Kerry Quandry
From : redneck tookover hell
Q: hes about to wrap up a four year vacation--maybe he can help then. its too bad kerry isnt wrapping up his 20 year vacation in the senate politics the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich. .
Replies:
From : budd cochran
craig christian wrote nope. it was clintons agressive plan regarding the bond market. bond market rofl. interest rates plummeted in the 90s. you do know that interest rates are tied to long term bonds dont you i still invest in high-tech stocks ... the same ones i invested in int he 90s. great whats your point that doesnt change the fact that in the 90s the market was fueled heavily by trillions invested in high risk stocks that failed. many companies were heavily invested in and never produced a product. people saw gold and were suckered in. you or your broker werent one of those...great but doesnt change what happened. to not realize just where the money came from is economic ignorance. part of the reason is that high-tech jobs are flying out of the country at an unprecendented rate. the economy is growing rapidly. unemployment is lower now than the average of clintons so called great years. consumer spending is up as well. im doing much better now so is my company family and friends. the 90s sucked and clinton/gore ignored the economists who predicted the market collapse. when the economy was falling in 2000 gore still campaigned saying how great things were looking...opposite of economists predictions. so let me get this straight ... youre saying that there were more unemployed people in the mid-90s than now what right-wing economic rag are you reading read the labor reports. they are publicly available. unemployment is now lower than the average of the clinton years. go on go read it if you want to learn the truth of your propaganda based thinking. nope ... this country was in a recession when he took office. in bush sr.s last year in office the economy grew at 2%. not falling as you claim. when clinton left office it was falling. these figures are public record. now go look them up! geez it is just unbelievable how the lefts mind works. they believe whats told to them and never ever actually look it up to see if its true. i remember that being part of the presidential debates. i was a perot fan at that time ... mainly because i worked for him ... and that was perots beef as well with daddy bush. rofl!! now that explains alot! perot had a few good idea but the guy was just plain skitzo and unstable. but now i know where your mindset is from. actually i dont like kerry. i simply hate bush more. kerry has very few supporters. most such as yourself know very little about kerry edwards or even bush. just know the headlines. that isnt at all what i am advocating. we cannot afford to alienate the world. period. were not. we have more support than you lefties realize. but you harp on a couple countries such as russia and france. i could care less about how chirac feels about the usa. his country undermined the oil for food program. chirac sold out and was working to get the sanctions lifted against iraq so they could supply the very items the sanctions put a stop too. the report also makes it clear that saddam had every intention of restarting his weapons programs once he conned the un to lift the sanctions. and you want us to buddy up to these people good grief. strong alliances will insure our future success as a world leader ... not just militarily but economically as well. this is partly true. but the main issue seems to be with russia and france who both worked to undermine the sanctions so they could increase trade with iraq. if kerry had his way saddam would still be in iraq and still be in kuwait. saddam would control a huge % of the worlds oil and raise havoc in the middle east even more so that he already has. kerry voted against kicking saddam out of kuwait. ya great guy to have in the wh. .
From : john kunkel
heinz kerry = white trash with money inherited money at that. and bush started out as a ditchdigger his daddy covered his ass from day one and a good thing for him daddy was there or he would be digging ditches. imagine laura bush telling a reporter to shove it imagine a cabinet member telling someone to fuck off!! .
From : john kunkel
i am not a kerry supporter i am anti-bush. put another way you are one confused little puppy. perhaps you could do a write-in vote for perot john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .
From : john z kerry
i think you need to make a list of good things gwb if any hes done and mistakes hes made. sit back and look really hard! please dont list the big tax refund we got. because that just shows how little money it takes to buy votes. vote for donald trump. what do we have to loose an easy question to answer three things 1. hatred of bush 2. hatred of bush 3. hatred of bush no core values just hatred of bush. john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .
From : budd cochran
tbone wrote nice try pinhead. you compared your truck to a lightning for a reaction to a boost increase and like you said you cant spin out of something that is still in print electronically. bullshit............ prove it. you wont because it doesnt exist. put up or shut up. you were the one who claimed that the lightning would react poorly to a boost increase no i didnt idiot. i said it would benefit if nothing but a pulley was installed and no other adjustments made. anyone with common sense knows that........ kind of leaves you out doesnt it. again ...... prove your statement or shut up. and when asked how used your truck and its reaction as an example. that seems like a comparison to me and a bad one at that. another flat out lie on your part. all i said was i know what my truck does. to lie is one thing but to lie and know everyone knows you are lying is beyond stupid. once again .... prove it or shut up. put the two of them together and you have a budd. a level you still havent achieved. only in that bitter tiny little mind of yours jerry. i must say i can see why budd likes you so much you two are so much alike. oh wow ...... now the troll boy is crying because he has no backing or support. name one person on here that supports or backs you..... there is none troll boy. listening to you cry is really becoming boring. little tommy troll is really reaching now. even his usual spins are getting weaker and weaker. crawl back under you rock little man or go on down to the other thread where you have bob fooled that you know what you are doing. if bob ever does some back reading he will fast discover what a lying piece of crap you really are. back under your rock troll boy............. jerry .
From : steve carolinabreezehvac
steve@carolinabreezehvac steve@removethis.carolinabreezehvac.com wrote kept the peace and gave us 8 years of kick ass economic reform. even paid down the deficit. not even... in the last 2 years we have prospered while no small business did under clinton. this is simply bovine excrement. more people prospered between the years 1992-2000 than at any time in recent history and certainly any time that a we had a republican president ... ever. clintons economic plan created jobs. unemployment was at record lows under him more so than any other president in recent history. yea.whatever man. i could not pay what i pay to my techs now under clinton but boy a week after bush was in the public who actually sets the economy..not the president things took off.. and btw...you might want to reconsider that statement about record lows since it was clinton that basically sent most of the average joes jobs overseas. if you look back a history this country has always done better from a financial standpoint under democratic leadership. 90% of the recession recovery and 100% of depression recovery have been under an elected democrat. clinton didnt do it. he was in office when regans and bushs plans kicked in and he simply got to sit back and go.look what we have done. now im not saying that democrats are all good ... in fact i dont affiliate myself with either party. honestly ... do you really think that dole would have done a better job in 96 im positive he wouldnt have. nope. but he didnt stand a snowballs chance either. oh how i long for a president that can put three words together. that should be a country music song ... then elect in teresa funny if the election were between her and bush ... id vote for her. bush is a moron ... over 50% of americans think so not to mention what the rest of the world thinks. you would vote for a person that is just like her hubby...when shes at a gay rally shes all for gay rights yet her husband isnt...wow. shes all for creating jobs in america altho iirc the numbers for her own company are like 75% overseas positions.. and yes what the rest of the world thinks does matter. we cannot continue to be a world leader with the majority of the world as our enemy. how you figure that you think the rest of the world is out enemy far from it. altho uneducated statements like that that get back to the average person in another country could indeed give the impression that the average us citizen is out to get everyone.. craig c. .
From : john z kerry
heh-heh... you know this is gonna spawn a looong thread right http//www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/misc11.jpg ;- .
From : john z kerry
id be glad to look at the specs you like so much only the deutzusa site doesnt seem to have the engine you are talking so much about. uhhh...you are spitting silliness. not at all provide a link. the bf4m2013c & bf6m2013c are both automotive engines. what more do you want a link when did i say everything would be the same. you claimed more efficiency with the duetz if it were replacing the cummins. you said nothing of redesigning the entire drivetrain. thus a simple r&r would not render what yuo are claiming. do you think im naive yes. when youve finished your several years of r&d i may actually find merit to your claims. ill get right on it...hold your breath. you made a bunch of claims i say the package was designed for the cummins and not the deutz and years of r&d proves it. i then ask you to prove your claim and back it with some r&d and you are pissed too bad. so you are argueing vibration robs efficiency...ok...ill let you have that one. now you feel like a winner i didnt win anything but you certainly overlooked something. why you claim to be an engineer but totally missed denied the vibration factor that automotive and diesel engineers have been fighting for years. the bf4m2013c was designed as an automotive engine. so.... so i still dont see it on the deutz site. got a link you speak of big rigs no im not the ceo of any manufacture nor do i play one on tv. so my discussion is of personal vehicles. terrific. you missed the point. in a sector of use where efficiency with power is paramount one configuration dominates the market. further in the automotive market its long been a fact that the inline six gasoline engines such as the ford 300ci the chevy 250 and the mopar 225 delivered better power with better mpg than other engines in their respective lineups. interesting also the return of the inline six in the latest generation of gm suvs touting the power of a v8 with the fuel efficiency of a six cylinder. iirc its sitting at about 270hp nothing to sneeze at. the other continents are flooded with small pickups with diesel four bangers. keyword being small. the d50 came with a diesel option and there were a few small diesels in the d100. neither model sold well here in the u.s. really if so id like to see a model number on them. ...still holding your breath...can you still see the monitor or are you blacking out yup just what i figured. when called upon for facts you throw distraction and run for cover. you cliam there are four cylinder cat diesels in those buses feel free to give a model number. otherwise ill agree with the cat website which has no roadgoing four cylinders capable of moving a bus at any speed that would keep it on schedule. now i took it for granted you were speaking of a dodge truck. if you are getting 30mpg i would really like to know your secret. first you say 25mpg now you boost the figure to 30mpg. ill readily claim 25mpg is possible as ive done it. wrong. what bearing does my voter registration have on this discussion just so close to the election...im getting emotional. obviously. max life liberty and the pursuit of any jackass that threatens it. embellished usnavy slogan .
From : john kunkel
tbone wrote and it is ignorant to think that greed is never involved either. there is greed in all walks of life. its ignorance that leads you to believe that most of it exists in businesses. no that is just where it is most obvious and in most cases the driving force behind it. just look at prime examples like m$. and wh can do that quickly if we want to. true but the left wont allow us to use our own oil. lol always to the right huh miles. how about conservation no we need them now. but we do not have them now. but we can conserve now. we just wont do it. and as long as we keep drilling that will never happen that is until we run out when it will be too late. so who pays for your alternatives we are going to pay eventually anyway. it is just a matter of time and the cost goes up every day that we wait. there is no free lunch miles. and as long as we keep oil cheap it will remain that way. not so. in england and elsewhere gas is $6+ a gallon. hybrids and electrics are not popular choices there just as they arent here. because they are too expensive for the income level of many but they are there. perhaps you should spend a little time over there and see how they live compared to the way that we do. there homes are smaller as are their cars and yetthey seem to be able to manage quite well using about half of the energy that we do. more complete bs. americans are simply spoiled and dont want to give up anything unless they are forced to. if you want new technologies you have to make the old way more expensive or more restrictive and that will not happen if we keep exploiting the worlds resources the way that we are until it is too late. bs. you have to make the alternatives work for people the way they need it. hybrids and electrics do not provide the funtionality people need. bs. they dont always provide the luxury and size that people want. there is a big difference between need and want. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .
From : john kunkel
yeah its got a hemi in it. fine and dandy. problem is its uggggglee! looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current dodge durango. taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went on the chevrolet equinox until someone at chevrolet said clear taillights! no! dude! we totally have to do clear taillights! ptewph. .
