M,I-5 Pers ecution ' No Justi ce for t he V ictims of MI5

From : Annonymous

Q: mi5 persecution update friday 11 june. 1999 harassment in a pub in clapham. tuesday lunchtime once a. month or once every other month i meet a polish friends of mine who lives in clapham north and sometimes we go to a. particular pub near where he lives. the last time was some two months ago;. i did not have my minidisc-walkman. with me and consequently was seriously harassed by people mi5 had instructed to harass me in. the pub. this tuesday 8 june 1999 we again went to the same pub for. a pre-meal drink. this time i. did have my minidisc-walkman with me. as you can guess we were followed into the pub by a. couple of young people im getting older and. older - isnt it funny how the mi5 agents all look young these days. they started talking about my situation. in particular some travel i had booked the. previous day. unfortunately they were talking fairly quietly. and my minidisc didnt pick up their speech. mi5s schizophrenic reasoning is that. simultaneously i am very important and worthy of their acts of persecution and i am also. totally unimportant and their abuse of me doesnt matter. perhaps they should test. their agents and managers for obsessive personalities or psychotic features. in the same way as employees are drug-tested. mi5 might. lose their worst cases employees. if some psychological testing were applied to their recruitment. procedure. toothless. watchdogs. what a surprise. recently i have been engaging in. communications with two watchdogs the security service tribunal. which deals with complaints against the security service and always clears mi5 of any wrongdoing and the data. protection registrar which is mandated to investigate misuse. of personal data held on. computer. in a letter to nick brooks security service. tribunal secretary dated 20 april i asked him if the tribunal as an allegedly independent body. had the means to investigate complaints against. mi5 other than asking mi5 to themselves investigate. complaints. to my disappointment his reply two weeks later answered the question only indirectly. in the negative. whatever the reader might think of. the merits of the case i have been putting before you in faxed articles this last. year and half you will surely recognise that it is a significant anomaly for. the tribunal to have no independent. means of investigating complaints particularly given the view expressed even. by previous home secretaries that the security services. are untrustworthy. mi5 persecution. no justice for the victims of mi5 in a previous article i detailed. the similarities between the current mi5 persecution in england and other historical instances of. similar persecution notably that by the nazi germans in the. thirties and forties. the germans persecuted first the mentally ill the epileptics. and those suffering from. schizophrenia then moved on to racial groups; in todays britain the persecution is again directed at. those with mental illness which the british in. their cowardice find easier than taking on racial groups. as the germans did. but just as in thirties germany there was no recourse against a malign and omnipotent state so the. mi5 secret police in the modern british fascist state allow no. justice for their victims. no. recourse against the security services illegal harassment it has become apparent to me over the last nine years just how loaded. the dice are in todays britain. a fundamentally fascist country which masquerades as a democracy.. britain is a democracy in name only; the establishment the. defence and mi5 secret police are always there regardless of. which party has been voted into power most recently - and from new labours conduct in office one. finds it difficult to tell them apart from old tories. in their crackdowns on the sick and vulnerable in society. in thirties germany the victims of the nazi regime. had no legal recourse against their state oppressors; and in. todays fascist british state the victims of the establishment and its mi5 secret. police similarly have no recourse against the illegal. state-funded and organised oppression. there is supposed to be a mechanism for dealing with mi5 crimes. in the shape of the security service tribunal and commissioner; yet these have never. found favour of a plaintiff. one might. as well ask the nazi ss to investigate crimes against epileptics. or jews as ask the security service tribunal to investigate mi5 crimes against british citizens; it is quite. obvious what the answer is going to be regardless of what you say to them and. what evidence you provide. the tribunal and commissioner are a. mere formality a whitewashing body to. give the secret services a veneer beneath which they. hide their shabby criminality. institutional racism and. bigotry in the metropolitan police the recent inquiry into the racist murder of stephen lawrence. found clear evidence of. systematic and