2003 RAM 2500 Diesel towing do's and don'ts

From : Annonymous

Q: on fri 29 jun 2007 103329 -0500 craig c. mcraigchr@gmail.com wrote warming up sufficiently lol at 600am is my consolation prize....wish it was noiser. wait until it gets colder outside. you can wake the dead and shitty neighbors. ive done it many times myself. i was sitting in the drive though bank line with my windows down enjoying some fresh breezes and jazz on the radio. one of those boom boxes on wheels pulls right next to me in another line. the guy looks at me and smirks obviously enjoying his windows down experience also and not caring that his sub woofer is rattling every ones car around him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. bb .

Replies:

From : miles

is their a way to enable the high idle through the cruse controls on a 07 5.9 ctd 6 speed .

From : max dodge

chris thompson wrote man they just dont build them like they used to do they i mean shoot only 7 years out of this one case the power supply for my amd 1100 went south need i say it buy a mac ... you wont have these problems. - macs are now offically pcs with another os on it. craig c. .

From : max dodge

mac davis wrote well the max speed limit in baja is 50 mph / 80 kpm but nobody pays much attention to it.. lol 80 kpm = 2982.582 mph... fast enough to make the paint peel or burn off! ;^ bryan .

From : miles

jeb wrote the new camry hybrid battery is such that you can replace individual cells so expense for replacement is less. a battery is no stronger than its weakest cell. replacing one cell at a time as it wears out is pointless. .

From : roy

roy wrote i take it he is saying he would not put a trucking operation a commerical business in a area zoned single family residential. thats true. but i do not think its right to allow a mega-huge elaborate 10000sf house in the middle of small 1200sf homes or vis-versa. i feel a neighborhood should have some uniformity to it. a free for all is not desirable. .

From : max dodge

transit all electric vehicles hybrids. you make very valid points with the cars ive owned in the past i did more than my share of dirtying things up. hell on a couple of them i had to pay the friggin gas guzzler tax. craig c. . 222 337236 4692b2a9$0$30621$4c368faf@roadrunner.com on jul 9 429 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote roy wrote ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. the cost savings just isnt there. a honda civic dx is $16000 and gets 30mpg city. a honda civic hybrid is $23000 and gets 50mpg city. lets say someone drives well over the national average at 20000 miles per year. 20000/30 * $3/gallon = $2000 20000/50 * $3/gallon = $1200 a savings of $800/year. it would take 8.75 years to make up for the higher price of the hybrid. thats not even counting the difference in tax on the two cars which where i live would be $7000 * 8% sales tax = $560 more. furthermore most people dont drive 20000 miles a year i do so it would be even worse for many. you may very well be correct. i guess it is how you look at it and what you are comfortable with. ill be moving from a car that gets 17-19 on the highway and around 15 in the city. also it requires premium fuel. so until the dust settles from the move and i know exactly where we are at it looks pretty good.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - roy though i think that hybrids are a great idea miles does have a point. my wife is thinking about a toyota highlander hybrid but i have gotten her to look at the yaris also. they have a little 4 door sedan that is actually pretty nice looking rather roomy and peppy too. as i recall it gets about 45 - 50 mpg and was only like 14k fully loaded. i looked at them. im leaning toward toyota camry cause they have been doing it for quite some time. they usually put out a very good product they are a fairly decent size and they do real well if you have the misfortune to get involved in a accident. .

From : miles

max dodge wrote you obviously dont read what i write. in my example i specifically stated that if both of the neighbors agree on the 7 fence i also asked if you should be able to do as you please regardless of whether the neighbors like it or not and you said yep its your property. .

From : miles

on sun 8 jul 2007 115856 -0700 bryan bryan.swadenernospam@comcast.net wrote mac davis wrote well the max speed limit in baja is 50 mph / 80 kpm but nobody pays much attention to it.. lol 80 kpm = 2982.582 mph... fast enough to make the paint peel or burn off! ;^ bryan oops... kph damn metric system is only good for wrench sizes.. lol mac please remove splinters before emailing .

From : miles

thanks! that was it! the end that attaches toe the axle is just a friction fit or should a clamp be used access to my service manual. the truck appears to run just fine. any ideas so wait - both ends are loose like bir said it sounds like its the rear axle breather hose. look on top of the rear axle drivers side. youll see a brake distribution block two hard lines running out to each wheel one flex line running up the the left-side frame rail. there should be a hose barb sticking up from this block and thats where the hose connects to. the other end with the white plastic piece in it thats the breather - its got tiny holes to allow air to pass but keeps any water spray out should have a metal clip on it and it clips up to the spare tire carrier frame. if the clip is gone just use a zip tie to secure it and use a small hose clamp to clamp the hose to the hose barb on the axle tube. be sure to leave a little slack in the hose so that the suspension can droop without straining the hose. .

From : miles

max dodge wrote which if you had read what i wrote to begin with you would already know. no max you contradict yourself often. i specifically asked if people should be able to do anything they want if its not a hazard and you have repeatedly said yes. now you say there should be codes but only used as guidelines and not enforced. if they are not enforced then they are useless to even have. .

From : max dodge

on jul 8 239 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote roy wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia toyota has the best reviews but honda is cheaper and good quality. but i really do not see the purpose of the hybrids. they command a hefty premium in price that will never be recouped from gas savings. and resale will be absolutely horrid when they reach the end of the typical battery life. based upon the current state of the art i would avoid hybrids like the plague... toyota will soon find that paybacks are hell.... jmho seems like they are like a bic lighter. after the 100000 miles or 8 year battery warranty runs out ya throw them away. that would be an awful expensive bic. that is purdy much what ive gathered too. when its time to replace the batteries youre gonna cry. im not sold on the hybrids quite yet but give them a few more years and they may be ok. ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. for me it would be a saving just to use regular gas. took a toyota camry hybrid for a spin yesterday.it accelerated and changed lanes on the highway like the wifes magnum v6. i was impressed with it. roy denny- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - so does that mean we can start calling you a wabbit loving tree hugger!! bg no you can call me a guy that is having a hard time justifying a 425+ hp car to drive a couple of miles to the beach. i bought charger with the thought that id be making the trip from fl to ma a few times a year for a number of years. now with the wife deciding to move totally to fl that wont be happening. also i like toys. if it isnt going to be driven a bunch the charger ceases to be a toy. so a transportation type car is in order. as far as loving a rabbit and hugging a tree goes well. the rabbit is something only a mother could love. i figure his wife is a frustrated social worker. bfg come on now roy...gimme a big ole hug......... gbmfg denny i couldnt get my arms around ya! vbg i cant help youre only 4 1 tall...... denny .

From : max dodge

what if your neighbor came to you and asked and you said what he wanted would look like hell next to your property...and he did it anyways 1 its unlikely id have an opinion since im not anal retentive about what someone else is doing on their property. 2 id probably put up a fence that looked better on my side of his fence. 3 as stated way back at the beginning the property codes should be guidelines to settle a dispute should one arise. too often the government sees them as a way to interfere with property rights of the individual. i am 35 miles from central phoenix on the far northern outskirts. my neighborhood is bordered on two sides by open desert. i do agree that in areas where houses are just scattered far apart among open countryside there should be far less restrictions. thats why others have said that if you wanna do as you please then move to an area where that doesnt bother anyone. so you are in a suburban location. thanks for confirming that. nearest big city is over 120 miles away from me. we country folk have a different way of looking at things from you city folk. we prefer to talk to the neighbor rather than respect him with laws. as such our codes enforcer isnt the best liked fellow in town..... nor is our borough council. if my neighbor decided to put up a 7 fence on our mutual property line tomorrow id look at it as a huge savings of cash. let me give you an example of the idiotic codes.... we can have a 5 solid fence. we can have a 6 fence but the top foot has to be 50% see through. even though fencing is sold in solid 6 high sections...... we cannot trim trees without a permit regardless of the threat they may pose to homes. if we trim them we cannot keep the trimmings on the property. nor can we keep grass clippings of any amount. but we have to keep the grass lower than 10. note we must trim the grass but we cannot keep the trimmings. catch22 maybe driveways must be paved... but id bet 75% are not. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : max dodge

on jul 8 900 pm brian worldindustr...@shaw.ca wrote azwiley1 wrote on jul 8 806 pm brian worldindustr...@shaw.ca wrote i know this is a dodge site and i drive a dodge ram 3500 myself my friend has a 2000 gmc sierra 1500. the exhaust is out problem he has headers and magnaflow exhaust. the y pipe and the cats are our problem. their are o2 sensors before and after the cats. i was wondering if we could cut the cats out and weld in pipe the same diameter of the rest of the exhaust and not have problems with trouble codes and such or do we need to get high flow cats being that it is a 2000 i would leave them alone unless there is a problem with them you will not gain enough to justify the costs and headaches. if you cut them out and straight pipe it you will have issues. i have a 99 silverado same thing basically and in 00 they changed the cat set up slightly. if you replace them with anything other than oe you will continuously have a ses light on. if you pop intowww.fullsizechevy.comyou can get more detailed info on it. it has to do with the flow of the oe vice the aftermarket cats. the cats are a problem but thanks for that web site its just like dtr i set him up on that - hide quoted text - - show quoted text - by problem i meant i am sure you know that they are clogged burn out etc... i would suggest he talk with local shops other than dealerships or midas as they will be able to tell him some more too. fyi i learned of this issue from magnaflow tech as they were kind enough to inform me of it. .

From : denny

i know this is a dodge site and i drive a dodge ram 3500 myself my friend has a 2000 gmc sierra 1500. the exhaust is out problem he has headers and magnaflow exhaust. the y pipe and the cats are our problem. their are o2 sensors before and after the cats. i was wondering if we could cut the cats out and weld in pipe the same diameter of the rest of the exhaust and not have problems with trouble codes and such or do we need to get high flow cats .

From : miles

on jul 8 239 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote roy wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia toyota has the best reviews but honda is cheaper and good quality. but i really do not see the purpose of the hybrids. they command a hefty premium in price that will never be recouped from gas savings. and resale will be absolutely horrid when they reach the end of the typical battery life. based upon the current state of the art i would avoid hybrids like the plague... toyota will soon find that paybacks are hell.... jmho seems like they are like a bic lighter. after the 100000 miles or 8 year battery warranty runs out ya throw them away. that would be an awful expensive bic. that is purdy much what ive gathered too. when its time to replace the batteries youre gonna cry. im not sold on the hybrids quite yet but give them a few more years and they may be ok. ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. for me it would be a saving just to use regular gas. took a toyota camry hybrid for a spin yesterday.it accelerated and changed lanes on the highway like the wifes magnum v6. i was impressed with it. roy denny- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - so does that mean we can start calling you a wabbit loving tree hugger!! bg no you can call me a guy that is having a hard time justifying a 425+ hp car to drive a couple of miles to the beach. i bought charger with the thought that id be making the trip from fl to ma a few times a year for a number of years. now with the wife deciding to move totally to fl that wont be happening. also i like toys. if it isnt going to be driven a bunch the charger ceases to be a toy. so a transportation type car is in order. as far as loving a rabbit and hugging a tree goes well. the rabbit is something only a mother could love. i figure his wife is a frustrated social worker. bfg come on now roy...gimme a big ole hug......... gbmfg denny i couldnt get my arms around ya! vbg roy .

From : miles

on jul 8 1248 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote i hate to say it again but in case you two miles and max havent figured it out you are both pissing in the wind and getting wet! wtf are you two arguing about seriously come on how does a law in az about how a walmart looks have fuck all to do with pa likewise how the fuck does a law in pa have fuck all to do with how a walmart in az looks. simple answer nothing!!! once again you are both arguing over shit that is one way in one state and trying to say that it is wrong some where else. my god! larry the moderator!!!! gbmfg!!! sorry pal i had to do it!! piss off man dont you have a pink wabbit to tourment bg i do have a rather wide assed rabbit that i have been associated with. of course he aint so pink anymore. he has been out practicing his shooting and is smudged with gunpowder. actually i think ol wide ride took his family on vacation for a bit. i know he plans on taking them to a wc his idea of a day at the beach.g. his wife demanded more than that so they are on the move. oooops! sorry bad info wide ride is still with us for little while. i think i figured out where hes spending his vacation. probably at the idiots house. its only down the road from him so there will be no wc withdrawal. his wife can drop him off and continue on and really enjoy herself while the rabbit and the idiot bond. hell maybe the crotch cannibal will stop in and provide some entertainment. talk about one helluva imagination.... were going west not south. on second thought maybe i will stop in to see the idiot. tell him how much he means to you. maybe even send him your way for a nice stroll on the beach. i bet you two would look cute walking in the sand as the sunsets....the surf tickling your toes as you bond.......togethernessss........sharing wisdom......... denny .

From : max dodge

roy wrote ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. the cost savings just isnt there. a honda civic dx is $16000 and gets 30mpg city. a honda civic hybrid is $23000 and gets 50mpg city. lets say someone drives well over the national average at 20000 miles per year. 20000/30 * $3/gallon = $2000 20000/50 * $3/gallon = $1200 a savings of $800/year. it would take 8.75 years to make up for the higher price of the hybrid. thats not even counting the difference in tax on the two cars which where i live would be $7000 * 8% sales tax = $560 more. furthermore most people dont drive 20000 miles a year i do so it would be even worse for many. not to think of the couple of grand for new batteries if you keep it that long.... denny .

From : max dodge

on jul 8 239 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote roy wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia toyota has the best reviews but honda is cheaper and good quality. but i really do not see the purpose of the hybrids. they command a hefty premium in price that will never be recouped from gas savings. and resale will be absolutely horrid when they reach the end of the typical battery life. based upon the current state of the art i would avoid hybrids like the plague... toyota will soon find that paybacks are hell.... jmho seems like they are like a bic lighter. after the 100000 miles or 8 year battery warranty runs out ya throw them away. that would be an awful expensive bic. that is purdy much what ive gathered too. when its time to replace the batteries youre gonna cry. im not sold on the hybrids quite yet but give them a few more years and they may be ok. ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. for me it would be a saving just to use regular gas. took a toyota camry hybrid for a spin yesterday.it accelerated and changed lanes on the highway like the wifes magnum v6. i was impressed with it. roy denny- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - so does that mean we can start calling you a wabbit loving tree hugger!! bg no you can call me a guy that is having a hard time justifying a 425+ hp car to drive a couple of miles to the beach. i bought charger with the thought that id be making the trip from fl to ma a few times a year for a number of years. now with the wife deciding to move totally to fl that wont be happening. also i like toys. if it isnt going to be driven a bunch the charger ceases to be a toy. so a transportation type car is in order. as far as loving a rabbit and hugging a tree goes well. the rabbit is something only a mother could love. i figure his wife is a frustrated social worker. bfg come on now roy...gimme a big ole hug......... gbmfg denny .

From : miles

roy wrote ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. the cost savings just isnt there. a honda civic dx is $16000 and gets 30mpg city. a honda civic hybrid is $23000 and gets 50mpg city. lets say someone drives well over the national average at 20000 miles per year. 20000/30 * $3/gallon = $2000 20000/50 * $3/gallon = $1200 a savings of $800/year. it would take 8.75 years to make up for the higher price of the hybrid. thats not even counting the difference in tax on the two cars which where i live would be $7000 * 8% sales tax = $560 more. furthermore most people dont drive 20000 miles a year i do so it would be even worse for many. .

From : max dodge

thats true but my issue with max is from his arrogance and complete lack of respect for neighbors. you obviously dont read what i write. in my example i specifically stated that if both of the neighbors agree on the 7 fence why does the government need to restrict the fence to 5 in this case the neighbors respect each other but hte government doesnt respect the individual. much of the quality of a neighborhood is in its people. when they respect each other and dont just do as they please with disregard its usually a much nicer place to live...at least to me. respect also means no whining when things arent exactly to your cultured taste. i realize the laws of one state are not the same as in another but max praises arrogance and disrespect of neighbors! thats my issue. once again youve failed to read but thats nothing new. max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author azwiley1 wrote wtf are you two arguing about seriously come on how does a law in az about how a walmart looks have fuck all to do with pa thats true but my issue with max is from his arrogance and complete lack of respect for neighbors. much of the quality of a neighborhood is in its people. when they respect each other and dont just do as they please with disregard its usually a much nicer place to live...at least to me. i realize the laws of one state are not the same as in another but max praises arrogance and disrespect of neighbors! thats my issue. .

From : Annonymous

roy wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia toyota has the best reviews but honda is cheaper and good quality. but i really do not see the purpose of the hybrids. they command a hefty premium in price that will never be recouped from gas savings. and resale will be absolutely horrid when they reach the end of the typical battery life. based upon the current state of the art i would avoid hybrids like the plague... toyota will soon find that paybacks are hell.... jmho seems like they are like a bic lighter. after the 100000 miles or 8 year battery warranty runs out ya throw them away. that would be an awful expensive bic. that is purdy much what ive gathered too. when its time to replace the batteries youre gonna cry. im not sold on the hybrids quite yet but give them a few more years and they may be ok. ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. for me it would be a saving just to use regular gas. took a toyota camry hybrid for a spin yesterday.it accelerated and changed lanes on the highway like the wifes magnum v6. i was impressed with it. roy denny .

From : miles

such an attitude! do what you want f the neighbors and anyone can move if they dont like it. pretty much. the way i see it if someone doesnt like what i do with my property and its not a hazard to their safety and wellbeing its none of their damn business. liekwise if i dont like what the neighbors do with their property so long as its not a hazard to me or my well being its none of my damn business. great harmony your neighborhood must have. sorry max i prefer a neighborhood where neighbors actually know each other are friends and get along which means respecting each other. same here. which means of all things ya dont complain about something if the only reason is you dont like it. respect the fact that the neighbor owns his lot and can do as he sees fit. you have pretty well told me you have no respect for others in your area. false. you have assumed that my attitude isnt a two way street. furthermore i gave an example where talking to the neighbor is part of the deal. sadly your vast intellect was thrown aside when it came to addressign the issue and you preferred to complain about my attitude. id still like to know why a 7 fence that the neighbors on both sides approve of is a problem to anyone else especially the government. but im sure people such as yourself have reasons if only to say we dont like it. f em if they dont like anything you do. you fail to realize one big part of what makes a neighborhood...people max not just buildings. yup which is why i advocate leaving the government and its intrusive property codes out of it until the neighbors need a guideline to solve a disagreement. no max its about respecting your neighbors instead of your ill do anything i want and f anyone who is bothered by it.. some of that i agree with but there must be limitations. otherwise a neighborhood goes right down the gutter...and yes i have seen many do so because of the attitude you pride yourself on. lemme guess you live in an urban or suburban development. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : miles

nathan w. collier no@way.spam.com wrote in just got off the phone with the dealership. they told me there is a blend door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - in that case its probably the accuator that controls the door. there are actually 4 different doors. in that case - the entire dash has to come out to access the doors or accuators. book list time to do this at 10 hours. good thing your under warranty - it cost me 1600 bucks when one of my accuators went south after 38 months - 2 months off warranty. .

From : azwiley1

max dodge wrote feel free to move. if its not against the building code to go more than one story who cares wow they look like small hotels... whats next small casinos such an attitude! do what you want f the neighbors and anyone can move if they dont like it. great harmony your neighborhood must have. sorry max i prefer a neighborhood where neighbors actually know each other are friends and get along which means respecting each other. you have pretty well told me you have no respect for others in your area. f em if they dont like anything you do. you fail to realize one big part of what makes a neighborhood...people max not just buildings. the mentality you display is one of i dont like what that guy did so ill petition to make a law against it. no max its about respecting your neighbors instead of your ill do anything i want and f anyone who is bothered by it.. some of that i agree with but there must be limitations. otherwise a neighborhood goes right down the gutter...and yes i have seen many do so because of the attitude you pride yourself on. .

