M.I,5`Pe rsecution ` M I5 Waste Ta xpayer Million s on Pointless Ha te-Campaign

From : Annonymous

Q: four years of mi5. persecution posts on internet groups for approximately the first three years. of the mi5 persecution from june 1990 until late 1992 i kept as quiet as possible in the. hope that by not reacting mi5s interest in me would decrease and they would simply. go away of their own accord. this is the sort of behaviour some people. employ against. bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction then they might simply go away and. victimize someone else. unfortunately this tactic didnt work. the quieter i became. the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the security service operatives.. for about two years i didnt watch tv at all. yet. this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they. continued to follow me wherever i went they continued to. induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers and they continued to encourage me to commit suicide.. they seemed to regard my refusal. to react as a crime which they would have to put right by ever more extreme. forms of abuse. finally in 1995. i changed tactics radically. since late 1994 i had had accounts with internet providers in ontario. canada. i discovered the cornucopia. of internet groups on every topic from consumer electronics to politics and legal. topics and i discovered online services such as compuserve and aol. in. may 1995 i made the first posting to the. conspiracy group on the subject of bbcs hidden shame. bbcs. hidden shame the internet group. discussion which has now reached its fourth anniversary started with an article in alt.conspiracy which. i reproduce here. date thu may 4 182724. 1995 groups. alt.conspiracy subject. bbcs hidden shame remember the two-way televisions in george orwells 1984 the ones which. watched you back which you could. never get rid of only the sound could be turned down well the country. which brought orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. since 1990 the british have been waging war against. one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of. abuse in the transmitted media in their. efforts to humiliate their victim. and the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do is. not even illegal - the uk has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens nor does it proscribe. harassment or abuse except in the case of. racial abuse. a lot of people in england know this to. be going on yet so far they have maintained perfect omerta; not a sound not a squeak has escaped into the english press and. for all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into. the public domain. have the british gone mad. i think we should be told at this point i did not name mi5. as my persecutors. i was still unsure that. they were the ones responsible for the psychological terrorism. in followup posts however i did name them; and the persecutors. have never denied the claim; so i think my. guess is valid. the security service tribunal in 1997 have said no determination in. your favour was made but it is a well established fact that mi5 lies. routinely to the tribunal which has never found in favour of a plaintiff so no conclusions can. be drawn. from this. this first post was made to alt.conspiracy but. further posts were made to the uk-local. groups in particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and uk.politics which. is now called uk.politics.misc. some time ago i tried to take. the battle to the compuserve forums ukpolitics which is now called ukcurrent - current affairs but my articles were censored by. the forum operators. such censorship is impossible on the internet. groups. police refuse to. act i have complained several times to. the metropolitan police who have each time. refused to help. from. green green@guidion.demon.co.uk groups. uk.miscuk.politicsalt.politics.britishsoc.culture.british subject. re mi5 persecution why arent the british police doing their job reply-to. green@guidion.demon.co.uk date sun apr 7. 211330 1996 bu765@torfree.net mike corley writes last easter 1995 i went into the local police station in london and spoke. to an officer about. the harassment against me. but i couldnt provide tangible evidence; what people said in many. cases years ago is beyond proof and without something to support my statements i. cannot expect a police officer to take the. complaint seriously. this in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for. you. the old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits. forced on them by that pillock michael howard and without evidence they. often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to. court. i doubt that. the police are actually being leant on but they probably realise that if they looked into this they would be leant on hard.. the met always stays away from anything that looks like it has defence security or secret