Got a hemi?????

From : redneck tookover hell

Q: tbone wrote the point of the tax if it ever comes to be is to make people think beefore collecting a fleet of junk cars. then whoever thought of that solution is a moron or has another agenda. as has been mentioned several times already in this thread there are any number of laws that can and have been enacted to control abusive parking of junk cars that do not also penalize those who are doing nothing wrong as a blanket tax would. .

Replies:

From : bryan swadener

thanks for the great insight a**h***... is your life so bad i feel sorry for you.. i cant imagine going through life with absolutley no use but this!!! oh and if you ever need someone to tell you to fo give me a call... mark www.getalife.com anyone know of a website were i can track the building process mark. .

From : roy

on thu 26 feb 2004 121830 gmt roy roy@home.net wrote roy wrote i would think that what makes really your week is the chance to avail yourself to a civil union. enjoy!!!! i do plan to enjoy my weekend roy thank you. got a lot of things to do. you really dont want to play do ya thats okay puss you have truly shown what ya are. please go and enjoy your weekend. hey roy hate to tell you this but your starting to sound like a couple snowballs that hung out in here here 2 or 3 years ago. time to chill out dont ya think........... jerry you are probably right it was becoming tiresome. roy gee ya think yes pussy i do. you proved to have absolutely nothing at all to offer either mechanically or with regard to one liners. oh fyi i didnt choose your new name consensus was the pussy fit you best. anyway you proved to me and everyone else what ya are run along im done with you. gotta be sad to be you. .

From : roy

tbone wrote yep and the fact that the law doesnt take into account renovations and additions to the house that significantly raise its value is a loop hole. loop hole to what......... your socialist agenda to redistribute the wealth. hahahahahahahaha hehehehehehehehe wow what a pinhead. didnt you say that the purpose of the law was to prevent older people from being taxed out of their homes. what does that have to do with protecting people from tax increases due to major improvements and additions to the home after the sale how many old people on a fixed income can afford to make these types of changes dont be stupid most buy their homes when their families are young and they grow into retirement in the same home building and adding as they go. so what do people not increae their salaries and position in life as they grow into retierment the law was to protect the elderly not the growing family according to you or was that just another one of your fabrications before you even try to generate yet another bullshit response it doesnt and none of them. if they can then they dont realy need the protection do they. that is just a loop hole that no doubt was created by omission by wealthy people for other wealthy people to .... and you managed to capitalize on it as well. like i said more power to you. spoken like a true socialist jackass. and replied to like a typical right wing isolationist asshole. i never said that the law didnt exist but i know that you are lacking in the comprehention department. i said that your taxes are based on what your house is worth and that is still the way it is. i wouldnt complain about someones comprehension after the above. read my lips dummy they are taxed on what the original purchase price was not the present value. try reading the entire statement or did your mommy have to take a bathroom break before reading the rest of it to you. all your california law does is lock it in at the worth at time of purchase but the tax amount was still bases on the worth of the house at the time of sale. what is stupid about the law is that it doesnt take into account additiions and renovations that can and do significantly raise the value of the house after the sale. burns your ass that even a left wing state like california is not as screwed up as you are huh............. really they look pretty screwed up to me. funny how such a left wing state would elect arnold as the new govenor and all i see him doing is cutting services. and you are still with your gun toten isolationist friends and crying about the evil gubberment is taking your money and rights away and how it should be gotten rid of. you bet wanna come take them from me lol take what from you jerry your manhood you would actually have to have that first. here in the great state of nc you pay a property tax on all of your vehicles. thats ncs problem but im sure you love them for it. not really but there is little that i can do about it. but like you i canget around it for now. both of my cars are still registered and insured in nj so that tax doesnt apply to me this year. home depot may deliver for an extra charge but they dont cart around furniture that i build for me and they dont go to the land fill for me either. wow old tommy is building his own furniture and from all those poor trees that need protecting. yep but what does that have to do with the bs that many lumber mills say. funny how they claim that they need to thin the forest and then only cut the large healthy trees while leaving the sickly ones and under brush the real cause of the fires right where it was. land fill hell you mean your are not letting your city comrades tax you for pickup service so you can claim to be recycling like a good little fellow. garbage collection in my town in nj was paid for by my property taxes. here in nc it is a seperate charge to an independant collection agency. either way they only collect certian things and what they dont still needs to go to the land fill that also does recycling. keep going tommy im enjoying watching you step in your own shit. invent some more bullshit for us. what are you talking about you sure are funny when you get desperate. if you were actually paying attention you would know that these new proposals taki into account the need for a spare car and dont tax for it either. one proposal was for 1 spare car per household and the other was for 1 spare car per driver. it is not your right to decide how many cars i need or want. take a look around you tommy this is america not china. lol. if the number of cars that you own effect the way that i live my life then it damn well is my right to influence those actions regardless of where we are. you dont have a clue how much or for what i use my truck for

From : redneck tookover hell

hey mike s..........is 2 prime the normal upshift second or is it the kick-down second 2nd prime is used when downshifting from 4th to 2nd ie. romping on it. upshifting from 1st to 2nd uses the primary 2nd gear ratio .