From : john z kerry
yes i undestand there isnt that engine in the van i have worked on them for 25 yrs for chrysler.i read alot of posts.people get confused of what they put in here. i just read someone asking a question about an intrepid with a 3.0 litre no such thing either that ram 250 may have omitted the other 0 making it a ram 2500. thats why i say post it all to get the best answer available from the people who take the time to read them.this is my last post on this subject have a nice day maxpower wrote i would say yours is....the v10 and the deisel engine does not have the oil consumption technical service bulletin as the other engines chrysler uses there fore it makes a difference.. it would... if there had been any ram 250 vans built with the v10 or diesel... wanna try to dig that hole a little deeper or are you just gonna step out of it now you must be one of the guys that come into a parts department and ask for an certain part without stating what engine you have then complain because you got the wrong part !!!! iow it doesnt make any difference which engine he has. now which is the dumbest post yours is still the dumbest maxpower wrote i must say this is one of the dumbest posts i have ever read does anyone no what engine the vehicle has i mean it does make a big difference!!! its a 96 ram 250. it can have one of 3 different engines 3.9 5.2 5.9 and the vast majority of ram 250s had one of those engines 5.9 and ill wager that somewhere between none and .1% had the 3.9. all 3 engines are the same family same overall design. 2 of them even use exactly the same pistons and rings 3.9 and 5.2 all 3 use the same design cylinder heads and intake manifolds. iow it doesnt make any difference which engine he has. now which is the dumbest post .
From : john kunkel
he forgot the verse thou shall not kill! he didnt forget; he has no core values and never did. unlike the core values of a conservative that has him opposed to social change unless it benefits himself is someone who wants the government to butt out of corporations rights to steal and abuse people - but who wants the government to butt in to peoples private sex lives believes strongly in nationalism militarism war pre-emptive war flag waving radio propaganda intolerance racism homophobia intimidation land and order a large prison system my country right or wrong and murdering ethnic minorities while supporting totalitarianism. pretty much the same things that nazis supported. the kkk is conservative. that should provide enough of an idea of what conservative core values means. kerry quoting the bible is probably the height of liberal hypocrisy! so only conservatives can be hypocrites .
From : steve carolinabreezehvac
speaking of... http//www.washtimes.com/national/20030730-115323-1160r.htm careful with the word we cheney acted and looked like the weasel he is. a weasel you say what color john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .
From : john z kerry
and bush started out as a ditchdigger his daddy covered his ass from day one and a good thing for him daddy was there or he would be digging ditches. imagine a cabinet member telling someone to fuck off!! dam straight! and harvard business school graduates the best dang ditch diggers around! are you a cabinet member oh you are ok then fuck off! john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .
From : budd cochran
are ya sure that it came from the gas station. did you piss anybody off. if i were you i would move quickly on this before they change their pump filters of your gonna have a hell of a time proving it was them. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving steve@carolinabreezehvac steve@removethis.carolinabreezehvac.com wrote got a check engine light last night. pulled code with a drb and had a p0302....misfire on cylinder #2. checked cap rotor wire and plug....everythings fine... hummm...at 17000 miles kinda odd...but not out of the realm of possibilities.. so...fire it backup and sure enough..comes back with a 302and a 303.... check a few more items and finally find the problem...fuel pressures dropped considerably...got to love bad gas....lol...dropped the tank and i think the local bp station and i are gonna have a nice long talk about sand.... -- new sig file stolen from alt.autos.corvettes shut up dave. .
From : john z kerry
heinz kerry = white trash with money inherited money at that. imagine laura bush telling a reporter to shove it the shock value would be far greater than coming from fugly heinz. btw anyone else notice the way kerry handlers muzzled heinz several weeks ago john z kerry president t-bone steakhouses .
From : budd cochran
first my apologies for not answering sooner. i didnt realize until just now that you had responded. seems i have bitten off more than i can chew on responding to everyone. alaska is a huge state. its geology varies widely from one part to another. every part of our entire country is beautiful in one way or another so that argument is meaningless. its not meaningless. i dont want any part of the us drilled. as budd has so dubbed me nimby. not in my back yard and not in yours either. most of the area in question in alaska is barren treeless. well not exactly. the area the bush originally wanted to drill was the artic wildlife refuge. its beautiful ... ive been there. have you parts of it are treeless because of the cold tempertures and elevation. but those areas still house polar bears caribou and other wildlife. not only do i disagree with drilling the reasons that bush gave are rediculous. he wants to drill alaska because it will reduce our dependency on foreign oil. so what happens after six months of pumping when its all gone were back to depending on foreign oil and we have destroyed a wildlife refuge. scarred the land and had an adverse effect on the wildlife. i dont think its worth the damage it will cause for the limited amount of oil we will get. do you why not take the $$ that he was going to put into setting up shop and put it into r&d for alternatives is that asking too much you consider me ... lets see what did you call me ... a lefty because of that they say. but the argument is weak. the democrats wont allow drilling anywhere in the usa. ; rock on. you know there are *some* republicans that believe we shouldnt drill the us either. craig c. .
From : john z kerry
ive replaced all of the brake tubing except for the section that traverses to the rear of the truck. as it happens this particular section let go yesterday. does anyone know if the tubing can easily be replaced without removing the gas tank the tubing appears to be hidden between the frame of the truck and the tank. wasnt sure if there might be some plastic clips holding the brake tubing to the frame next to the gas tank. thanks in advance for any and all assistance. don .
From : john kunkel
that wont happen until after the election so that bush can buy their votes. oh wait a minute he said that they are a good thing for the country so i guess that they will be staying after all. does anybody understand what bonehead.....errrr t-bone is trying to say john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .
From : john z kerry
no. that much torque would require the 3/4 ton axle negating the 1/2 ton idea. and there is a great marketing idea that will never happen. i would buy a standard cab short bed 1500 truck with dana 60s front and rear in a heartbeat. for what i use a truck for that would be perfect. maybe one of these days when im really bored ill find a donor 2500 and start making things fit. denny .
From : clyde
i believe it was bush who sued gore in 2000. talk about your frivalous lawsuits. he cant run on his record for the last 4 years so lets attack the opponent. .
From : budd cochran
steve wrote nosey wrote ...and a non-tired engine will use no more oil at 3500 than at 1800. im not disputing that because i believe in almost every application you are correct but i did find this article interesting. it explains how low load operation at 4000 rpm causes oil consumption problems in the 97-01 ls1 and ls6 corvettes. http//www.idavette.net/hib/02ls6/page5.htm but thank god were not talking about a pos sbc here -p the fix is to not drive an ls1 like a sissy. pound the crap out of it always. then its fine. ; ray .
From : john kunkel
on mon 11 oct 2004 072715 gmt nosey kfrei43@removethis.hotmail.com wrote ...and a non-tired engine will use no more oil at 3500 than at 1800. speaking from experience you are wrong. i had a 350 that in normal around town and commuting use would go 1000 miles on a quart. but if i ran it on a high speed trip even for only 200 miles and assuming it was probably already half a quart low to start it would use nearly another quart in that 200 miles. it was like that since i bought it at 24000 miles and it stayed exactly like that up till the time i sold it at 124000 miles. read the comment again. he said a non-tired engine. it wasnt tired. using over a quart of oil every 200 highway miles is not an acceptable consumption rate even by 1967 standards. your 350 engine had significant problems at 24000 miles. this thing must have smoked like a freight train on the highway. it neither smoked nor leaked. it just used quite a bit of oil about a quart every 400 if you read my comments again youll see thats what it adds up to when running long distances at 75 mph.. it sounds like you had the exact same problem outlined in the original question. using one quart of oil in 200 highway miles adds up to using 4 quarts in 800 miles. i suck at math and even i could figure that one out. yup but as my post said it was about a half quart used on the trip not the entire quart. in any case i think you are missing the point i was putting forth which is that its possible for an engine with nothing wrong other then using more oil then is typical with it to burn that much oil and not smoke. i put 100000 additional miles on mine and it never changed in how it performed and always ran like a top it just used more oil then it should. oil is a heck of a lot cheaper then an engine rebuild that will do nothing but save you the cost of a quart of oil a month. would you spend $2000-3000 to rebuild an engine that didnt foul its plugs or fail emissions or do anything bad but use a little too much oil maybe you would. i certainly wouldnt. -- elbridge gerry of massachusetts what sir is the use of militia it is to prevent the establishment of a standing army the bane of liberty. . . whenever government means to invade the rights and liberties of the people they always attempt to destroy the militia in order to raise a standing army upon its ruins. -- debate u.s. house of representatives august 17 1789 .