Dakota Diesel? Tbone wrong? How could it be?

From : max dodge

Q: i take it then tbone that youve got nothing to say on the facts that you neglected to look at on the site you provided this is just one more case of you being wrong and failing to admit it. -- max there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author no it just works differently in maxworld - -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving . odor while driving is non existant. i cant smell my trucks exhaust unless i stand directly next to the tailpipe and the air is relatively still. your sniffer aint workin too good. hd .

Replies:

From : tbone

i take it then tbone that youve got nothing to say on the facts that you neglected to look at on the site you provided i did look and as usual you got it wrong. while the rule itself may have been brought into effect the steps within the rule have dates of there own as to when they need to be implemented. since this document was itself written in 2001 unless they had a crystal ball there was no way for them to know the current oil situation which makes there estimate of little to no cost increase completely invalid which follows along the same lines of most of your arguments including this one completely worthless. perhaps you might want to look at both cummins and cat to see the changes they have planned for 2007 due to these rule changes that you seem to think have already occurred lol! this is just one more case of you being wrong and failing to admit it. no max it is simply a case of learning from my past mistakes and one of them is arguing with you since you are way to much of a pussy to ever admit to error of any kind. i was not wrong here as the rule itself sets times for various things to take effect and nothing at all will happen until the rule itself becomes effective so by definition the rule has to be put into effect at the same time if not before any of its regulations can be but there is none that says all its regulations take effect at the time the rule is effective. sorry max but you can add another one to your loss column. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : max dodge

i did look and as usual you got it wrong. while the rule itself may have been brought into effect the steps within the rule have dates of there own as to when they need to be implemented. yup thats why in 2001 all the major diesel manufacturers and the fuel companies had a big conference and decided what they needed to do to be compliant early. since this document was itself written in 2001 unless they had a crystal ball there was no way for them to know the current oil situation which makes there estimate of little to no cost increase completely invalid which follows along the same lines of most of your arguments including this one completely worthless. again wrong. since the increase was not expressed in any finite figures it would be hard to determine exactly how much of the recent increses had anything to do with the new ultra low sulphur requirements. one thing is sure the low sulphur requirements of 2001 certainly had nothing to do with the latest increase in fuel prices nor with any to come despite your claims. perhaps you might want to look at both cummins and cat to see the changes they have planned for 2007 due to these rule changes that you seem to think have already occurred lol! perhaps you might want to read about the requirements before you make any silly claims. cummins says on their website that they are compliant with the changes that took place last year you did know about those right and the changes you seem to think are destined for 2007 are in place as of october of 2006. there is yet another teir to be put in place in 2010. thus all this happyhorseshit you keep talking about has been phased in since 2001 with no radicla increase in price. no max it is simply a case of learning from my past mistakes and one of them is arguing with you since you are way to much of a pussy to ever admit to error of any kind. why admit error when clearly you were wrong you claimed that diesel in a dakota would be a terrible thing. it isnt. you were shown proof by several people. in the end it came down to your nose telling you it smelled bad. no matter what you claim your nose isnt an expert on diesel engines or fuel requirements. i was not wrong here as the rule itself sets times for various things to take effect and nothing at all will happen until the rule itself becomes effective incorrect. all you need do is visit cummins engines website and take a look at the press releases from 2003-2005 and youll see that they are way ahead of the changes you are so concerned about. so by definition the rule has to be put into effect at the same time if not before any of its regulations can be but there is none that says all its regulations take effect at the time the rule is effective. well i guess you need to take a closer look at how things happened since all diesel manufacturers both engine and fuel worked to beat the deadlines set by the regs. sorry max but you can add another one to your loss column. not until you post proof. ive posted mine and shown you where a whole archive of proof exists time for you to go read. -- max there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author i take it then tbone that youve got nothing to say on the facts that you neglected to look at on the site you provided i did look and as usual you got it wrong. while the rule itself may have been brought into effect the steps within the rule have dates of there own as to when they need to be implemented. since this document was itself written in 2001 unless they had a crystal ball there was no way for them to know the current oil situation which makes there estimate of little to no cost increase completely invalid which follows along the same lines of most of your arguments including this one completely worthless. perhaps you might want to look at both cummins and cat to see the changes they have planned for 2007 due to these rule changes that you seem to think have already occurred lol! this is just one more case of you being wrong and failing to admit it. no max it is simply a case of learning from my past mistakes and one of them is arguing with you since you are way to much of a pussy to ever admit to error of any kind. i was not wrong here as the rule itself sets times for various things to take effect and nothing at all will happen until the rule itself becomes effective so by definition the rule has to be put into effect at the same time if not before any of its regulations can be but there is none that says all its regulations take effect at the time the rule is effective. sorry max but you can add another one to your loss column. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .