DOUBLE HELP - PLEASE

From : newsreader

Q: haynes repair manual dodge dakota pick-ups 1987-1996 .

Replies:

From : webmaster carolinabreezehvac com

damn near thinking about it i tell you!!! weve just put in nearly $1000 into this old beast. .

From : newsreader

tbone wrote spinning again dude the only one not making sence here is you. the fact is the national average was 12000 a few years ago and hasnt gone up all that much since then. ok so the national average car wont have 100k on it. look tbone you are seriously the one spinning here. we are not talking about averages here so why bring them up there should be many 2 to 3 year old hybrids with well above average mileage just as there are many 2 to 3 year old cars of all kinds with mileage. my neighbors econo car is a 2003 and has 102k on it. national averages make his car mileage impossible dang leftist rant and spin. lol if you spin any faster you could alter the earths orbit. while im sure that there are many hybrids with mileage above the national average i doubt that there are a whole lot of them at 3 times it and that is about what would need to be done to be above 100000 already. like i said before you are claiming the ridiculous to be the norm. even if a few of them have reached 100000 or failed along the way how are we going to know about it do you publish the history of your vehicles or is this just another example of the ridiculous claimed to be norm. it will take another 3 to 5 years to see realistically see how well the hybrids built in the last three years have performed. hahahahahahaha how many conservative republican tree huggers do you know you think only liberal tree huggers buy econo cars get real tbone and quit squitming and spinning. you were the one that pointed to conservative republicans to be the definition of tree hugger. i just thought that it was funny. the fact that you defended yourself this way shows who is really the one squirming and spinning. sorry miles but the type of person that would buy a hybrid vehicle when they were still very new and untested were probably not driving them 25000 miles a year. people who buy econo cars often do so because of very long commutes. 25k+ for any econo car is quite common. and you have the facts to back this 25k+ crap up where sorry to burst your bubble once again miles but the few that really do and need to put this type of mileage on their vehicles are highly unlikely to place their faith in still somewhat unproven technology especially with the known limitations of the really high mileage ones. yea how many excluding rental cars lets see some actual facts from you for a change. so you think the national average is the maximum people drive you do know what average is right tbone like i thought no facts provided just more spin. once again that would be you dude. to have any significant number of these vehicles above 100000 would require many of them to be driven 30000 miles a year or more and this is simply unrealistic. i just asked you to show me some hybrids that have lasted. perhaps you should show some that have not. the fact is that it is just too soon to get valid numbers. anyone that would already be above 100000 miles in 3 years or less are simply abusing the vehicle and are not an accurate representation of their reliability as they were designed. because the time is going to come and sooner than you think where we the world are going to start running out and i would rather have the majority of the available supply under our control because that is the only time when it is really going to matter. but according to you we should have all sorts of new technologies out by then and not need our oil. plus you liberals refuse to allow any of our oil to even be found. majority of oil where you wont let anyone know where. so here you are now worried about our oil you are spinning so fast now that your are starting to get me dizzy. there is no guarantee that we will have anything in the next 20 years or ever for that matter. but i can guarantee that unless there is some serious motivation to look for them fear and greed it simply will not happen. everything that you posted in this thread so far more than proves it. but going by what you say if we do develop these new technologies then we will not need the oil so why spend the money time and risk to the environment looking for it when so many others already are and if these new technologies do not work out we will still have some. there are many oil wells in texas that are not being pumped or drilled because it is simply not worth it since we can currently buy it cheaper than we can drill and pump it so we do have some wiggle room already. hahahahaha at out current usage and rate of increasing consumption you are dreaming if you really think that we have decades of it left. then per your above statement that we need to have control over the majority of available supply you liberals need to allow us to find that majority supply. i have no problem with that but the oil companies have shown time and time again that they cannot be