Horns
From : roy
Q: nosey wrote my free speech rights arent in question. its freedom of religion. looking back i see that i made a poor choice of words to explain my thought. i should have used the word authority instead of right. you can tell me that you /think/ im incorrect but you are not in a position to tell me what /is/ correct. your freedom of speech has no authority over my freedom of religion. freedom of speech allows you to string together whatever words you want and blurt them out but you still cant tell me what religious choice to make. you have the ability but you dont have the authority. you can *tell* me what to do but *you* cant tell *me* what to do. if i were so inclined i could *try*! and of course youd have the right to tell me to piss off! smh .
Replies:
From : carolina watercraft works
on feb 6 324 pm roy r...@home.net wrote on feb 6 254 pm roy r...@home.net wrote on feb 6 902 am roy r...@home.net wrote but you learned how to spell the name of the truck you are driving. thanks for proving my point roy. well i figure that if ya come on like a asshole ya get treated like one. maybe you should either lighten up of get a thicker skin. now that i think about it didnt you have a problem with your cruise or od dropping out i remember a deal with the tps brake light switch.... i believe you received the help you needed with no problem. but then again i could be wrong impossible you practice buddism! ya friggin heathen! with buddism ya can say and do whatever the hell ya want and be correct. if ya want i suppose i can google our offended mr. ring and see if im correct or not. blah blah blah. i am starting to think all the brow beating from budd has converted you roy. bg im not converted to anything. but i was shown a way to do say anything ya want and always be correct. i just named it buddism after its chief practicioner. hey it works since i am the one that has been accused of being offensive how could he be offended if i have never talked to him i went through google and didnt see the post he was talking about. the hell with it. .
From : stephen harding
on feb 6 254 pm roy r...@home.net wrote on feb 6 902 am roy r...@home.net wrote but you learned how to spell the name of the truck you are driving. thanks for proving my point roy. well i figure that if ya come on like a asshole ya get treated like one. maybe you should either lighten up of get a thicker skin. now that i think about it didnt you have a problem with your cruise or od dropping out i remember a deal with the tps brake light switch.... i believe you received the help you needed with no problem. but then again i could be wrong impossible you practice buddism! ya friggin heathen! with buddism ya can say and do whatever the hell ya want and be correct. if ya want i suppose i can google our offended mr. ring and see if im correct or not. damn!!! i was right! mr ring posted on the 24th of dec about a od prob. both myself and tom l answered him. on the 26th he posted that it was the brake light switch was the culpert. i mentioned on the 24th. as being the cheapest fix. yup im an ass hole. one with a long memory. .
From : roy
budd cochran wrote as a christian that believes the word of god to be true and accurate i have to be truthful also to everyone. to lie is a sin. mormonism is full of lies that have been disproved many time by the secular world book of abraham revised hieroglyphics language for just two items catholics have added much to christianity which is not supported by scripture just a couple purgatory the magical eucharist and in the pentacostal denominations one claims they can teach you to speak in tongues a prayer language is a gift from god and personal in nature another says you have to speak in tongues to be saved not supported by scripture and most dont interpret the tongue being babbeled according to scripture if one speaks in an unknown tongue let one or two interpret if many speak in an unknown tongue would a stranger think you to be mad and even the apostle paul said i would rather speak five words to your understanding than ten thousand in an unknown tongue. the scripture is written by who god wasnt it was man writing the word of god what if a man hears another message from god it cant be written into the scripture because the scripture is closed. so if it isnt in the scripture it cant be true did god say that he will never speak to man again after the writing of the scripture is complete you claim to follow the word of god but you wont believe anything less than 2000 years old. if you doubt any man that claims to hear the word of god now why do you believe what was written so long ago no christian source denies the bible was written by many men who were inspired by god. if a person can be inspired to write a famous poem about a tree a part of creation why couldnt the creater inspire men to write about him accurately the bible covers this when in matthew iirc jesus talked to the crowd about not following if someone comes along and says the messiah is in the desert another messiah. iow if another comes along claiming to have found a messiah and not the one found in the bible then dont believe them. this is what joseph smith has done and what makes it even more odd they teach the bible is incorrect yet they use selected portions to prove themselves always out of context. to compound the matter none of their doctrinal books doctrine and covenants for example even follows the book of mormon which teaches a triune god not polytheism. the palmyra new york court system has on record convictions against joseph smith as a fortune teller diviner fortune finder and con artist. it is recorded that he married multiple wives after sending their husbands on missions for the church yet claimed he did no such thing lying. jesus before he began his ministry was a carpenter. which would you find more believable a crook or a carpenter why was that carpenter nailed up on a cross according to the bible jesus was fully god and fully man conceived by the power of the holy spirit and not thru sex with the holy spiritas the lds believe. he lived a sinless life as a child in nazareth and was taught his eartly fathers trade carpentry. he came to teach man the truth that we are not worthy of gods notice that we cannot become worthy of gods love by our efforts to love one another to do all we can for each other even our enemies. to make us acceptable sinless for gods love and a place with god in heaven he was the sacrifice for all of mankinds sins on the cross to erase those sins. three days later by the jewish reckoning of days he rose from the dead to bring us as believers eternal life with god in glory be it the time in heaven or in the new jerusalem. before he returned to heaven and the right hand of god he commissioned all believers to spread the truth correct and rebuke errors and watch for his return. why was he nailed up to the cross for you and me and t-bone and larry and roy and everyone else. in ii timothy 4 1-4 paul teaches that in the latter days men will allow strange non-christian doctrines to be taught as being christian and thusly pollute the word of god and that christians are called to rebuke those that would corrupt gods word. this is the crux of the matter. nowhere did i tell anyone anything that was not found in the bible which is my only source for answers. nowhere did i say to anyone they were going to hell unless the bible said they were and i only stated what the bible said. i am but the messenger in that respect. you claimed that you can only judge non-christians. telling or quoting the bible to a non-christian that they are going to hell is an empty threat for the most part. the only people that will take it with any meaning is other christians who you cant judge. why bother bringing it up because christians are supposed to tell the un-saved of their destiny in hopes they will turn to god the great commision is for all believers and no where does the bible say only selected individuals can pr
From : stephen harding
roy wrote mike steve is a country yankee. lives about 80 miles west of me. indeed. in the more tranquil and sedate and civilized part of massachusetts! where car horns are an aberration and anyone using one in a long blast immediately identifies himself as being from boston and a pariah to be shunned. boy with this 0 degree weather these seat are wonderful. i wonder how wide ride is doing with his. i generally bike commute the 10-11 miles each way to work. yesterday coming in i broke a chain just short of the office. got a ride home with a coworker in his subaru forrester... with heated seats! my very first exposure to this decadent feature of infernal combustion engineering! i liked it!!! gotta figure out how to put one on my bike! how warm can i get a bike saddle with 6v/3w bottle generator one of my bikes has a home brew 20w headlight powered by a 12v about 20amp i think motorcycle battery. how well might that sort of power toast my buns smh .
From : roy
on feb 6 254 pm roy r...@home.net wrote on feb 6 902 am roy r...@home.net wrote but you learned how to spell the name of the truck you are driving. thanks for proving my point roy. well i figure that if ya come on like a asshole ya get treated like one. maybe you should either lighten up of get a thicker skin. now that i think about it didnt you have a problem with your cruise or od dropping out i remember a deal with the tps brake light switch.... i believe you received the help you needed with no problem. but then again i could be wrong impossible you practice buddism! .
From : mike simmons
on feb 6 902 am roy r...@home.net wrote but you learned how to spell the name of the truck you are driving. thanks for proving my point roy. well i figure that if ya come on like a asshole ya get treated like one. maybe you should either lighten up of get a thicker skin. now that i think about it didnt you have a problem with your cruise or od dropping out i remember a deal with the tps brake light switch.... i believe you received the help you needed with no problem. but then again i could be wrong. .
From : roy
tom lawrence wrote anybody have any thoughts on replacement horns. not for a truck but a car. both the horns on the magnum and the charger are weak. im looking for a plug in not air. ive looked at griots but would like more options. tia http//www.jcwhitney.com/autoparts/product/tf-browse/s-10101/pr-pproduct.catentryid2009014/p-2009014/n-111+10201+600002595/c-10101 always had a compulsion to have air horns on my truck even though im overall against horns on cars rarely ever really needed and a long blast even more rarely so. theres probably some standard for car horns somewhere but i think it should be impossible to lay on the horn! it should issue an initial couple second blast then beep intermittently after that even when holding down the button. much more soothing and in congested traffic less grating on the ears. smh stephen yankees drive with their horns theyd be lost without em. ;^ mike .
From : stephen harding
i bought a new 2006 quad cab dodge dakota st 4x4 for $25000 just this past september. it turns out that it doesnt fit my personality at all. it only has 4500 miles and is less than 6 months old and now places want to give me $14000 in trade in. i am dumb-founded! -- tim mcbride a.k.a. numan .
