mi5. to get away with lying to the question of their interest in. me; they can claim to the tribunal that they have no interest but at a future. date when it becomes clear. that they did indeed place me under surveillance and harassment they can claim their interest. was justified - and the tribunal will presumably not admit that in their previous. reply mi5 claimed to have no interest. he doesnt know who. we are in early january 1996 i flew on a british airways. jet from london to montreal; also. present on the plane about three or four rows behind me were two young men one of them fat and. voluble the other silent. it was quite clear that these two had. been planted on the aircraft to wind me up. the fat youth described the town in poland. where i had spent christmas. and made some unpleasant personal slurs against me. most interestingly he said the words he doesnt. know who we are. now i. find this particular form of words very interesting because while it. is not a clear admission it is only a half-hearted attempt at denial of my. guess that they = mi5. had my guess been wrong the fat youth would surely have said so more clearly. what he. was trying to do was to half-deny something he knew. to be true and he was limited to making statements which he knew to be not false; so he made a. lukewarm denial which on the face of it means nothing but in fact acts as a. confirmation of my guess of who. they are. on one. of the other occasions when i saw the persecutors in person on the ba flight to toronto in june 1993 one of the group of four men said. if he tries to run away well find him. but. the other three stayed totally quiet and avoided eye contact. they did so to avoid being. apprehended and identified - since if. they were identified their employers would have been revealed and it would. become known that it was the secret services who were. behind the persecution. why are mi5. so afraid to admit their involvement if you think about it what has been going on in britain for. the last nine years is simply. beyond belief. the british declare themselves to be decent by. definition so when they engage in indecent activities such as the persecution of. a mentally ill person their decency because were british. is still in the forefront of their minds and a process of mental doublethink kicks in where their antisocial and. indecent activities are blamed on the victim because its his. fault were persecuting him and their self-regard and. self-image of decency remains untarnished. as remarked in another article some time ago this process is. basically the same as a large number. of germans employed fifty years ago against slavic untermenschen and the jewish threat - the germans. declared germans are known to be de