truck-trans-dodge
truck-logo-dodge
Search Messages :  

2500 fuel guage

From : destin rogers

Q: on thu 22 dec 2005 073428 -0800 theguy theguy@notebook.com wrote on 22 dec 2005 064356 -0800 budd cochran mr-d150@preciscom.net wrote jerry wrote budd cochran wrote i can not find any evidence of a scientist secular or creationist that has ever found a positive mutation. if avian influenza ever mutates from chickens to humans you will....... only if they can prove conclsively that the virus significantly changed into another viable form...iow a new strain with large changes not normal to the genome and not merely an adaption to environment. the key word for both of us is the biggest two letter word in the english language if. thats where creationists and evolutionists really differ evolutionists grasp at every little adaption in hopes of discovering conclusive proof of evolution the missing link while creationists only want what darwin claimed a major change in the genetic code . . .a dog whelping a pup that has primate like attributes an opposable thumb for example to prove evolution until then creation is more logical. i was at yahoo.com a while ago and saw in the oddities a story about a rainbow trout caught in nebraska with two mouths one functional and one not funtional. its a classic example of negative mutation because the lower mouth just sits there. budd budd really you gotta slow down of the coffee. do you ever sleep oh forgot thank you for the christmas blessing and my best to you and all your family. merry christmas and a happy and healthy new year. .

Replies:

From : carolina watercraft works

theguy wrote on 22 dec 2005 064356 -0800 budd cochran mr-d150@preciscom.net wrote jerry wrote budd cochran wrote i can not find any evidence of a scientist secular or creationist that has ever found a positive mutation. if avian influenza ever mutates from chickens to humans you will....... only if they can prove conclsively that the virus significantly changed into another viable form...iow a new strain with large changes not normal to the genome and not merely an adaption to environment. the key word for both of us is the biggest two letter word in the english language if. thats where creationists and evolutionists really differ evolutionists grasp at every little adaption in hopes of discovering conclusive proof of evolution the missing link while creationists only want what darwin claimed a major change in the genetic code . . .a dog whelping a pup that has primate like attributes an opposable thumb for example to prove evolution until then creation is more logical. i was at yahoo.com a while ago and saw in the oddities a story about a rainbow trout caught in nebraska with two mouths one functional and one not funtional. its a classic example of negative mutation because the lower mouth just sits there. budd budd really you gotta slow down of the coffee. do you ever sleep yeah sure uh . . . .whats sleep hey hon fix me another pot of coffee my day runs from 4-5 am to about 10-12 at night. ive never slept a lot even as a kid. the trout story had a picture with it and it was the ugliest bow id ever seen . . .made me think of bill clinton flashy fishy and double talking. http//.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051221/aponfest/mutatedfish;ylt=aif3q3vgosj62kes4mmjjxztibif;ylu=x3odmta5ahjvmddwbhnlywn5bmnhda-- shows what happens when you freeze yer butt off ice fishing. vbg budd .