MI5 Persecution: Fitted up 26/4/96 (333)

From : Annonymous

Q: subject re mi5 please can someone explain whats going on here groups uk.misc references 4l1khm$4cn@utopia.hacktic.nl 4l2lhj$6h6@big.shef.ac.uk organization toronto free-net distribution david stretch dds@leicester.ac.uk wrote iain l m hotchkies iain@hotch.demon.co.uk wrote the remote possibility remains that mike corley is either not schizophrenic but is pretending to be so or he is a product of a number of persons psychology students. given other ways in which i have seen people exploit some of the internets capabilities to disrupt or indulge in sophistry or to exploit a medium that resembles speech without the non-verbal and intonation cues etc as a means of denigrating others i question your use albeit in quotes of the word remote. im not saying it isnt remote and therefore it is great im just saying that i dont think we can easily classify it as remote moderate or great. i think you can build up quite a good picture based on what someone says and on their posting patterns. i dont think the internet capitals no less is as opaque a medium as you make it out to be. it is not easy to determine the validity of all information on the internet without making use of extra supplementary information. we do have the problem pointed out by someone else of the possibly too perfect textbook characteristics of what is being posted. i explained that one but i dont mind explaining it again you dont mind having it explained again to you do you now. the reason my symptoms are such a perfect fit to the textbook is because the people causing the campaign fitted me up in such a way that what they did would resemble the symptoms of schizophrenia. hence tv radio other media people in the streets etc. by a fortunate coincidence for them these mthods of harassment are the ones which offer easiest channels of access for them. its really quite neat. all it takes is for people to start believing that the symptoms arent symptoms but reality though and the house of cards collapses in a heap. and there are lots of people now who knoiw full well what has gone on. if harrassment by email etc has happened by someone out of the country can a complaint be made that results in arrest or whatever upon that persons entry into the country an interesting point which mike may be able to inform us about as hes said he will be in the uk in a few weeks time. picture the scene at the airport; i arrest you for being mike corley and mailbombing people but my name isnt corley. who he mailbombing isnt illegal is it youd have to lock up a lot of people if sending annoying email was a crime er..... -- david stretch greenwood institute of child health univ. of leicester uk. dds@leicester.ac.uk phone+44 0116-254-6100 fax+44 0116-254-4127 ======================================================================== context-free parts of articles conversations and things-on-the-tv and assume they are meant for you. mike this is called paranoia. but thats the way real abuse works too. people interject words and phrases into what they say which they know will have meaning for the listener. and sometimes they make it obvious. the very first evening of my job in oxford we went for a drink with the technical director and a couple of other employees. the td said in an as-if aside to one of the others is this the bloke whos been on tv he said it directly in front of me and obviously meant mke to hear him saying it. the other person replied yes i think so. i think the subtext of what the td said was why are they bothering with him hes so insignificant why would they possibly want to spend the resources going after him and putting all that expensive technology in his home when there must be much better targets. the technical director was given to sometimes disrespecting people you see and in my case he couldnt see the point of anyone expending money on harassing me. ==================================================================== subject re treatment of schizophrenia groups uk.miscuk.legaluk.politicsalt.politics.british followup-to uk.miscuk.legaluk.politicsalt.politics.british references 153321z22041996@anon.penet.fi 4lge6r$p00@.ox.ac.uk organization toronto free-net distribution illtud daniel idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk wrote probably cos you come across as reasoned & articulate its a pity about the other stuff veracity is so unreasonable. pps. you should still see a doc again mike. doing so. trouble is all this mental-illness stuff provides camouflage for the harassment which is real. it alows people who otherwise would consider the harassment seriously to disregard it. it makes conversations with a lawyer or police brief when otherwise it would merit discussion. the point is that there are two possibilities happening here- 1. theres a large conspiracy of people out to get you for no other reason than that they have the