How is London for a Christmas Vacation?

From : cigarski

Q: oops sorry! wrong group. ski .

Replies:

From : geekboy

if it was in a chopper that baby will not do 250. right... but since it was air force one none of that matters... .

From : cigarski

well if it shits to second that a whole different problem... - i have transmission problems.when i take off my truck reves up really high and it goes real slow. is the check engine light on can you get access to an obd-ii code reader to check for any stored codes codes could be present even without a ce light illuminated tv cable adjusted properly what if you take off in manual 1 instead of drive any difference when it shits to 2nd is it any better .

From : jmc

on mon 05 sep 2005 170330 gmt tbone t-bonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote fuck you mike. he should have returned to the white house for appearance sake alone. the appearance of what the apperance of giving a damn. if he could do everything from his texas home there would be no need for the white house at all now would there. how perceptive of you. except for the need to have an offical residence and headquarters for our president technology has made one helluva difference since the white house was rebuilt in 1814 or so. yes it has but if you really think that it is 100% as effective as him being there then you really are a fool. you are surprisingly successful at climbing to new levels of ridiculousness. you amaze me. just when i think that you cant get any more goofy you go and leap ahead. no one and i mean no one well.........maybe except for you gives a shit where the president holds a conference from. not in the least. if you think that they do then you havent been paying any attention at all. now they do care about what the president says and does. then again he wasnt running the recovery efforts. try to grasp that tom. the system is what failed. the system is what needs to get fixed. you want to act like people here are bush worshipers and are biased against what you say becuase of that. this is just another of your many psychological wierdnesses. many people here are not bush fans. they are just more honest than you and have a sense of perspective which would do you a world of good. that is good. people like you will never fix any problems becuase you have so many biases and your mind is so distorted that you cant analyze a situation to figure out what the problem is or was. just basic logic you cant fix a problem if you cant accurately determine what the problem was. just saying tom thats all. he was elected by the people to lead this country and when it is about to be ravaged by this type of storm he should be back at his post. back at what post you do realize that he has all information brought to him personally. he doesnt just sit and watch special tvs. how do you know that the answer is that you dont and this is where the appearance thing comes in. for all i or you know he could have been out fishing while this stuff was going on. i am not saying that he was but there is that appearance thing again. despite modern communications it is not now or ever will be as good as being were he is needed talking face to face with the people that he needs to talk to and giving the apperance to the country that he cares and things will get done not that he will get there when he has the chance after his vactaion. given that you understand his physical location is one of appearances only maybe its time for you to shut the hell up and realize he cannot be everywhere at once. maybe its time you realized that no matter what party he belongs to a president cannot be more than a man who needs a vacation time at home and lots of people and services to bring info to him no matter where he is. bullshit!!!!! while he is president his home is the white house. he is the leader of the most powerful country in the world and much is expected of him. if he cannot handle it he should resign. funny how you expect more of clinton though. even i was making fun of his overflight of the affected area but the fact is he was on the ground asap given the security risks. he did not need to be at the disaster site and i have no problem with the amount of time he took to get there. he should have been at the white house prior to the storm landfall for appearance sake alone and he didnt do it. btw how did this get to be me attacking bush anyway. i dont blame bush for the complete fuckup that this effort has become. oh i see you know as well that this was a disaster and are trying to change the subject rather than agree that this could have and should have been done much better than it was. .

From : geekboy

on mon 05 sep 2005 165330 gmt tbone t-bonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on sun 04 sep 2005 163908 gmt tbone t-bonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote where did i say otherwise. but the president still should have had his ass back in the white house sunday afternoon knowing the impending disaster and his staying on vacation was a major mistake.. you idiot! think about what you just said! with modern communications exactly what could bush not have done at crawford tx that he could have done at the white house no spin no backpedal.... just give us the answer o genius! fuck you mike. he should have returned to the white house for appearance sake alone. if he could do everything from his texas home there would be no need for the white house at all now would there. he was elected by the people to lead this country and when it is about to be ravaged by this type of storm he should be back at his post. despite modern communications it is not now or ever will be as good as being were he is needed talking face to face with the people that he needs to talk to and giving the apperance to the country that he cares and things will get done not that he will get there when he has the chance after his vactaion. fuck you mike yeah i sure dont understand why no one around here likes you. yea he can call me an idiot for speaking my opinion but thats ok huh. yeah in this case the truth is a defense. as for the response to the katrina it was terrible. we thought that we had our planning down but this really shows how much work we have to do. why you blame bush for that is beyond me though. the local state and federal response isnt lead by bush but rather by americans who are supposed to have their shit together. i suspect this will be a wake up call and that there will be some changes. look at beekeeps video. is it bushs fault that two cops where in that walmart looting no bush isnt at fault here you idiot. it was other peoples jobs to get this done not bush. now what i expect bush to do is to kick a whole of ass fire some people and get some people in there that can get the job done. what is it with you fucking retards. where did i say that the entire fault or even 1/5 of the fault is your god bushs you will not be able to answer this because i never said it. sure bush is not completely without blame and there are a few things that he should have done or saw to it being done by he people responsible prior to the storms landfall but he is far from the only one at fault. his major screw-up is in presentation as in not getting back to the white house until long after the disaster and his demeanor when he did give his speech about the efforts being done. he really has to lose that dumb looking smirk when he is under stress. kind of like the dumb sounding tone to your posts huh .

From : geekboy

where did i say otherwise. but the president still should have had his ass back in the white house sunday afternoon knowing the impending disaster and his staying on vacation was a major mistake.. you idiot! think about what you just said! with modern communications exactly what could bush not have done at crawford tx that he could have done at the white house no spin no backpedal.... just give us the answer o genius! fuck you mike. just as i expected... invective instead of clear headed thought.... you are hopeless..... lol sure mike call me names for voicing my opinion against your god and it is ok but get it in response and i am the bad one. now who is the hopeless one -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : jon patrick

hi i have a 2003 quad cab 1500 pick up. i am trying to find out if there is someone who makes conversion to the tailgate. i am looking to replace it with two opening type doors similar to the ford excursion rear arrangement. why you ask . well i have a german sheppard whose back legs are going and the tail gate is two high but with a door arrangement he could use the bumper step on the way up. any help would be appreciated as i live in the uk and this sort of information is hard to get. thank ray bright ive used a ramp for a couple of my shepards through the years. there are a couple that are fiberglass or plastic that hinge in the middle light weight and easy storage. go here www.petco.com search ramps. roy .

From : jmc

hi i have a 2003 quad cab 1500 pick up. i am trying to find out if there is someone who makes conversion to the tailgate. i am looking to replace it with two opening type doors similar to the ford excursion rear arrangement. why you ask . well i have a german sheppard whose back legs are going and the tail gate is two high but with a door arrangement he could use the bumper step on the way up. any help would be appreciated as i live in the uk and this sort of information is hard to get. thank ray bright .