Is this normally a political NG ?
From : bill allemann
Q: just curious its normally just about anything while folks sit around and chat while awaiting someone to ask a dodge truck related question. imagin sitting in a room with a bunch of folks and telling them they cant talk about anything but dodge trucks... lol aint gonna happen. fmb north mexico .
Replies:
From : roy
on fri 10 nov 2006 134354 gmt bill allemann custom4173@sbcglobal.netinvalid wrote just curious yeah it is. as well as the just about anything else that comes to mind ng. just a one stop shopping ng. pretty convenient and a pretty decent place most of the time. .
From : roy
jf3489@vermontel.net wrote my son bought this truck a 1996 dakota/4wd/318 auto about 3 months ago and had it checked out by a mechanic who gave it a clean bill of health. he stated to me that he put the truck on the lift and pulled the truck into 4wd and all 4 wheels turned. i cannot make this thing go into 4wd nor can i ever get the 4wd light to work. the 4wd shifter seems to work very hard to me. does anyone have any ideas why dont you go see the mechanic .
From : budd cochran mrd150 preciscom spam net
budd at this even i would have to say that you have crossed a line. how you feel how you think how you wish to worship how you wish to live and base your life on your views of the written word is all fine for you the misses and whom ever else wishes to live that way. these are only right for those that share the same beliefs as you and incase it hasnt been made clear yet not everyone does. and yet im told to tolerate that which the bible says to not tolerate. but for you to say that view other then yours is wrong and is going too far. no not to me. this is not merely a matter or issue of tolerance. i think that everyone has been tolerant until it has been rammed down their throats and i am sorry to say that with this post specifically this line all other views are wrong. that is exactly what you have done. rammed i give up. no one here has the guts to take the responsibility for what they have done to me over my beliefs. really! this is the first time that i have spoken out to you in the group when i felt that you have crossed a line. i have never done any of the things that you have accused the others of doing. so i have no guts i take no responsibility for what i have done what have i done other then try to get you to understand that what you are doing to everyone is to convert them to your way of thinking so no one will disagree with you. sorry my friend i refuse to live my life following someone elses beliefs that i do not agree with and that is how everyone in here feels. this right here is the exact reason i have denounced my roman catholic up bringing. i am a man with a mind and with the ability to think act and judge for myself. and christianity doesnt stop that some denominations like the catholic church do. chritianity sets rules to live by and i have decided to follow those rules for that im catching heck. give me a break budd every religion out there sets rules to live by how ever it is only fundimental christianity and the morons opps mormans that live their life 100% strictly by the book. yes you know i am right. hell my step-daughter converted to morman just to marry a guy and in doing so she gave up a lot of who she was and what she wanted in life. as with you that was her choice we cautioned her to make sure that was what she truly wanted but no one stopped her or forced her to do something she didnt want too. so i have to ask why are you hell bent on converting everyone to your way of life im not but like ive said because of the general prejudice against fundametal christians no one will admit im not doing anything but quoting scripture. fine so be it. quote away! but dont try to force or expect everyone else to feel the same as you! i am sorry my friend but this is how i feel. no apology needed larry. youre being honest and that is good. im being honest with the group and my god and many think thats not good. regardless of that i will always consider you a friend. budd ok since this seems to the real issue lets look at it. . . . i hold the view and belief in the literal interpretation of the bible and it is the inerrant and inspired word of god and this is the right view to have. all other views are wrong. will you tolerate my view -- budd cochran john 316-17 ephesians 28-9 romans 323 623 id rather live assuming there is a god only to die and find out there isnt then to live my whole life assuming there isnt a god only to find out there is. peter barry our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. it is wholly inadequate for the government of any other. john adams -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com .
From : fmb
just curious it is anything you want to discuss. a ot would be polite according to some. roy .
From : beekeep
. 222 325155 4554b080$0$12135$88260bb3@free.tera.com i will not tolerate being told the bible is wrong and that i am wrong for believing it. as for your verse how have you followed it lately -- budd cochran john 316-17 ephesians 28-9 romans 323 623 id rather live assuming there is a god only to die and find out there isnt then to live my whole life assuming there isnt a god only to find out there is. peter barry our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. it is wholly inadequate for the government of any other. john adams ok since this seems to the real issue lets look at it. . . . i hold the view and belief in the literal interpretation of the bible and it is the inerrant and inspired word of god and this is the right view to have. all other views are wrong. will you tolerate my view are you willing to tolerate any one elses ephesians 41-6 -- ---------------------------- -chris 05 ctd 06 liberty crd real trucks dont need spark plugs. -- posted via a free usenet account from http//www.tera.com .
From : craig c
miles wrote taxing anyone who has more than you is not always fairness. agreed. it just seems fair to some folks that the rich should pay more since they are leaching more from the system in one way or another. i have mixed feelings about this. my capitalist said screams unfairness because i happen to pay a great deal of tax due to my situation. however the compassionate side tells me that i should pay more than a struggling single mom or dad or a working student that is learning something that will help the country. productive. ive yet to hear a liberal or democrat state exactly what the limit should be to tax anyone. all they can say is if we need more money then tax the rich some more. no fair limit. its a tough situation. personally i like the idea of abolishing income tax and going to straight federal sales tax. this has many benefits including capturing tax dollars from people that have been able to avoid it like illegal immigrants. it establishes a graduated tax burden the more you have and thus the more you spend the more tax you pay ... and it puts you squarely in control of your tax payout. craig c. .
From : Annonymous
bill allemann wrote just curious ah naw! many things are discussed jesus sex hitler bush polio stem cells crazy people retards etc. like the perfect country-western song we are moving towards being the perfect ng. soon we will talk about momma trains trucks prison and gettin drunk! compliments of mr. david allan coe oh yeah ... occasionally dodge trucks come up. just be patient. those pesky posters will go away on their own. - craig c. .
From : denny
xclimation wrote the real difference between the parties is supply side economics vs. fairness in wealth distribution taxing anyone who has more than you is not always fairness. neither is taking the most money possible from others but that doesnt seem to bother you. why is that miles redistribution of wealth is not the direction this country needs. that may not have been the case a few years ago but with the ever increasing greed of people like yourself.....redistribution needs to happen to keep the country intact and functional. next thing liberals will want is salaries regulated by government. and with the extreme level of greed in this country of some select few i can see why. then they will want salary based on need rather than abilities. what does this even mean punishing people for striving to achieve by taxing the crap out of them is counter productive. what a complete load of shit. when exactly does it change from striving to achieve to just being greedy the war on the middle class has gone on long enough and this shift in power proves it. ive yet to hear a liberal or democrat state exactly what the limit should be to tax anyone. if you want to set limits on one then you should be willing to set limits on the other and you dont. btw i have yet to see a republican or conservative set a fair limit on the amount an upper officer in a company makes in relation to the lower paid employees you know the ones that do the actual work. all they can say is if we need more money then tax the rich some more. no fair limit. when you define a fair limit on compensation then we can define a fair limit on taxation but as long as the endless greed exists something needs to exist to help balance the power. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .