94 Ram replacement of rear brake tubing.

From : don

Q: -- remove shorts to reply nope you said a cat; kinda ambiguous since a 3406 would be a tight squeeze in a pickup. so would a c series cummins but thats been done. if i happen to prefer an inefficient 635 c.i. v8 with 400+ hp and physical dimensions favorable to swapping thats just me. i routinely swap out efficient slant sixes in favor of gas guzzling inefficient 440s. which makes sense in the gasoline burning world. it lacks sense in the diesel world. so says you. according to your logic a 4-cylinder perkins could pull a class 8 truck over the rockies so thats the way to go. .

Replies:

From : paul100

hmmpf!!! i challenge them to get it to run smoother than a well tuned slant six. -- budd on tue 12 oct 2004 geoff wrote looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current dodge durango. taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went on the chevrolet equinox until someone at chevrolet said clear taillights! no! dude! we totally have to do clear taillights! the wrap-around taillights suck i agree. and theyre all red. no amber turn blinker. suddenly its 1991... boo! on the v6 replacing the i6; suv engines ought to have low-end grunt. that i6 was an institution and it deserved to be updated rather than discarded. agreed. im sure car and driver will cream their jeans about the silky-smooth v6 being better than the agricultural-sounding pushrod inline 6 it replaces. .