MI5 Persecution: Intelligence agency sources on the Web (1114)

From : Annonymous

Q: date thu may 4 182724 1995 groups alt.conspiracy subject bbcs hidden shame remember the two-way televisions in george orwells 1984 the ones which watched you back which you could never get rid of only the sound could be turned down well the country which brought orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. since 1990 the british have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate their victim. and the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do is not even illegal - the uk has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in the case of racial abuse. a lot of people in england know this to be going on yet so far they have maintained perfect omerta; not a sound not a squeak has escaped into the english press and for all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. have the british gone mad i think we should be told. ------------------------------- from mr.b dgb01@stir.ac.uk groups alt.conspiracy subject re bbcs hidden shame date mon may 8 053213 1995 mmmm. who exactly is this victim youre talking about first up britain or the uk not england - england is a part of britain like kansas is a part of the usa does have laws that protect the individual from harassement - you cant just threaten people willy nilly. there are laws against that. and if someone lies about you in the press or tv then you have recourse to libel/slander etc. laws. true britain has no privacy laws as such but isnt that a good thing as of this moment the govt. are considering a privacy law but it is unlikely to succeed. why because any such law would benefit the priviledged and those in power. privacy laws while supposedly protecting the individual help those in power hide their mistakes/scandals. they stop the press etc. investigating. privacy laws are undemocratic - they prevent the people from keeping an eye on govt. and stop looking for some kinda conspiracy in the british press. its hardly perfect but your notion that they dont cover/campaign against press legislation harrassment discrimination human rights etc. is plain wrong. youve never seen a british paper in yr life. you clearly have a specific case/individual in mind. speak up! the thought police arent coming round just yet. douglas. ------------------------------- date mon may 8 192128 1995 groups alt.conspiracysubject re bbcs hidden shame confession time - the victim is/was me except my name isnt corley but thats irrelevant. what happened was not threats; just invasion of privacy in a partiicularly flagrant and shocking way in a way which most people would consider to constitute harassment. you know theres a particular category of person with mental illness to whom tv and radio talk ie they feel the broadcast is directed at them in particular this happpened to me quite some time ago in the uk im originally from london so ive seen plenty of british media print and other. they invaded my home with their bugs they repeated what i was saying in the privacy of my home and they laughed that it was so funny that i was impotent and could not even communicate what was going on. who did this our friends on bbc television our friends in itn last but not least our friends in capital radio in london and on radio 1. how did they do this ill give you an example. about a year ago i was listening to chris tarrant capital radio dj among other pursuits on his radio morning show when he said talking about someone he didnt identify you know this bloke he says were trying to kill him. we should be done for attempted manslaughter which mirrored something i had said a day or two before im not paranoid honest!. now that got broadcast to the whole of london - if any recordings are kept of the shows then itll be there. 209 -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com .