From : roy

on sun 08 jul 2007 184325 gmt max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote im not referring to the all look alike tract housing. i grew up in an area where single story ranch style homes were the norm. some people lately have wanted to bull doze their home and put up a mega huge multi-story home. some nearby neighborhoods have such houses and they basically look like small hotels! they were stopped because they disrupt the uniformity of the neighborhood and make it look like something much different than why people bought there in the first place. feel free to move. if its not against the building code to go more than one story who cares wow they look like small hotels... whats next small casinos thats not true at all. a massive house in the middle of simple small homes is not always an improvement. its a distraction and an eyesore in many areas. it looks out of place. yeah thats horrible...... see in the neighborhood where my place is in maryland people buy the small house and they put up a second floor or add on in some way. and yeah its a change to the neighborhood and it looks out of place but its their land. so i dont have a problem with it. besides its probably pulling my property value up. thats a double edged sword since the taxes are reassessed every three years. so ill be selling puttting together a good retirement and maybe buying some toys. and whoever buys my place will probably add on to it. oh well.... itll be theirs at that point. the mentality you display is one of i dont like what that guy did so ill petition to make a law against it. maybe we should simply outlaw assholes who figure they can control more than they own. im with max on this whole thing. while i understand the need to try to set some sort of standards in an area people always end up going too far. i live in a pud with cc and rs. the home owners association runs the deal but have the legal authority to fine you if you dont comply and place a lien if you dont pay your fine. that was ok when they had people with half a brain but the new group are idiots. i got a warning notice from them a couple of weeks ago because i left my garbage can out at the curb for pickup for 30 hours rather than the allowed 24 hours. i was out of town. next time i do such a horrible thing they said they would have to fine me. i sent the notice back to them and told them where they could put it. if you build an outbuilding or a fence even to code but dont get it approved in advance by their building committee you will get a fine until you remove it. some guy down the street painted his house a color they didnt like so they passed around a petition to add house color to their things that they need to approve. the petition didnt pass and they couldnt understand why. people simply go too far. in the final analysis id rather have no codes than have to deal with the rules that fucksticks set up. just my 2 cents worth a pud is a whole other deal than zoning. actually a pud is part of ma zoning. i rather have the zoning to keep the fucksticks in line. .

From : miles

on jul 8 219 pm the...@whatever.net wrote on sun 08 jul 2007 184325 gmt max dodge max...@verizon.net wrote im not referring to the all look alike tract housing. i grew up in an area where single story ranch style homes were the norm. some people lately have wanted to bull doze their home and put up a mega huge multi-story home. some nearby neighborhoods have such houses and they basically look like small hotels! they were stopped because they disrupt the uniformity of the neighborhood and make it look like something much different than why people bought there in the first place. feel free to move. if its not against the building code to go more than one story who cares wow they look like small hotels... whats next small casinos thats not true at all. a massive house in the middle of simple small homes is not always an improvement. its a distraction and an eyesore in many areas. it looks out of place. yeah thats horrible...... see in the neighborhood where my place is in maryland people buy the small house and they put up a second floor or add on in some way. and yeah its a change to the neighborhood and it looks out of place but its their land. so i dont have a problem with it. besides its probably pulling my property value up. thats a double edged sword since the taxes are reassessed every three years. so ill be selling puttting together a good retirement and maybe buying some toys. and whoever buys my place will probably add on to it. oh well.... itll be theirs at that point. the mentality you display is one of i dont like what that guy did so ill petition to make a law against it. maybe we should simply outlaw assholes who figure they can control more than they own. im with max on this whole thing. while i understand the need to try to set some sort of standards in an area people always end up going too far. i live in a pud with cc and rs. the home owners association runs the deal but have the legal authority to fine you if you dont comply and place a lien if you dont pay your fine. that was ok when they had people with half a brain but the new group are idiots. i got a warning notice from them a couple of weeks ago because i left my garbage can out at the curb for pickup for 30 hours rather than the allowed 24 hours. i was out of town. next time i do such a horrible thing they said they would have to fine me. i sent the notice back to them and told them where they could put it. if you build an outbuilding or a fence even to code but dont get it approved in advance by their building committee you will get a fine until you remove it. some guy down the street painted his house a color they didnt like so they passed around a petition to add house color to their things that they need to approve. the petition didnt pass and they couldnt understand why. people simply go too far. in the final analysis id rather have no codes than have to deal with the rules that fucksticks set up. just my 2 cents worth - hide quoted text - - show quoted text - i agree with you i have seen hoas like that but there are also some i have seen that are the complete opposite allowing anything anywhere. i have lived in a getto ass trailer park when i was younger and hated it because there was not rule or order. i grew up as a kid in a great neighorhood that is nothing more than a drug dealing getto now full of true niggers you now the dealing shoorting kind and my parents hate it. i now live in an area that has an hoa and cc&r but they are logical ones sort of like rancho sauhrita miles i think it really boils down to good ole common sense sure be yourself have things how you would like but dont be so damn tacky about it that it is a constant eye sore to everyone else that lives there. if you want a 10 block wall a 50k square foot house and a 10k square foot garage move to a location that would allow for those things not a developed community and do it just to be an asshole. fyi my point earlier was the fact that max and miles are arguing different state codes/laws and trying to make them appicable to another state sorry doesnt work like that. .

From : roy

on jul 8 239 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote roy wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia toyota has the best reviews but honda is cheaper and good quality. but i really do not see the purpose of the hybrids. they command a hefty premium in price that will never be recouped from gas savings. and resale will be absolutely horrid when they reach the end of the typical battery life. based upon the current state of the art i would avoid hybrids like the plague... toyota will soon find that paybacks are hell.... jmho seems like they are like a bic lighter. after the 100000 miles or 8 year battery warranty runs out ya throw them away. that would be an awful expensive bic. that is purdy much what ive gathered too. when its time to replace the batteries youre gonna cry. im not sold on the hybrids quite yet but give them a few more years and they may be ok. ive been doing a bunch of reading on them. seems that the deal on the batteries isnt what it use to be. under 2k for a replacement. toyota warranty is for 100k or 8 years. 40mpg is nothing to sneeze at. for me it would be a saving just to use regular gas. took a toyota camry hybrid for a spin yesterday.it accelerated and changed lanes on the highway like the wifes magnum v6. i was impressed with it. roy denny- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - so does that mean we can start calling you a wabbit loving tree hugger!! bg .

From : roy

on sun 08 jul 2007 184325 gmt max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote im not referring to the all look alike tract housing. i grew up in an area where single story ranch style homes were the norm. some people lately have wanted to bull doze their home and put up a mega huge multi-story home. some nearby neighborhoods have such houses and they basically look like small hotels! they were stopped because they disrupt the uniformity of the neighborhood and make it look like something much different than why people bought there in the first place. feel free to move. if its not against the building code to go more than one story who cares wow they look like small hotels... whats next small casinos thats not true at all. a massive house in the middle of simple small homes is not always an improvement. its a distraction and an eyesore in many areas. it looks out of place. yeah thats horrible...... see in the neighborhood where my place is in maryland people buy the small house and they put up a second floor or add on in some way. and yeah its a change to the neighborhood and it looks out of place but its their land. so i dont have a problem with it. besides its probably pulling my property value up. thats a double edged sword since the taxes are reassessed every three years. so ill be selling puttting together a good retirement and maybe buying some toys. and whoever buys my place will probably add on to it. oh well.... itll be theirs at that point. the mentality you display is one of i dont like what that guy did so ill petition to make a law against it. maybe we should simply outlaw assholes who figure they can control more than they own. im with max on this whole thing. while i understand the need to try to set some sort of standards in an area people always end up going too far. i live in a pud with cc and rs. the home owners association runs the deal but have the legal authority to fine you if you dont comply and place a lien if you dont pay your fine. that was ok when they had people with half a brain but the new group are idiots. i got a warning notice from them a couple of weeks ago because i left my garbage can out at the curb for pickup for 30 hours rather than the allowed 24 hours. i was out of town. next time i do such a horrible thing they said they would have to fine me. i sent the notice back to them and told them where they could put it. if you build an outbuilding or a fence even to code but dont get it approved in advance by their building committee you will get a fine until you remove it. some guy down the street painted his house a color they didnt like so they passed around a petition to add house color to their things that they need to approve. the petition didntpass and they couldnt understand why. people simply go too far. in the final analysis id rather have no codes than have to deal with the rules that fucksticks set up. just my 2 cents worth .

From : azwiley1

on jul 8 1248 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote i hate to say it again but in case you two miles and max havent figured it out you are both pissing in the wind and getting wet! wtf are you two arguing about seriously come on how does a law in az about how a walmart looks have fuck all to do with pa likewise how the fuck does a law in pa have fuck all to do with how a walmart in az looks. simple answer nothing!!! once again you are both arguing over shit that is one way in one state and trying to say that it is wrong some where else. my god! larry the moderator!!!! gbmfg!!! sorry pal i had to do it!! piss off man dont you have a pink wabbit to tourment bg i do have a rather wide assed rabbit that i have been associated with. of course he aint so pink anymore. he has been out practicing his shooting and is smudged with gunpowder. actually i think ol wide ride took his family on vacation for a bit. i know he plans on taking them to a wc his idea of a day at the beach.g. his wife demanded more than that so they are on the move. .

From : roy

door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - dont feel bad... my dealership took 9 days to replace my leaking evaporator... and that was after i told them when i scheduled the appointment that the evaporator was leaking. nothing like being proactive and making sure you have the parts in stock right come on.... thats just crazy talk. almost as good as the time my battery exploded on me and they told me theyd have to order a replacement because they didnt have one in stock. youve got 500 trucks out there on the lot and im pretty sure most of them have a battery or two in them. blank stare ahhh.... dealerships. im dreading my next appointment... cant imagine how long its going to take to repair a broken nav system. what do you figure 4 days 6 i can hardly wait... hey tom drive a few hours west and ill say i can have it fixed for ya in about 4 months. ill even spring for the white castles while ya wait... vbg denny cheapskate!! you never offered me no white castles....!! mike i aint seen you parked in front of my house yet either.... bg denny i aint seen an invite yet either!! mike i guess you got me there. ok......if youre ever in nw ohio be sure to stop in. the wcs are on me. and if you talk real nice ill even take you to ruths restaraunt for breakfast... denny .

