MI5 Persecution: No Justice 20/11/96 (8894)

From : Annonymous

Q: subject scandalous frivolous or vexatious groups uk.miscuk.legal organization toronto free-net summary keywords a couple of weeks ago i issued a summons against the bbc in my local county court for the tort of private nuisance caused by the spying by their readers on my home. my argument was that their spying had prevented me watching the at home and therefore interfered with my normal use of my home. the bbcs litigation dept at white city have replied not with a defence but with an application for my claim to be struck out because; a it discloses no reasonable cause of action; and/or b it is scandalous frivolous or vexatious. their application will be heard next week. they have not made any affidavit in support of their application nor have they given particulars as to why they consider my summons to be unarguable in law which would be a necessary condition for there to be no reasonable cause of action. i am more worried about point b. allegations are scandalous says stuart simes book if they impute dishonesty against another party; which my allegations do against the bbcs readers. as for frivolous or vexatious i think that will be up to me to make a good argument for the effect the bbcs spying has had on my life and up to the district judges opinion of my case. apparently seeking to have a claim struck out in this way is common practice when the plaintiff is a litigant-in-person. even if it is struck out there is always the opportunity to appeal. i think we could be in for a fight next week. ........................................................................... sun 02 mar 1997 203859 uk.legal thread 52 of 54 lines 13 re scandalous frivolous or vexatious respno 1 of 1 kate@carterce.demon.co.uk kkkkatie andy@solicit.demon.co.uk andrew nichols writes well thatll liven up the dear old district judge. almost worth taking the day off to see how mike fares. almost worth taking a day off to see if he exists kate -- just back from the us - youve got to love a country that puts vertical clearance impeded for low bridge ........................................................................... subject re scandalous frivolous or vexatious groups uk.miscuk.legal references e6fefj.ie7.0.bloor@torfree.net nqovqianhggzewl3@solicit.demon.co.uk8$ organization toronto free-net distribution burridge@osiris.win-uk.net paul burridge wrote almost worthwhile taking the day off to go and punch him in the face for all abuse hes given us on these groups. which court is it thank you for your kind thought. im not telling you which court it is. i dont want to be hounded by irate uk-miscreants! as for raising eyebrows the member of staff who took the summons form didnt change their facial expression at all. seen it all before no doubt. ........................................................................... derek tidman derek@adams.demon.co.uk wrote bu765@torfree.net mike corley writes -im not telling you which court it is. i dont want to be hounded by irate -uk-miscreants! - -as for raising eyebrows the member of staff who took the summons form didnt -change their facial expression at all. seen it all before no doubt. take no notice mike some people are like that. i hope you finally get this matter into court. im not so fond of the threats of violence against the persistent yet quiet for a bit and probably soon to restart.. spammer that is mike corley. yet encouraging the fantasies of the mentally ill isnt exactly healthy either. do you go up to homeless mad people as say things like theyre coming to get you or look out behind you. smid ........................................................................... quite the contary mike. your recent posts have been no problem. by explaining things rationally and not spamming us you have made more friends than you know. i hope that you sort out your problem sincerely. -- *********************************************************************** im alan packer and i move in a very mysterious way. if replying to me ........................................................................... derek tidman derek@adams.demon.co.uk wrote j.j.smith@ftel.co.uk john j smith writes i think its good for mike to vent his anger and frustration on these two groups. consider it to be part of your duty to the comunity in general. yep. just not the i think 180 posts one week when his illness got really bad. oh yeah and there was only three real posts just repeated 60 times. mike does a first class job of drawing out the real personality of the person hiding behind a node name. the way people react to mike gives it all away. erm explain this rather dubious statement. as for you. dont you think its a trifle condescending to refer to pe