truck-trans-dodge
truck-logo-dodge
Search Messages :  

99 Dakota V8, heat output decreases with low vacuum, where to look?

From : jethro bodine

Q: thanks guys ill simply hopefully its simple remove the bumper hammer away at the dent and if it looks nice ill live with it. if not ill get the new bumper and at least ill have experience on removing the old bumper and placing the new one. again thanks for the help. i have removed the front bumper on my 2000 and then on my 2001 ram 1500. no big deal. there is nothing on it regarding the air bag. you have to take out a few screws and release a few clips on the plastic facia. other than that just a few big bolts and it comes loose. i did not completely remove mine. i swung it down in order to get easy access to mount and wire in fog lights. but i could have just as easily removed it completely. gerald levin wrote come on guys. need some help. im looking to remove my front bumper hammer out a few dents and reinstall. new bumper with shipping is $150-200. is the bumper easy to remove as i dont need it to look perfect just better. also do i have to disconnect the battery to prevent the airbag from engaging help! really appreciate anyones help on this. thanks gerald ps truck is nice about a 90 pointer but not a show truck just want to improve the appearance if i can reasonably remove improve and reinstall the bumper. .

Replies:

From : nitpik

plonk the same thing that motivates right-wing overly-conservative war-mongering republicans a narrow and closed mind. craig c. war-mongering i take offense to that! i run a peace loving business selling t-bone steaks. did you ever consider who hates war the most think about it and ill then discuss part two with you. john z kerry president t-bone steak houses .

From : maxpower

turn-key business opportunity with unlimited income potential! want to make some serious money sick of the 9-5 routine im looking for hardworking smart self-motivating and dedicated individuals to take part in a turn-key business opportunity that can literally make you thousands a month. this is a no risk leveraged income opportunity can easily make $500-$1000 working part time. flexible hours part time or full time. experience some marketing experience preferred but not necessary. we will start and teach individuals willing to learn. cost you get started for free we even provide you with your very own website. read more give it a try and get started today! there is zero risk and infinite income potential. http//delhelt.surplusalert.com/makemoney p.s this is a real business opportunity where you make real money doing real work.this is not an m-l-m or get quick rich scheme....dont click on the link if you are looking for a mlm. p.s.s only serious inquires please. http//delhelt.surplusalert.com/makemoney click here to sign up. email me at delhelt@surplusalert.com if you have any questions before sign up and for more details! .

From : steve lusardi

on fri 15 oct 2004 232716 gmt tom lawrence tnloaswpraemnmcien5g@earthlink.net wrote just another reason i like diesels better... you left out just another reason i like non-electronic diesels better... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ .

From : jethro bodine

plonk for being a loser -- http//www.dollarrandomizer.com/punch few americans would have voted for george w. bush four years ago if he had promised that as president he would . empty the social security trust fund by $507 billion to help offset fiscal irresponsibility and at the same time slash social security benefits. . cut medicare by 17 percent and reduce veterans benefits and military pay. . eliminate overtime pay for millions of americans and raise oil prices by 50 percent. . give tax cuts to businesses that sent american jobs overseas and in fact by policy encourage their departure. . give away billions of tax dollars in government contracts without competitive bids. . involve this country in a deadly and highly questionable war and . take a budget surplus and turn it into the worst deficit in the history of the united states creating a debt in just four years that will take generations to repay. these were elements of a hidden agenda that surfaced only after he took office. the publishers of the iconoclast endorsed bush four years ago based on the things he promised not on this smoke-screened agenda. today we are endorsing his opponent john kerry based not only on the things that bush has delivered but also on the vision of a return to normality that kerry says our country needs. four items trouble us the most about the bush administration his initiatives to disable the social security system the deteriorating state of the american economy a dangerous shift away from the basic freedoms established by our founding fathers and his continuous mistakes regarding terrorism and iraq. president bush has announced plans to change the social security system as we know it by privatizing it which when considering all the tangents related to such a change would put the entire economy in a dramatic tailspin. the social security trust fund actually lends money to the rest of the government in exchange for government bonds which is how the system must work by law but how do you later repay social security while you are running a huge deficit its impossible without raising taxes sometime in the future or becoming fiscally responsible now. social security money is being used to escalate our deficit and at the same time mask a much larger government deficit instead of paying down the national debt which would be a proper use to guarantee a future gain. privatization is problematic in that it would subject social security to the ups downs and outright crashes of the stock market. it would take millions in brokerage fees and commissions out of the system and unless we have assurance that the ivan boeskys and ken lays of the world will be caught and punished as a deterrent subject both the market and the social security fund to fraud and market manipulation not to mention devastate and ruin multitudes of american families that would find their lives lost to starvation shame and isolation. kerry wants to keep social security which each of us already owns. he says that the program is manageable since it is projected to be solvent through 2042 with use of its trust funds. this would give ample time to strengthen the economy reduce the budget deficit the bush administration has created and therefore bolster the program as needed to fit ever-changing demographics. our senior citizens depend upon social security. bushs answer is radical and uncalled for and would result in chaos as americans have never experienced. do we really want to risk the future of social security on bush by spinning the wheel of uncertainty in those dark hours after the world trade center attacks americans rallied together with a new sense of patriotism. we were ready to follow bushs lead through any travail. he let us down. when he finally emerged from his hide-outs on remote military bases well after the first crucial hours following the attack he gave sound-bytes instead of solutions. he did not trust us to be ready to sacrifice build up our public and private security infrastructure or cut down on our energy use to put economic pressure on the enemy in all the nations where he hides. he merely told us to shop spend and pretend nothing was wrong. rather than using the billions of dollars expended on the invasion of iraq to shore up our boundaries and go after osama bin laden and the saudi arabian terrorists the funds were used to initiate a war with what bush called a more immediate menace saddam hussein in oil-rich iraq. after all bush said iraq had weapons of mass destruction trained on america. we believed him just as we believed it when he reported that iraq was the heart of terrorism. we trusted him. the iconoclast the presidents hometown paper took bush on his word and editorialized in favor of the invasion. the papers publisher promoted bush and the invasion of iraq to londoners in a bbc interview during the time that the administration was wooing t