From : azwiley1

i hate to say it again but in case you two miles and max havent figured it out you are both pissing in the wind and getting wet! wtf are you two arguing about seriously come on how does a law in az about how a walmart looks have fuck all to do with pa likewise how the fuck does a law in pa have fuck all to do with how a walmart in az looks. simple answer nothing!!! once again you are both arguing over shit that is one way in one state and trying to say that it is wrong some where else. my god! larry the moderator!!!! gbmfg!!! sorry pal i had to do it!! .

From : max dodge

i hate to say it again but in case you two miles and max havent figured it out you are both pissing in the wind and getting wet! wtf are you two arguing about seriously come on how does a law in az about how a walmart looks have fuck all to do with pa likewise how the fuck does a law in pa have fuck all to do with how a walmart in az looks. simple answer nothing!!! once again you are both arguing over shit that is one way in one state and trying to say that it is wrong some where else. my god! .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote these laws are building codes which wtf miles read the fucking words this time!!! i agree with. then you would be wrong. the laws dictating the styling of the walmart here are property codes not building codes. not in this state. the building codes in this area do not dictate the buildings elevation. they only dictate construction techniques electrical water codes etc. as a building is constructed it goes through periodic inspections from the city to see that it meets construction codes. those inspectors do not give a dang about what it looks like. not in this state. you seem to not realize the scope of building codes and property codes. you dont seem to understand that i live in another state than you do and have repeatedly described what each set of codes covers. they may be very different in your area than in mine. walmart here is facing property law issues with how their building must look not building codes. building codes here do not dictate styling color elevation etc. that would be property codes. not in this state. in maryland when the walmart deal happened it was the planning commission that dumped on walmart not the codes. yeah the commissioners said um no. seems to have worked. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : miles

on sun 08 jul 2007 164327 +0930 jmc nogroupsspam@nojodibody.homeus wrote i have the same truck and took it up to about 98mph but only once with no stumble. probably wont again though. back then before jan 07 there was no speed limit on the outback roads hereabouts. now there is. not sure why they bother its thousands literally of miles of empty roads rarely patrolled. about the only people you could give speeding tickets to is someone whos wrecked because theyve gone too fast. jmc yeah ive had the truck for 6 years and a 56000 miles and just found this out... just got into a nice flow with 3 other trucks across a dry lake bed and when i passed a slower car it cut out on me twice... good to know its not an ignition problem which is what it felt like.. otoh id much prefer the diesel type governor if i have to have one where the rpm or is limited but doesnt have the back off stumble.. mac please remove splinters before emailing .

From : roy

on sat 7 jul 2007 131213 -0500 geekboy geek@com.com wrote on jul 7 626 am mac davis mac.splint...@bajadavis.com wrote im guess its governed at least i sort of hope so... took a short road trip last week to the states and the truck cut out twice while passing other cars... felt like an ignition stumble that went away as soon as you took your foot out of it... maybe in the 95 - 100 range too busy to look mac please remove splinters before emailing thats what it sounds like mine does the same thing about 98 wow that is sad. speed limits are going up and they are cutting back on the max speeds of the vehicles. well the max speed limit in baja is 50 mph / 80 kpm but nobody pays much attention to it.. lol mac please remove splinters before emailing .

From : miles

roy wrote i take it he is saying he would not put a trucking operation a commerical business in a area zoned single family residential. thats true. but i do not think its right to allow a mega-huge elaborate 10000sf house in the middle of small 1200sf homes or vis-versa. i feel a neighborhood should have some uniformity to it. a free for all is not desirable. the way it works here is you can utilize a certain percentage of the sq. ft. of the lot for the footprint of the structure. also povides for set back and and side distances. .

From : miles

suddenly without warning mac davis exclaimed 7/7/2007 1056 pm im guess its governed at least i sort of hope so... took a short road trip last week to the states and the truck cut out twice while passing other cars... felt like an ignition stumble that went away as soon as you took your foot out of it... maybe in the 95 - 100 range too busy to look mac please remove splinters before emailing i have the same truck and took it up to about 98mph but only once with no stumble. probably wont again though. back then before jan 07 there was no speed limit on the outback roads hereabouts. now there is. not sure why they bother its thousands literally of miles of empty roads rarely patrolled. about the only people you could give speeding tickets to is someone whos wrecked because theyve gone too fast. jmc .

From : miles

max dodge wrote these laws are building codes which wtf miles read the fucking words this time!!! i agree with. then you would be wrong. the laws dictating the styling of the walmart here are property codes not building codes. the building codes in this area do not dictate the buildings elevation. they only dictate construction techniques electrical water codes etc. as a building is constructed it goes through periodic inspections from the city to see that it meets construction codes. those inspectors do not give a dang about what it looks like. again there is a difference between building and property code. you seem to not realize the scope of building codes and property codes. they may be very different in your area than in mine. walmart here is facing property law issues with how their building must look not building codes. building codes here do not dictate styling color elevation etc. that would be property codes. .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote why is a uniform neighborhood desireable you are aware are you not that many neighborhoods that were built before the tract housing boom are far from uniform im not referring to the all look alike tract housing. i grew up in an area where single story ranch style homes were the norm. some people lately have wanted to bull doze their home and put up a mega huge multi-story home. some nearby neighborhoods have such houses and they basically look like small hotels! they were stopped because they disrupt the uniformity of the neighborhood and make it look like something much different than why people bought there in the first place. besides in your example a 10ksf house would be an improvement to the neighborhood. thats not true at all. a massive house in the middle of simple small homes is not always an improvement. its a distraction and an eyesore in many areas. it looks out of place. .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote my neighbor in maryland built an 8 fence in a neighborhood that has no fences. no one complained and i doubt it did anything to the property value although it may have gone up due to the fence. i wasnt consulted but then it doesnt front on my property. its 60 from it since we have a 60 wide right of way between the properties. say there was no public right of way between properties. here most property boundries run right up to the neighbors. there are codes that stipulate how far back from the property line a dwelling must be but no such laws about where to place a fence. would you have minded if the fence was built right up against your property line 1 you cannot assume what others would be bothered by. this is very true and is exactly why an anything goes policy that says i dont give a damn about whether anything bothers the neighbors is a bad idea. 2 you cannot assume it would be a horrible neighborhood. thats true but the lack of any rules allows it to happen and does nothing to prevent it. the worst looking neighborhoods around here are the ones where either there are lax property laws or they are not enforced. .

From : max dodge

a city can dictate the architectural styling of a building. here in phoenix walmart wants to put up one of their super box stores. the local council has told walmart it must be built to blend in architecturally with the neighborhood and not look like a typical box store. they have laws on the books for this purpose. are these laws zoning building codes or are they property codes that you oppose these laws are building codes which wtf miles read the fucking words this time!!! i agree with. property codes are a different set of laws in this state. another place to look at is mammoth lakes california. it is a mountain resort city. all of the buildings must look somewhat rustic wood facades roofs dark colors etc. signs must be ground mounted with limits on their lighting so as not to stand out. homes must also be built with similar restrictions. a free for all no property code that policy you seem to be for would destroy such a town. again there is a difference between building and property code. building code is a good idea property code is a bad idea. get it yet -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote but it does work that way. check out the constitution sometime. i can excersize my rights are much as i wish to as long as i dont infringe on anothers rights. anyone who says differently isnt reading the words as they are written. no max. the constitution does not give you the right to do anything you please. you also seem to have a rather strange definition of whats considered infringement. you have certain rights but so do your neighbors. they have the right to not be bothered by the very things you claim a right to be able to do as you please. should we therefore not have zoning laws because they arent constitutional commercial businesses intermixed in a residential neighborhood what the heck...anything goes because you have the right to do as you please huh .

From : max dodge

something that i think everyone in here is forgetting is that laws rules regulations et all are subjective to the area county city township state that you reside in and really cant be thrown around in the manner they have been in this thread. ive consistantly referred to one document and cited its source and applicability. anyone who missed that is on their own. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author a kid squealing his tires is as are the super bass stereos. but those infractions are covered in the crimes code and the vehicle code. in sound is usually only after a certian period of time and you can squeal those tires all day on your property according to you. actually that is not a true statement tom. in cochise county of az there is absolutely no time frame governing the disturbance of ones domicile. in other words for those that have a hard time following along this means that if you and i were neighbors god forbid and it is noon you are out in your yard doing what ever i can call the cops and they will respond because you are disturbing my peace. something that i think everyone in here is forgetting is that laws rules regulations et all are subjective to the area county city township state that you reside in and really cant be thrown around in the manner they have been in this thread. .

From : max dodge

not so. you left out the part about the states ability to set laws whenever they are not prohibited in the constitution. incorrect. i mentioned many times the documentation i have that the property codes must follow certain guidleines that do not violate the individuals rights. this is backed by case law that was decided in courts that use the constitution as their foundation for interpreting law. the constitution doesnt prohibit the states from making such property laws. in fact the constitution says the states can make any laws not specifically prohibited by the constitution. false. the constitution does not allow anyone to make laws it does detail where any rights not specifically addressed by the constitution are given to the state and the individual. many people seem to think the constitution is a document that sets limitations. it does not. the constitution allows freedoms and rights. not so at all. the problem is that people who live in close proximity to each other cant agree on what is best for the neighborhood. most times they can... in this area almsot all people figure that private property includes certain rights. the only time thats not the majority opinion is when the governing body can collect funding from fines. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : max dodge

thats true. but i do not think its right to allow a mega-huge elaborate 10000sf house in the middle of small 1200sf homes or vis-versa. i feel a neighborhood should have some uniformity to it. a free for all is not desirable. why is a uniform neighborhood desireable you are aware are you not that many neighborhoods that were built before the tract housing boom are far from uniform besides in your example a 10ksf house would be an improvement to the neighborhood. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author roy wrote i take it he is saying he would not put a trucking operation a commerical business in a area zoned single family residential. thats true. but i do not think its right to allow a mega-huge elaborate 10000sf house in the middle of small 1200sf homes or vis-versa. i feel a neighborhood should have some uniformity to it. a free for all is not desirable. .

From : miles

max dodge wrote there is no prohibition but there is the direct statement that the rights not defined by the constitution belong to the people. not so. you left out the part about the states ability to set laws whenever they are not prohibited in the constitution. quite the contrary that is what the codes do. if i had defined our respective rights i would have done as the constitution does and left it wide open. the constitution doesnt prohibit the states from making such property laws. in fact the constitution says the states can make any laws not specifically prohibited by the constitution. apparently our disagreement centers on whether or not the government knows better than the individual when it comes to rights and freedom. not so at all. the problem is that people who live in close proximity to each other cant agree on what is best for the neighborhood. .

From : roy

door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - dont feel bad... my dealership took 9 days to replace my leaking evaporator... and that was after i told them when i scheduled the appointment that the evaporator was leaking. nothing like being proactive and making sure you have the parts in stock right come on.... thats just crazy talk. almost as good as the time my battery exploded on me and they told me theyd have to order a replacement because they didnt have one in stock. youve got 500 trucks out there on the lot and im pretty sure most of them have a battery or two in them. blank stare ahhh.... dealerships. im dreading my next appointment... cant imagine how long its going to take to repair a broken nav system. what do you figure 4 days 6 i can hardly wait... hey tom drive a few hours west and ill say i can have it fixed for ya in about 4 months. ill even spring for the white castles while ya wait... vbg denny cheapskate!! you never offered me no white castles....!! mike i aint seen you parked in front of my house yet either.... bg denny this is tooooooo easy!!!!!!!!!!! bfg roy i gave you the chance and you didnt take it. i guess old retired folks are slipping..... denny how about this retired folk is giving the wide ass rabbit a break. yer making it too damn easy for a cheap shot.vbg ok gimme a break.. you selling my your ar g denny .

From : miles

despite the sometimes negative comments about hybrids i recently purchased a toyota camry. didnt cost that much more that a new vw jetta tdi diesel ive been driving an 02 tdi and fuel economy so far is 36mpg town and 42 highway - exactly what my 02 jetta tdi automatic was getting. when i bought my vw tdi in 02 i looked at the prius and came close to getting one. however i liked the vw tdi better and thought it had more room especially in the trunk. i travel a lot so that was important to me. in my work ive had a chance to drive the prius some. it seemed ok but i just didnt like the size and room. the newer prius seems much nicer and but it is still a small car. i recently bought the camry hybrid for more room and comfort and have not been disappointed. it has good pickup and torque. you do get slowed down some on really long steep hills but still not bad. handling is also very good with the traction control system on the toyota. not much different than driving the non-hybrid camry sedan. it has plenty of power for passing. back seats are big enough for people to sit comfortably. toyota hybrid system and gas engine have been used for enough years to have the major bugs out. trunk is smaller than normal because of the battery but i dont find that an issue now and will just lower rear seats if i need more cargo room. many people talk about the batteries and 10 years. batteries may or may not be an issue in the future. the new camry hybrid battery is such that you can replace individual cells so expense for replacement is less. i also suspect that 10 years from now things may be different in terms of replacement and types of batteries. who knows it is always speculation. i figure you are going to pay money either for gas or for a more fuel efficient car - one or the other. i preferred to finance it in the car payment since fuel prices are not going down significantly. depending on how much you drive and cost of fuel the added cost of hybrid can be recouped through gas savings in 5-8 years. just my experience and opinions. notice i didnt say anything about saving the environment defeating global warming tree hugging etc. im definitely not in those categories! just liked the car room and savings on gas now and in the future. ive owned a number of toyotas over the years and they have all been good quality reliable and trouble free - unlike some other cars ive had. im also old enough to want my creature comforts and remember gas at 0.269 per gallon! john anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia roy .

From : max dodge

roy thought everyone should know door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - dont feel bad... my dealership took 9 days to replace my leaking evaporator... and that was after i told them when i scheduled the appointment that the evaporator was leaking. nothing like being proactive and making sure you have the parts in stock right come on.... thats just crazy talk. almost as good as the time my battery exploded on me and they told me theyd have to order a replacement because they didnt have one in stock. youve got 500 trucks out there on the lot and im pretty sure most of them have a battery or two in them. blank stare ahhh.... dealerships. im dreading my next appointment... cant imagine how long its going to take to repair a broken nav system. what do you figure 4 days 6 i can hardly wait... hey tom drive a few hours west and ill say i can have it fixed for ya in about 4 months. ill even spring for the white castles while ya wait... vbg denny cheapskate!! you never offered me no white castles....!! mike i aint seen you parked in front of my house yet either.... bg denny this is tooooooo easy!!!!!!!!!!! bfg roy i gave you the chance and you didnt take it. i guess old retired folks are slipping..... denny how about this retired folk is giving the wide ass rabbit a break. yer making it too damn easy for a cheap shot.vbg roy hasnt ever stopped you before roy it is be kind to fat rabbits week! chris .

From : tbone

roy thought everyone should know door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - dont feel bad... my dealership took 9 days to replace my leaking evaporator... and that was after i told them when i scheduled the appointment that the evaporator was leaking. nothing like being proactive and making sure you have the parts in stock right come on.... thats just crazy talk. almost as good as the time my battery exploded on me and they told me theyd have to order a replacement because they didnt have one in stock. youve got 500 trucks out there on the lot and im pretty sure most of them have a battery or two in them. blank stare ahhh.... dealerships. im dreading my next appointment... cant imagine how long its going to take to repair a broken nav system. what do you figure 4 days 6 i can hardly wait... hey tom drive a few hours west and ill say i can have it fixed for ya in about 4 months. ill even spring for the white castles while ya wait... vbg denny cheapskate!! you never offered me no white castles....!! mike i aint seen you parked in front of my house yet either.... bg denny this is tooooooo easy!!!!!!!!!!! bfg roy i gave you the chance and you didnt take it. i guess old retired folks are slipping..... denny how about this retired folk is giving the wide ass rabbit a break. yer making it too damn easy for a cheap shot.vbg roy hasnt ever stopped you before roy -- chris .

From : max dodge

on fri 6 jul 2007 171156 -0400 roy roy@fhome.net wrote anybody have any good info on them which is better and so on. would like opinion based on fact not supposition. tia roy if ya wanted an expert opinion why didnt you just email snowball directly beekeep .

From : roy

denny wrote denny thought everyone should know just trying to help a friend out and yall jump on my case... see if i ever get you a christmas present..... denny if it was going to be white castle............. *grin* oh did you know they are making a movie about you -- chris the life and times of good ole denny or revenge of the rabbit or dont piss off the bunny denny no its a white castle movie about going to the white castle restraunt....actually when i looked it up again it was made in 04 funny how i hadnt seen the preview before the other day but when i seen them i said that sounds like denny damn i feel all warm and fuzzy...you thinking about me and all.......... vbfg i hadnt heard anything about a wc movie but i dont watch tv very much at all. if you or anybody has a link to it please post it. im curious as hell about now. denny i searched and searched for clips from the classic roy and denny go to white castle and this is what i found. same thing i guess. http//www.ifilm.com/video/2639899 that looks so stupid that its gotta be good..... only the roy charactor is about 125 lbs too skinny... see! ya friggin rabbit now ya got me in this too.!! g damned straight... youre the one that started this rabbit shit several years ago... now ya gotta live with it too..... vbfg denny .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote lets assume that property value falls under the public comfort which it does not. public comfort is such things as loud noises offensive odors and the like not financial well being. actually in many areas it does. often when an area bordering a residential neighborhood the resulting court battle is centered on reduction of property values. same thing when certain businesses wish to build next to a neighborhood. they often when on the financial concerns. i am certain that court battles do occur. however you fail to mention any examples nor how those particular cases were decided. interestingly id bet the solution in many cases is to allow the homeowner to erect a 7 fence. fine. now explain how a 7 fence lowers property value any more than a 5 fence. tell me how a fence is a hazard to the public. why does it have to be a hazard to be unacceptable because the law requires it. would you like to see the documents to which i refer if it alters the basic look of the neighborhood against the cc&rs or other restrictions then it shouldnt be allowed. why 7 why 5 as to basic look wtf is that again this is not something that can be decided upon because you dont like it it has to pose a hazard to the public. how about a 20 brick fence that ok yup. how about a monstorous 3 or 4 story mega house built in the middle of simple small 1 story homes wouldnt bother me a bit. how about a mobile home complete with busted down cars out front being put up among high $ elaborate homes again the busted down cars might be proven to be a hazard to the public. the mobile home would have to fit the building code a seperate set of codes from the property codes that ive already said i agree with. it would seem that a definition of these property codes would help. max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : miles

max dodge wrote lets assume that property value falls under the public comfort which it does not. public comfort is such things as loud noises offensive odors and the like not financial well being. actually in many areas it does. often when an area bordering a residential neighborhood the resulting court battle is centered on reduction of property values. same thing when certain businesses wish to build next to a neighborhood. they often when on the financial concerns. fine. now explain how a 7 fence lowers property value any more than a 5 fence. tell me how a fence is a hazard to the public. why does it have to be a hazard to be unacceptable if it alters the basic look of the neighborhood against the cc&rs or other restrictions then it shouldnt be allowed. why 7 how about a 20 brick fence that ok how about a monstorous 3 or 4 story mega house built in the middle of simple small 1 story homes how about a mobile home complete with busted down cars out front being put up among high $ elaborate homes .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote for instance local pc requires that driveways be paved. none of us on the block have paved driveways. the borough attorney has a gravel driveway etc. enforcing that code would be unreasonable to most of those who would come under its effect. paved driveways prevent dust. it also prevents rocks from being spread out onto the roadway. with your views neighborhoods would go down the tubes with the i can do anything i want mantra. your views are also the very reason why home owner associations have been formed. i dislike them completely but they are a necessity in areas with people that have your views. would you want to live next door to someones house thats basically a dump strewn with junked cars weeds and basic filth .

From : max dodge

so are you only referring to your particular area in what you are for or against or should people be able to do as they please nationwide in all neighborhoods the document i have is specific to the commonwealth of pennsylvania. however i believe that any property owner so long as they follow the zoning codes should do as they see fit with their land where ever it may be. and its thoughts like this that created the very laws that you hate. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote actually it does. try reading the tenth amendment. the 10th simply states the powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution nor prohibited by it to the states are reserved for the states respectively or to the people. the constitution does not prohibit a state from creating cc&rs deed restrictions or zoning regulations that imposes restrictions on what you can and cant do with or on your property. my strange definition of what is in fringement is exactly what yours is using different words. my rights extend as far as your rights. so long as i do not infringe on your rights i can do as i please. true max but you seem to have defined what your rights are and what my rights are and what entails infringement and what does not. no we should therefore not have property codes because they are unlawful. show me where in the constitution it outlaws such codes. you mentioned the 10th and it certainly does not. instead it specifically gives such powers to the states for anything not specifically prohibited by the constitution elsewhere. yes anything goes on your own property so long as you follow zoning and building codes. property codes are a pile of malarky that should be done away with. so you really feel that you should be able to build any structure you want on your own property without limitation i take it he is saying he would not put a trucking operation a commerical business in a area zoned single family residential. you best become a hermit and live far away from others with that attitude! your idea of the perfect neighborhood where people can do anything they want on their property would result in a complete disorganized mess of a dump. our disagreement is with respect to what you consider infringement of rights. if the permitted use is zoned single family residental he wouldnt be converting his single family home into a 2 family house. am i correct .

From : max dodge

i know you have max but it appears that there have been arduements made about what you are citing and the basis of said arguements are codes/laws from other states. that is the point i was trying to make. certainly codes and law differ a bit. however i doubt they are so different as to be far from the case law set forth by the document i have. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author on jul 7 1202 pm max dodge max...@verizon.net wrote something that i think everyone in here is forgetting is that laws rules regulations et all are subjective to the area county city township state that you reside in and really cant be thrown around in the manner they have been in this thread. ive consistantly referred to one document and cited its source and applicability. anyone who missed that is on their own. -- max i know you have max but it appears that there have been arduements made about what you are citing and the basis of said arguements are codes/laws from other states. that is the point i was trying to make. .

From : miles

so are you only referring to your particular area in what you are for or against or should people be able to do as they please nationwide in all neighborhoods the document i have is specific to the commonwealth of pennsylvania. however i believe that any property owner so long as they follow the zoning codes should do as they see fit with their land where ever it may be. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote lets assume that property value falls under the public comfort which it does not. public comfort is such things as loud noises offensive odors and the like not financial well being. actually in many areas it does. often when an area bordering a residential neighborhood the resulting court battle is centered on reduction of property values. same thing when certain businesses wish to build next to a neighborhood. they often when on the financial concerns. i am certain that court battles do occur. however you fail to mention any examples nor how those particular cases were decided. interestingly id bet the solution in many cases is to allow the homeowner to erect a 7 fence. fine. now explain how a 7 fence lowers property value any more than a 5 fence. tell me how a fence is a hazard to the public. why does it have to be a hazard to be unacceptable because the law requires it. would you like to see the documents to which i refer if it alters the basic look of the neighborhood against the cc&rs or other restrictions then it shouldnt be allowed. why 7 why 5 as to basic look wtf is that again this is not something that can be decided upon because you dont like it it has to pose a hazar

From : azwiley1

door that has been failing and is becoming a somewhat common issue. now its a matter of waiting until thursday to get me in. - dont feel bad... my dealership took 9 days to replace my leaking evaporator... and that was after i told them when i scheduled the appointment that the evaporator was leaking. nothing like being proactive and making sure you have the parts in stock right come on.... thats just crazy talk. almost as good as the time my battery exploded on me and they told me theyd have to order a replacement because they didnt have one in stock. youve got 500 trucks out there on the lot and im pretty sure most of them have a battery or two in them. blank stare ahhh.... dealerships. im dreading my next appointment... cant imagine how long its going to take to repair a broken nav system. what do you figure 4 days 6 i can hardly wait... hey tom drive a few hours west and ill say i can have it fixed for ya in about 4 months. ill even spring for the white castles while ya wait... vbg denny cheapskate!! you never offered me no white castles....!! mike i aint seen you parked in front of my house yet either.... bg denny this is tooooooo easy!!!!!!!!!!! bfg roy i gave you the chance and you didnt take it. i guess old retired folks are slipping..... denny how about this retired folk is giving the wide ass rabbit a break. yer making it too damn easy for a cheap shot.vbg roy .

From : max dodge

the public. how about a 20 brick fence that ok yup. how about a monstorous 3 or 4 story mega house built in the middle of simple small 1 story homes wouldnt bother me a bit. how about a mobile home complete with busted down cars out front being put up among high $ elaborate homes again the busted down cars might be proven to be a hazard to the public. the mobile home would have to fit the building code a seperate set of codes from the property codes that ive already said i agree with. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author . 222 337136 6iuji.434352$za5.367533@fe15.phx max dodge wrote actually it does. try reading the tenth amendment. the 10th simply states the powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution nor prohibited by it to the states are reserved for the states respectively or to the people. the constitution does not prohibit a state from creating cc&rs deed restrictions or zoning regulations that imposes restrictions on what you can and cant do with or on your property. my strange definition of what is in fringement is exactly what yours is using different words. my rights extend as far as your rights. so long as i do not infringe on your rights i can do as i please. true max but you seem to have defined what your rights are and what my rights are and what entails infringement and what does not. no we should therefore not have property codes because they are unlawful. show me where in the constitution it outlaws such codes. you mentioned the 10th and it certainly does not. instead it specifically gives such powers to the states for anything not specifically prohibited by the constitution elsewhere. yes anything goes on your own property so long as you follow zoning and building codes. property codes are a pile of malarky that should be done away with. so you really feel that you should be able to build any structure you want on your own property without limitation you best become a hermit and live far away from others with that attitude! your idea of the perfect neighborhood where people can do anything they want on their property would result in a complete disorganized mess of a dump. our disagreement is with respect to what you consider infringement of rights. .

From : miles

denny wrote denny thought everyone should know just trying to help a friend out and yall jump on my case... see if i ever get you a christmas present..... denny if it was going to be white castle............. *grin* oh did you know they are making a movie about you -- chris the life and times of good ole denny or revenge of the rabbit or dont piss off the bunny denny no its a white castle movie about going to the white castle restraunt....actually when i looked it up again it was made in 04 funny how i hadnt seen the preview before the other day but when i seen them i said that sounds like denny damn i feel all warm and fuzzy...you thinking about me and all.......... vbfg i hadnt heard anything about a wc movie but i dont watch tv very much at all. if you or anybody has a link to it please post it. im curious as hell about now. denny i searched and searched for clips from the classic roy and denny go to white castle and this is what i found. same thing i guess. http//www.ifilm.com/video/2639899 .

From : miles

denny thought everyone should know just trying to help a friend out and yall jump on my case... see if i ever get you a christmas present..... denny if it was going to be white castle............. *grin* oh did you know they are making a movie about you -- chris the life and times of good ole denny or revenge of the rabbit or dont piss off the bunny denny no its a white castle movie about going to the white castle restraunt....actually when i looked it up again it was made in 04 funny how i hadnt seen the preview before the other day but when i seen them i said that sounds like denny damn i feel all warm and fuzzy...you thinking about me and all.......... vbfg i hadnt heard anything about a wc movie but i dont watch tv very much at all. if you or anybody has a link to it please post it. im curious as hell about now. denny .

From : miles

max dodge wrote something that i think everyone in here is forgetting is that laws rules regulations et all are subjective to the area county city township state that you reside in and really cant be thrown around in the manner they have been in this thread. ive consistantly referred to one document and cited its source and applicability. anyone who missed that is on their own. so are you only referring to your particular area in what you are for or against or should people be able to do as they please nationwide in all neighborhoods .

From : max dodge

larry the point is this property codes are chock full of stuff that isnt enforced because its an infringement of the individual rights of the property owner. for instance local pc requires that driveways be paved. none of us on the block have paved driveways. the borough attorney has a gravel driveway etc. enforcing that code would be unreasonable to most of those who would come under its effect. fact is in any example thats been discussed so far no one has found a reason beyond well its the law to claim something is illegal. further most of these things would be termed nuisances. in a five page paper litttered with court citations and case law references the commonwealth of pennsylvania through its local government commission delineates what is permissible by law to make illegal under the property code. again i have this document in pdf form if youd like to read it. the most basic requirements are that the nuisance must affect more than just one person putting it under the property codes rather than civil law. second it has to pose a hazard to the public more than just hte guy next door to be something that can be made illegal. just because a fence is 6 high doesnt mean its a hazard. just because a kenworth is a truck doesnt make it a hazard. but if the kenworth idles all night long thats disturbing the peace..... a criminal code misdemeanor. not a property code violation. property codes are duplicate laws that generally do not follow the recommendation of the state on such codes. furthermore they are randomly enforced based on complaints from one person and may not pose a hazard to the public at all. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author max i am a little confused here. i have been following the thread and i have read it all. the part that confuses me is how you can make such a stretch from something being unconstitutional such as a few rules cc&rs call them what ever honestly from reading the thread it sounds more like there are some that are unhappy about some of the things you have done maybe rightfully so maybe not but you are being to stubborn and/or pigheaded to see anything other than what you want to. .

From : azwiley1

2005 dodge ram 3500. my drivers side air vents blow cold the passenger side vents blow hot. the difference is measured as high as 30 degrees after driving for 15 miles on the interstate. before i look at it im wondering if this is a common issue without having looked at it i suspect that the vent diverter is at the evaporator and the system is low on refrigerant.......but again i havent done a thing beyond measuring the vent temps. thanks -- nathan in montana http//concealedcarryforum.com http//1911talk.com http//hipowertalk.com http//glockcarry.com http//inlinediesel.com .

From : tbone

on thu 5 jul 2007 221615 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on thu 5 jul 2007 202847 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote niped for miles. did it ever dawn on you that having owned and driven the cars you listed that i might just know how to drive at the limit of the capabilities of each one where did i say that you didnt. it still doesnt change the fact that for you the reduced traction with studded snows will seem dangerous because you push your vehicles as you put it to their limits and the reduced traction in that case will be significant. dont you think that it might transfer over to plowing snow and thus the limit of the tires as well nah probably didnt. heres a clue for you thats why i advocate the blizzak. they work. i never said that they didnt. yeah tom. once again you sure dont do the fast shoe do you lol. you would make a great democrat. oh wait. you are one. show me exactly where i said that they dont work and dont worry ill wait. as long as ive waited to find out how old you are as i thought unable to back up your own bullshit. you would make a great republican oh wait you are one. cant even be original can you tom .

From : azwiley1

on thu 05 jul 2007 181955 -0700 azwiley1 wiley156@yahoo.com wrote as usual resorting to lame insults. i guess that i really shouldnt expect any more than that when someone disagrees with you. -- a little sensitive here arent we tom i would like to know where roy insulted you too fyi you are not one to talk about how things go when some one disagrees with you. you are preaching but not living by what you preach starting to sound sort of like budd did. good analogy. .

From : miles

on thu 05 jul 2007 144540 -0500 craig c. mcraigchr@gmail.com wrote tbone wrote no dancing or finger pointing on your part. no need to you are doing more than enough of that for the both of us. cant we all just get along - or at the very least ... agree to disagree not historically. i understand your point but there really is no fun in it. i have nitto terra graplers 325/60/18. they kick the ass of any tire yall mentioned. - craig c. .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote really what sort of problems problems that create a hazard to the safety of the public feel free to make a list. remember according to the document i have the reasons must pose a risk to the general public not the guy next door and must be a problem that infringes on the public right not just the eyes. because if you built a fence too high then the neighborhoods dogs cant get over it to get to to neighbors female dog thats in heat. the result is that the entire neighbors dogs will bark all night disturbing the peace and quiet. wrong. i can do whatever the hell i like unless it infringes on someones rights. with that logic there would be few zoning laws. if it doesnt infringe then heck build whatever you want next door to who cares what. doesnt work that way max. .

From : tbone

on thu 5 jul 2007 123057 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote temper temper dude. if you were half as smart as you think that you are you would have let this drop already. i still see no valid proof backing your claims just more name calling and temper tantrums. how about just answering my question. honestly. how old are you as i suspected nothing but spin. what difference does it make other than to try and spin the point of the discussion to something else. when you have something valid to discuss i will be glad to take part in it. i think that you are a bright guy for the most part and a real debate might be fun but this is just wasting my time so im done with this thread. feel free to replay if you must. ok i will. .

From : miles

on wed 04 jul 2007 090742 -0700 miles nope@nopers.com wrote roy wrote on wed 4 jul 2007 103825 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on tue 3 jul 2007 210747 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on tue 3 jul 2007 080638 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 202653 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe you havent done very good with that either. i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. uh......maybe someone needs to let you know that this is 2007. the 70s are like 30+ years ago. technology and knowledge change snotard. at least for most of us that dont chose to live in the 70s. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. not trying to cause trouble here but you really are starting to make yourself look foolish. he never said anything about the coefficient of friction or even that the studded tires had the same wet grip as standard ones. his exact words were number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads to me and i would think to just about anyone else would see this as him saying a good balance as meaning that even though there is a traction loss with studded tires this configuration minimizes the loss of traction on wet roads for gains they provide on ice. you need to read the whole thread before you jump in and try to be the referee tom. here is what he said...... i did read the entire thread and simply didnt say anything it the first post. studed tires are good on ice. but absolutly suck on wet pavement. talk about swapping ends. never even remotely have had that problem on wet roads and i have been using them for many years. sounds like his experience and just because you probably didnt have the same doesnt make his a lie or wrong. now i have seen some studded tires that are studded all the way across the tread and i could see where those could be maybe dicey on wet roads. i use ones that have two staggered rows on each outer edge part of tires and with none in center. now here he explains how the ones he uses are not fully studded and have better traction than the ones that are and that makes perfect sense to me. rubber is a flexible product and the studs on the outside of the tread are going to have little effect on the tread in the center and unless you have some data to say that this isnt true then like i said you are making a fool out of yourself. ----------------- thesnoman.com now........talk about making yourself look foolish tom. that happens when you set yourself up to be the judge. dont do that. im simply pointing out facts and dont have the bias of hatred against snowball that you and others seem to have. what you have is the anti hero mentality tom where you just love to be the lone voice against the pack. that is just as much of a bias as anything that you claim to address. more so perhaps. lol where do you get this stuff from from you he didnt say that his studded tires were as good as conventional on wet roads only that his were not fully studded and that he never had any problems with them. sounds ok to me and definitely didnt warrant the outburst that you gave him which is why i said what i said. im not about to start an argument or even a long winded discussion over it. i simply gave an unbiased opinion on it and do with it what you will even if it means ignoring it. oh come on tom why would i ignore what you

From : max dodge

fucking old are you are you out of junior high school really. i see nothing here backing up your point and your coefficient of friction argument doesnt hold water unless you can prove that most of the tread is off of the road and most of the load is being supported by the studs. what you arent really this stupid are you i hope you are just being your usual stubborn self refusing to admit you are wrong again rather than really being serious about that argument. if you really believe that studded tires have the same road holding friction as a non studded tire..............well.......thats just plain stupid. lol i never said that it was the same and neither did snowball. how many times do you have to here that this type of studded tire is a good compromise between the gripping power of studs on ice and the loss of traction on wet roads. you do understand what compromise means...right let me explain it to you. while this type of studded tire doesnt have the same gripping power on ice as a full studded tire it also doesnt suffer as badly as a fully studded tire on wet road which is the compromise. i also said before it depends on your driving style if the reduced traction of this type of studded tire is going to adversely effect you under normal driving conditions. if you drive it like a sports car and many do then the reduced traction will probably be unacceptable and possibly dangerous but if you drive in a calm manor as in a heavy truck you will probably do just fine with them during the winter months. as for being my stubborn self and refusing to admit to error i really think that you need to take a look in the mirror this time. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving . 222 337013 468bcfab$0$4710$4c368faf@roadrunner.com roy wrote do you guys ever snip so this thread is readable! g! here ya go!! bfg .

From : miles

roy wrote dont take my word for it. look it up the info is out there. or take the idiots advice and buy yourself some studed tires. but do get back to use with what ya do put on your truck. studded tires are great if you live in an area thats mostly frozen all winter. not that many places in the usa. north dakota and parts of alaska come to mind. they are a thrill a minute in rain soaked pavement. now that i think about it i wonder how if used as the idiot suggested they would work with a abs truck. .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote and there are those of us who live in rural areas and wish to have the freedom to do as we please rather than worry about rules. sadly some idiots figure that being elected to office means making their own rules. then you need to pick a place to live where you can do as you please. moving into a neighborhood and living as you please with disregard for your neighbors isnt always a good thing. .

From : max dodge

geekboy wrote what type of software are you running that would be slow on a amd 64 3000 windows. well true but not many applications for windows require much more than an amd 64 3000. so my question is what application are you running where the the amd 64 is too slow and youre having to wait about the only application i run that the faster the better is fea analysis software. it can take hours or days to run a stress analysis. so the faster the cpu the better. normal consumer software rarely would benefit. .

From : max dodge

hello - i have a 2002 dodge ram 4.7l v8 i did the on off on off on trick with the key in the ignition and got two codes for my check engine light p0442 p1491 the first one is in my haynes manual - evap system leak monitor medium 0.40 leak detected question #1 - what does that mean i was told it is something with my fuel vapor recovery system and that it may be under a 7/70 warranty on my emissions of my dodge. anyone know question #2 - the p1491 code is not in my manual. anyone know what that code is i was told it might be a cooling fan fuse. thanks for any help brian .

From : max dodge

thats a slightly different situation. its one thing to create rules and regs for a section of housing then advertise those regs as part of the deal. it is entirely another to enact codes that are restrictions of freedom that is already enjoyed by citizens and property owners. did i miss this situation in the other thread i guess i dunno.... if so any use of a property that was in effect prior to the implementation of zoning laws is grandfathered and exempt. max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : max dodge

chris thompson wrote big al thought everyone should know is their a way to enable the high idle through the cruse controls on a 07 5.9 ctd 6 speed on an 04 it has to see the automatic in park to work. will not work on an 04 six speed according to my dealer. mine does go into high idle if its cold and it idles a while. al 04 six speed a while back ken posted a clutch switch kit issued by cummins/mopar that would allow the 6 speed to use the high idle feature. later today if i get time ill search the archives and see if i cant find that information. i figured it out it on a post for dtr http//www.dieseltruckresource.com/dev/showthread.phpt=125804&highlight=6+speed+high+idle here it is if anyone else is intrested .

From : miles

on tue 3 jul 2007 080638 -0400 tbone tbonenospam@nc.rr.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 202653 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe you havent done very good with that either. i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. uh......maybe someone needs to let you know that this is 2007. the 70s are like 30+ years ago. technology and knowledge change snotard. at least for most of us that dont chose to live in the 70s. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. not trying to cause trouble here but you really are starting to make yourself look foolish. he never said anything about the coefficient of friction or even that the studded tires had the same wet grip as standard ones. his exact words were number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads to me and i would think to just about anyone else would see this as him saying a good balance as meaning that even though there is a traction loss with studded tires this configuration minimizes the loss of traction on wet roads for gains they provide on ice. you need to read the whole thread before you jump in and try to be the referee tom. here is what he said...... i did read the entire thread and simply didnt say anything it the first post. studed tires are good on ice. but absolutly suck on wet pavement. talk about swapping ends. never even remotely have had that problem on wet roads and i have been using them for many years. sounds like his experience and just because you probably didnt have the same doesnt make his a lie or wrong. now i have seen some studded tires that are studded all the way across the tread and i could see where those could be maybe dicey on wet roads. i use ones that have two staggered rows on each outer edge part of tires and with none in center. now here he explains how the ones he uses are not fully studded and have better traction than the ones that are and that makes perfect sense to me. rubber is a flexible product and the studs on the outside of the tread are going to have little effect on the tread in the center and unless you have some data to say that this isnt true then like i said you are making a fool out of yourself. ----------------- thesnoman.com now........talk about making yourself look foolish tom. that happens when you set yourself up to be the judge. dont do that. im simply pointing out facts and dont have the bias of hatred against snowball that you and others seem to have. he didnt say that his studded tires were as good as conventional on wet roads only that his were not fully studded and that he never had any problems with them. sounds ok to me and definitely didnt warrant the outburst that you gave him which is why i said what i said. im not about to start an argument or even a long winded discussion over it. i simply gave an unbiased opinion on it and do with it what you will even if it means ignoring it. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : roy

