Durango w/ miss while A/C compressor on

From : Annonymous

Q: beryl wrote i believe your sentence above contains a glaring dangling modifier. i was aware that the sentence had a spoken quality as i wrote it. i like it that way. if i were a gambling man id bet that larry azwiley would prefer that you communicate that spoken quality verbally and in person. you could try getting along. then others besides yourself might like what you have to say. craig c. .

Replies:

From : tbone

then my suggestion would be not to read it or are you the new use net nanny -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving gentlemen i am happily subscribed to the chevy truck groups. i care not a wit what ford dodge or toyota did or does with or to their trucks. please refrain from cross-posting to the chevy truck groups. thanks regards jr i think the $2b lawsuit is nothing more than to catch fords attention and attempt to force ford to honor existing engine contracts. from what ive read it is based on navistars opinion that ford is moving forward with plans to design and build their own diesel engine rather than continue to purchase them from navistar. apparently there is a contract clause that prohibits ford from doing so until after 2012. it will get tanglefooted because i am sure that ford being solely dependent on navistar insisted on having certain performance related obligations imposed on navistar as well. certainly its an attention-getter. but in the corporate world frivolous lawsuits arent the method of operation. clearly again navistar feels its got good ground to stand on for the dollar figure. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author the whole situation is a big mess and interconnected. ford claims that the reason they were witholding payments was because navistar was in breach of *their* contractual obligation to absorb some of the warranty repair costs associated with the 6.0l engine. precisely. thus the claim that navistar has nothing and the suit will fall apart is a bit short sighted. if it were that easy to come to a decision certainly navistar and its lawyers would not have filed papers to begin with. what signifies this action as solidly based and a huge threat to ford is the dollar amount. a supplier such as navistar doesnt bite the hand that feeds it simply because it seems like the thing to do. navistars reputation and financial status may well be on the line here and they undoubtedly feel its worth taking action. the real point is ford is on shakey ground to begin with now a $2b lawsuit will at very least sap their cash reserves let alone the effects of an adverse judgement. i think the $2b lawsuit is nothing more than to catch fords attention and attempt to force ford to honor existing engine contracts. from what ive read it is based on navistars opinion that ford is moving forward with plans to design and build their own diesel engine rather than continue to purchase them from navistar. apparently there is a contract clause that prohibits ford from doing so until after 2012. it will get tanglefooted because i am sure that ford being solely dependent on navistar insisted on having certain performance related obligations imposed on navistar as well. eisboch . 222 334646 463fa516$0$18887$4c368faf@roadrunner.com what is the idle rpm with the compressor on -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving i have a 2000 dodge durango with 165k on it. i noticed recently with the a/c on it ides rough sounds like a miss in the engine. anyone have any ideas .