Check Engine Light code 2002 Dodge Ram 4.7L V8

From : brian

Q: max dodge wrote i believe miles point was that in certain instances developments were being built with specific rules that went beyond what i believe to be constitutional. in these developments the rules stood legal challenge because they were put into effect as part of the neighborhood and the individual retained the right to live elsewhere. in addition to cc&rs deed restrictions or zoning regulations theres also private home owners associations. they make such rules and are approved by the residents of a neighborhood to keep property values up as well as create the environment the people who buy there want. point is there are reasons for restrictions and many home owners do want them enforced. .

Replies:

From : brian

jmc wrote also wasnt sure if win2kpro would be able to fully utilize the two procs i have now... for most users dual cpus are useless. along with an os that can use both they will also only speed up applications designed to spawn processes off to the 2nd cpu. otherwise the 2nd cpu sits and does nothing. .

From : tbone

on wed 4 jul 2007 103825 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on tue 3 jul 2007 210747 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on tue 3 jul 2007 080638 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 202653 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe you havent done very good with that either. i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. uh......maybe someone needs to let you know that this is 2007. the 70s are like 30+ years ago. technology and knowledge change snotard. at least for most of us that dont chose to live in the 70s. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. not trying to cause trouble here but you really are starting to make yourself look foolish. he never said anything about the coefficient of friction or even that the studded tires had the same wet grip as standard ones. his exact words were number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads to me and i would think to just about anyone else would see this as him saying a good balance as meaning that even though there is a traction loss with studded tires this configuration minimizes the loss of traction on wet roads for gains they provide on ice. you need to read the whole thread before you jump in and try to be the referee tom. here is what he said...... i did read the entire thread and simply didnt say anything it the first post. studed tires are good on ice. but absolutly suck on wet pavement. talk about swapping ends. never even remotely have had that problem on wet roads and i have been using them for many years. sounds like his experience and just because you probably didnt have the same doesnt make his a lie or wrong. now i have seen some studded tires that are studded all the way across the tread and i could see where those could be maybe dicey on wet roads. i use ones that have two staggered rows on each outer edge part of tires and with none in center. now here he explains how the ones he uses are not fully studded and have better traction than the ones that are and that makes perfect sense to me. rubber is a flexible product and the studs on the outside of the tread are going to have little effect on the tread in the center and unless you have some data to say that this isnt true then like i said you are making a fool out of yourself. ----------------- thesnoman.com now........talk about making yourself look foolish tom. that happens when you set yourself up to be the judge. dont do that. im simply pointing out facts and dont have the bias of hatred against snowball that you and others seem to have. what you have is the anti hero mentality tom where you just love to be the lone voice against the pack. that is just as much of a bias as anything that you claim to address. more so perhaps. lol where do you get this stuff from from you he didnt say that his studded tires were as good as conventional on wet roads only that his were not fully studded and that he never had any problems with them. sounds ok to me and definitely didnt warrant the outburst that you gave him which is why i said what i said. im not about to start an argument or even a long winded discussion over it. i simply gave an unbiased opinion on it and do with it what you will even if it means ignoring it. oh come on tom why would i ignore what you have to say i mean it added so much to the whole co

From : ed h

on mon 02 jul 2007 202653 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe you havent done very good with that either. i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. uh......maybe someone needs to let you know that this is 2007. the 70s are like 30+ years ago. technology and knowledge change snotard. at least for most of us that dont chose to live in the 70s. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. not trying to cause trouble here but you really are starting to make yourself look foolish. he never said anything about the coefficient of friction or even that the studded tires had the same wet grip as standard ones. his exact words were number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads to me and i would think to just about anyone else would see this as him saying a good balance as meaning that even though there is a traction loss with studded tires this configuration minimizes the loss of traction on wet roads for gains they provide on ice. well ive used them for a season some years ago. yes they were staggered. yes they were good on ice and hardpacked snow. yes they sucked on wet paved and concrete roads. they sucked so badly that i think some states have banned them in any weather. are these fully studded or just on the outside edges of the tread not doubting you just getting information since it has been a long time since i put any type of snow tire on my vehicles. the bottom line with snow tires is this imo. ya gotta have a dedicated snow tire. further altough the idiot says he tried blizzaks he maintains studed tires are better. i would simply take that as a personal opinion and may have as much to do with his driving style as anything else. he is i believe again wrong. i believe that if you look on the side of a blizak you will see a snowflake stamped into the sidewall. that signifiys that you dont have to chain up in most mountains areas. i doubt you are afforded that with a studed tire. ill take your word for it and since i dont plan on driving down any mountain roads in the winter.... -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .