Do You Want To Know For Sure That You Are Going To Heaven? The

From : taylor

Q: nightbat rongrossi382552@yahoo.com wrote the reason some people dont know for sure if they are going to heaven when they die is because they just dont know. snip nightbat then tell them to override the 2012 wormwood predicted earth end and get on the darla star ship pickup list where they can theoretically live forever in space heaven. for remember per referenced historical xtian good book new testament amen i say onto you that some of you who are with me now will never taste death . ponder on the nightbat .

Replies:

From : nightbat

on tue 19 apr 2005 172425 gmt tbone t-bonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote nothing fuzzy about it you might want to pull out the 4th grade math book the one with dick and jane and spot on it and do some reading from what i am reading from you here i can see that dick and jane is about as far as you got in your education. then ask yourself is this a true statement 0.03 / 0.02 = 1.5 yes or no sure it does but the real question is what does .03 and .02 stand for on their own and the answer is nothing at all. and if they stand for nothing as is what in the hell does the 1.5 you get by dividing them stand for i think that you will find the answer is the same as the last one nothing. for this reason alone it either shows a failure in your logic or that you are a graduate in the gwb fuzzy math academy. your calculation is nothing more than a percentage of a percentage and when you do that you lose just about all valid meaning. for the momory-impaired such as yourself 0.03 stands for amount of dirt 3 % allowed to pass by a k&n and 0.02 2% is the amount passed by an oem filter therefore a k&n pases 150 % or 50 % more dirt than an oem get up to speed will ya once again your logic fails. as i said you are taking a percentage of percentages which has no valid meaning in itself. then on top of that your wording is wrong. if we were to use your logic it would let in 150% as much dirt as a paper filter not more than a paper one. if it was 150% more then it would be allowing 2 .5 times the dirt as paper and this is not true. it lets in up to 1.5 times as much dirt but when you look at how little dirt the paper element lets in 1.5 times just about nothing is still just about nothing. any way that you want to look at it from a valid baseline the k&n will allow up to 1% more dirt in than a high quality paper filter big deal. yes and that 1 % is 50 per cent more lol yes but it is still fuzzy math because there is no way to know if this huge difference is because the k&n is really bad or that the paper filter is really good. you want it to make the k&n sound horrible when in fact it is damn close to the paper filter only 1% less effective wrong einstein nope. paper filter at 2% k&n at 3%. 3 - 2 still equals 1 the last time i checked it out. it passes 50% more dirt than an oem 0.03 / 0.02 = 1.50 so what it still only passes 1% more dirt in total volume than the oem any way that you try to spin it. and still within factory spec.. btw now you are saying 50% more when befor it was 150% more. make up your mind or at least get your english correct. you know when i have to re-phrase it so even you can understand it then its time for you to admit youre in over your head it is not a matter of re-phrasing it it is more of a matter of stating it correctly. there really is a big difference between 50% more and 150% more like a 100% difference. it really seems like with so many other times the one over his head happens to be you. btw where exactly is that clockspring look this isnt even a big deal. but................. if 100 particles try to reach your engine the paper filter stops 98 of them and the k&n stops 97. 2 get thru for paper 3 for k&n. if 1000 particles try to reach your engine the paper filter stops 980 of them and the k&n stops 970. 20 get thru for paper 30 for k&n. now i was never a math major but i think that means that the paper filter stops 1% more of the particles. as far as particles getting thru it is what is left but you can construe that to say that 50% more particles get thru the k&n than the paper iif you want to. but it is only 1% more of the total particles that have tried to get thru. just thought id point that out. not that anyone gives a shit. i mean this just gets in the middle of good fight i think therefore a k&n passes 150 % as much as or 50 % more dirt than an oem while true it is still meaningless unless you know exactly how much the oem passes thru and once you realize that an oem lets just about nothing thru 150% of just about nothing is still just about nothing. reduced to semantic flames are you perhaps ypu should look up the definition of semantics before you fire up your accusations. this is not a matter of semantics becuaes what you said is simply wrong. face up to it for a change. .

From : nightbat

suddenly without warning hodad exclaimed 4/15/2005 452 am thanks for the input. mine is also a slt but just reg cab. a friend gets 21 mpg in the city and he has a big motor vette. go figer. price is 2.07 a gallon here in massachusetts usa. i will be using my harley more this summer. steve youre quite lucky with your gas prices. today in southern oregon its at $2.57/gallon regular. hd normally id be all sympathy but i think my $6.50 /gal uk has you trumped. that said thats a huge amount for gas in the us! yikes! jmc .