From : roy
on feb 6 1126 am chris thompson kf4drr-nos...@alltel.net wrote yup thats the way my 05 was. my 2004 as well. craig c. hey craig! how ya doin man -- ---------------------------- -chris 05 ctd 06 liberty crd real trucks dont need spark plugs. .
From : tom lawrence
on feb 6 1255 am geekboy w...@nerdy.com wrote that i thought aadt use bad about questions not being answered or some jackass jumping to offer a smartass remark to your answers! that group takes the fucking cake! i would be angry and an asshole if i bought a chevy also. see the funny thing is that when i had my ram i had problem after problem with it and all it did was change the exhaust. i have had the chevy longer its a 4wd and i have less problems. now i will say that when i get rid of it and get my diesel it will not be a chevy/ gmc and if dodge doesnt drastically change the design of the quad cab for comfort and room issues i will most likely be getting ford. yeah i know there is the mega cab which has more room but i do not feel the same level of comfort in the dodge or gm as in the fords and yes i have crawled in worked in and drove all of them. .
From : stephen harding
on thu 08 feb 2007 231521 +0930 jmc nogroupsspam@nojodibody.homeus wrote well yall almost lost a poster yesterday... ive been on vacation tasmania for the curious and the trucks been sitting quietly here at home. fortunately i was in a parking lot when the huntsman spider 1 whod taken up residence under the hood crawled out to hide behind the drivers side mirror! it wasnt the biggest spider ive ever seen perhaps 4 across but pretty damn big when ones peripheral vision and primitive instinct registers it! nearly had a heart attack and did come to a screeching halt i was going all of 5mph until i realized it was outside the window... 1 http//www.amonline.net.au/factsheets/huntsmanspiders.htm huntsman spiders are large long-legged spiders measuring up to 15 cm 6 across the legs. holy cow! bite huntsman spider bites usually result only in transient local pain and swelling. however some badge huntsman spider bites have caused prolonged pain inflammation headache vomiting and irregular pulse rate. pal id be doing whatever i had to in order to find any egg sac that thing might have left behind and then to go absolutely primitive on it. that thing is nasty. .
From : denny
max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote nice job of showing that *exactly* what i said was precisely true! if you had looked at my original source you would have found that its among those you now find credible. i told you that all of the figures are from the usgs. you denied it and claimed you have newer data. you dont. *all* of your sources are simply grabbing numbers from the usgs and distorting them. what you claimed was *wrong*. what your sources claimed was *wrong*. and no i did *not* say your source was credible. i said they lied and so do you. you made several false statements. ive shown them to be false. i made many statements and every single one of them has been shown to be precisely correct. you now admit that the only data available is exactly the data that i had cited that you do not have any newer or better data. id told you that people distort the usgs report and gave you details of exactly what they distort... and you cite *exactly* the distortions that i mentioned. yes people do distort the reports including yourself. if i were distorting the report you would of course be able to show exactly what and where the distortion was. you dont even try to do that... because you *know* it wont fly. so instead you lie about it. you also distort my actual point since you never understood it to begin with. you might want to return to my original reply to snohead. none of your points in any discussion with me have been valid. none have been supported by facts and all have been traced to one unreliable source or another trying to distort what the usgs says. there is no dispute that there is oil in the anwr despite your alarmist there are *zero* proven reserves in anwr. that means there *is* a dispute about whether there is any oil there at all. nobody knows of a single drop of oil in anwr. we do *not* *know* there is oil in anwr. reaction and by your own sources. in fact at the rate of recovery supposed to be available via the cost per barrel there is more recoverable that is suggested in the reports due to the increased price of oil. how do you figure that the rate of recovery has *nothing* to do with how much oil is recoverable. and via the cost per barrel is a nonsense phrase. you are making up mumbo jumbo statements hoping that in the confusion you sound good. thus the figure which you are citing could be much more at this time that it was at the time of the report. how can you justify that statement the report was issued in 1999. there has been no research in anwr since 1985. it includes all of the known and currently used technology that has been developed for arctic oil production over the past 30 years. you cannot cite a single specific that would point at an increased in the figures provided by the usgs. so again the amount of oil is debateable. many factors which you refuse to acknowledge are causing this variation. the amount is open to question within the range specified by the usgs. name even *one* of these many factors! you cant because there are none. but again the point is not the quantity but the fact that it is there. what is there there are *zero* proven reserves in anwr. you know dont you ! that the npr-a is supposed to have just about the same amount of oil as anwr the usgs reports for the npr-a say just about the same thing they do for anwr. same amounts same type of expected discoveries nothing big like prudhoe or kuparuk. are you aware that there has been exploratory drilling in the npr-a since the 1940s and there has yet to be a single reservoir found that is large enough to produce. we could be poking holes in anwr for the next 60-70 years without finding anything there either. just in case you dont have a clue what the national petroleum reserve -- alaska is it is the area west of prudhoe bay and is of course similar in many ways to anwr the area east of prudhoe bay. as i said this is all about *my* backyard. ive been a full time resident of the north slope for several years and as is not uncommon here i am well aware of what the oil industry is doing. it is a perspective that you do not come close to matching. bullshit. you may be able to actually see the equipment but the reports you read are the same ones i can read. you cant read. you dont seem to be able to relate this stuff to reality. you clearly do not have the same perspective on it that just about *everyone* here gets. now i repeat would you like to debate the points ive made or your proximity to large oil drilling equipment when are you going to make a point you have made up all sorts of distortions *none* of which you can support with accurate data. telling lies that cannot be supported is *not* making points... -- floyd l. davidson http//www.apaflo.com/floyddavidson ukpeagvik barrow alaska floyd@apaflo.com
From : roy
hi i am interested in buying a dodge ram diesel 2500 or 3500 single or dually about 5 years old or so with a manual transmission. i understand there are 5 and 6 speed manuals. i would like a truck that is nice to drive on a long highway trip but can also carry a nice load and/or pull say a 60000-80000 lb. loaded trailer. does a manual get better fuel economy and are the automatics reliable what models/options/years must be avoided thanks in advance. land olakes fred any year truck should work for what your asking. the autos a very reliable as are the standard shifts. if i had a choice between 2 standard shifts one 5 and one 6 id go with the 6. the 5 speeds had a problem with the nut holding 5th gear in place backing off over time and then you would loose 5th. its not a big deal to fix it but its something to keep in mind. anything you get i would recomend making sure its got limited slip diferential lsd even the older cummins engines had enough torque to easily sit and spin a open diff without even trying. as far as fuel milage your biggest consideration there is the power output. the 12v probably get the best older less power rating then the older 24v next i forget the hp on these but they were higher than the 12v and next was the 325/610hp 24v found in the 3rd gen trucks of course more power still but to get power you have to burn more fuel. my 05 3rd gen still gets around 20 mpg depending on how im driving it. ive heard some with older trucks claim upwards of 25mpg. in my opinion the hp rating of the truck is you biggest factor in fuel milage. by the way your only wanting to pull 8000lbs according to your post you may find the ride of a 3/4 ton truck 2500 series softer and more comfrortable than the 1 ton 3500 series and the 3/4 will be more than enough truck to pull the load your asking as i understand it. just my 2c -- ---------------------------- -chris 05 ctd 06 liberty crd real trucks dont need spark plugs. .
From : stephen harding
roy wrote damn steve use your truck until it gets to 20 above will ya. hah! its actually not as bad as many people think. bs!!! it is worse than people think!! vbg ive worked out side for probably 30 years. i agree with layering and lol bean and deluth. but after a few hours out in 10 or below with wind blowing it flat out sucks!!! the old truism dress in layers. lots of really good warm/dry fabrics out there now that really help you keep warm in the cold. but a heated bicycle sea roy smh .
From : mike simmons
after takin a swig o grog the ghost in the machine belched out this bit o wisdom im old enough to remember the close icon being in the upper left for example; amiga and athena had some interesting ideas about scroll bars. with xfce you can put them wherever you want on the title bar. scrollbars could also be shifted by clicking in the trench. is that like the kde/fluxbox slit or the xfce/gnome dock my god you type a lot. -- convert your billy-box to a linus-box today! .
From : chris thompson
yep.... best you probably try to sell it yourself.... check kbb.com to see what they say. i bought a new 2006 quad cab dodge dakota st 4x4 for $25000 just this past september. it turns out that it doesnt fit my personality at all. it only has 4500 miles and is less than 6 months old and now places want to give me $14000 in trade in. i am dumb-founded! -- tim mcbride a.k.a. numan .
From : stephen harding
get a flashlight & look around behind the radiator support on the passenger side. mine was well hidden as the previous owner didnt use it. you should be able to follow the cord back from the middle of the engine block on the passenger side about half way down. .