max we can dance all night. the zoning is to protect the majority of people from the actions of a few ass holes like the guy who wants to a motorcycle repair shop between two houses in a residential zoned area and have it open until 11pm. the example above isnt property codes but instead is zoning codes. i agree with the intent of the zoning codes which is to seperate manufacturing residential business and agriculture. the fence bit is there to prevent people from doing just what i said. a guy placed 75 roll off dumpsters around the majority of his property and called it a fence because he was pissed at one of his neighbors. clearly its not a fence. however the fence restrictions of the property code make no sense when two people agree on a fences construction and dimensions. thus the fence restrictions do not address some asshole with dumpsters and a vendetta but reasonable individuals who merely desire privacy. now wtf is going to buy a house thats back yard abuts a row of 30 foot grenn blue and black dumpsters complete with lettering. who knows. i just watched a guy offer just under the asking price on a house next to a dog kennel. this guy maintained that it was a fence to him you can go on all night about a individuals property right if ya want but when a owners actions have a detrimental impact with regard to others property that is where zoning law comes in. in the case you mention it makes sense. however it makes no sense if both individuals decide that the fence is acceptable. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author a flat out lie. in my world a fence is a fence no matter its height. in your world the government determines its height or its not allowed to be a fence. you have yet to address the issue... why is a 5 fence allowed but a 7 fence is not what is a fence what is constructed of again not the issue. your failure to address the issue is disappointing. next question why is a fence agreed upon by the property owners on each side of said fence not agreed upon by the government the answers should be based upon logic and reason not because the government said so. last i checked that sort of logic works on 5 year olds but not so much on adult citizens of a free country. well the answer is that it is law and enforcable. what is the reason behind the law not because it says so. so the very reasons i say are bullshit are why you left yet youll stand by the laws as reasonable and enforceable. ok..... yes they are enforcable. do i think they are reasonable no in most cases yes in a few. nuisance laws are enforcable only if written properly and most are not. property codes are a violation of private individuals rights given that they have no basis in fact but in what is offensive such as the last foot of a 6 fence. max we can dance all night. the zoning is to protect the majority of people from the actions of a few ass holes like the guy who wants to a motorcycle repair shop between two houses in a residential zoned area and have it open until 11pm. the fence bit is there to prevent people from doing just what i said. a guy placed 75 roll off dumpsters around the majority of his property and called it a fence because he was pissed at one of his neighbors. now wtf is going to buy a house thats back yard abuts a row of 30 foot grenn blue and black dumpsters complete with lettering. this guy maintained that it was a fence to him you can go on all night about a individuals property right if ya want but when a owners actions have a detrimental impact with regard to others property that is where zoning law comes in. max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : roy

if so any use of a property that was in effect prior to the implementation of zoning laws is grandfathered and exempt. i believe miles point was that in certain instances developments were being built with specific rules that went beyond what i believe to be constitutional. in these developments the rules stood legal challenge because they were put into effect as part of the neighborhood and the individual retained the right to live elsewhere. in the case of the borough we have the right to appeal any decision made. the question i have and will use if the need arises is if the property codes are so important then why arent all of them enforced all the time i have a copy here and i can find at least five fairly quickly that have never been enforced. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author thats a slightly different situation. its one thing to create rules and regs for a section of housing then advertise those regs as part of the deal. it is entirely another to enact codes that are restrictions of freedom that is already enjoyed by citizens and property owners. did i miss this situation in the other thread i guess i dunno.... if so any use of a property that was in effect prior to the implementation of zoning laws is grandfathered and exempt. max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : roy

yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. not trying to cause trouble here but you really are starting to make yourself look foolish. he never said anything about the coefficient of friction or even that the studded tires had the same wet grip as standard ones. his exact words were number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads to me and i would think to just about anyone else would see this as him saying a good balance as meaning that even though there is a traction loss with studded tires this configuration minimizes the loss of traction on wet roads for gains they provide on ice. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving . 222 336947 776b5$468a388e$a228ec5d$26019@alltel.net big al thought everyone should know is their a way to enable the high idle through the cruse controls on a 07 5.9 ctd 6 speed on an 04 it has to see the automatic in park to work. will not work on an 04 six speed according to my dealer. mine does go into high idle if its cold and it idles a while. al 04 six speed a while back ken posted a clutch switch kit issued by cummins/mopar that would allow the 6 speed to use the high idle feature. later today if i get time ill search the archives and see if i cant find that information. -- chris .

From : roy

on mon 02 jul 2007 233302 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 202653 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe you havent done very good with that either. why because i do not buy into yours and others bs and ego trips i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. uh......maybe someone needs to let you know that this is 2007. the 70s are like 30+ years ago. technology and knowledge change snotard. at least for most of us that dont chose to live in the 70s. gee no kidding what does the year have to do with this what worked in snow and ice then will work today as we are not talking anything here that would change that. yes there are bliizaak tires today i have tried them and while they are better than street tires in ice studs are better. also on car and engine techology has changed but only it its controls not its theory and operational physics. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. so.........you are saying that the coefficient of friction is the same for an all rubber tire and one with 15 or 16 studs size of them of course my brilliant friend if that is the case my instructors at the northwestern university school of accident reconstruction totally fucked up their class. either that or you are totally fucked up. and as for being an expert............what constitutes an expert if i could testify in court as an expert would that suffice if so then you are fucked snotard. but i am sure that you will once again run away and hide moron. the only moron here is you. if it does not meet with your appproval you resort to name calling. sure the studs make it not the most fuel efficent tires but it will use less fuel with studs on a 2wd than a 4x4 without them and the 2wd with studs will outperform the 4x4 without them on ice by a wide margin. so what is your point none as usual other than you have to come out of your troll cave for a bit and beat on your chest and thump the ground for a bit and make yourself known. knock yourself out. ----------------- thesnoman.com .

From : max dodge

max dodge wrote thats a slightly different situation. its one thing to create rules and regs for a section of housing then advertise those regs as part of the deal. it is entirely another to enact codes that are restrictions of freedom that is already enjoyed by citizens and property owners. thats true. ill agree with you in the case where laws are changed for an existing neighborhood and those restrictions are different than areas in the same region. .

From : miles

robert francis wrote actually the ballast should be centred over the rear axle not behind it. whys that placed behind the rear axle itll leverage a bit of weight off the front axle and add more than its own weight to the rear axle. because that leverage also acts as a lever to pull the rear end around the front of the vehicle in a turn and taking weight off of the front tires does not always help the situation especially when attempting to turn in slippery conditions. yup. the only time you want weight behind the rear end is for compensatory weight like when you have a plow up front. i cant argue that a few hundred pounds of weight doesnt make a big difference but the best thing you can do is get a good set of tires and not bias ply tires either. radials are much better in snow and ice. i run a set of revos year round and they do a great job plowing. they aint worth a shit in slimy mud tho... denny .

From : max dodge

thanks for your help. i have a rule that if it takes longer to fix it than to drop it off and get it back i consider letting them do it. or if i dislike the job for some reason. i will call my local mechanic and see what he says. christophers dodge world is not that far away. charles denny wrote charles thought everyone should know i forgot to mention it is the 6-speed manual. charles wrote i have a 2001 dodge ram 2500 cummins td quad cab long bed and drove to fairplay co from golden co using the cruise control a week ago friday. i stopped at a friends house and when i left the air bag light came on intermittently at first then it was on contstantly. on monday we headed back to golden and when i push the cruise control switch it does not come on. no light and no cruise control. not sure if they are related. does anyone have any advice on getting these fixed is either a dealer only item i tried to check the airbag fuses but they are locked in and wont come out. i turned off the passenger air bag and the light still comes on. this truck has about 110 k miles and is a pretty basic truck. vinyl floor crank windows but it does have a/c and cruise control. come to think of it i need to recharge the a/c about twice a year and the previous owner 2 years ago had the system fixed and rechaged. any constructive advice would be appreciated. thanks in advance charles sounds to me like the clockspring went bad. common problem but the repair requires removing the steering wheel and drivers side air bag. -- chris sounds like chris is spot-on with this info. this is not a difficult repair but if you do it yourself just make sure you unhook the battery negative cable for two minutes before you unhook the airbag. we dont like things to go boom in our face..... denny .

From : roy

i forgot to mention it is the 6-speed manual. charles wrote i have a 2001 dodge ram 2500 cummins td quad cab long bed and drove to fairplay co from golden co using the cruise control a week ago friday. i stopped at a friends house and when i left the air bag light came on intermittently at first then it was on contstantly. on monday we headed back to golden and when i push the cruise control switch it does not come on. no light and no cruise control. not sure if they are related. does anyone have any advice on getting these fixed is either a dealer only item i tried to check the airbag fuses but they are locked in and wont come out. i turned off the passenger air bag and the light still comes on. this truck has about 110 k miles and is a pretty basic truck. vinyl floor crank windows but it does have a/c and cruise control. come to think of it i need to recharge the a/c about twice a year and the previous owner 2 years ago had the system fixed and rechaged. any constructive advice would be appreciated. thanks in advance charles .

From : roy

damn larry snip some of the bs will ya! g no way that would be the logical thing to do. regards my new best friend ya wanna bet sombody just reinvented himself i dont have much time to play you want him if not maybe theguy hes always looking for some entertainment. nah sorry dont want anything to do with it/him/her/she-male. .

From : max dodge

trailer brakes maybe i bought it pretty basic no pwr windows or locks no tilt steering or cruise control. got the quad cab and 4x4 instead. theres a blueish-gray wire tied up and laying next to the battery for *some* future use i suppose. anyone know what this is for gj .

From : roy

i bought it pretty basic no pwr windows or locks no tilt steering or cruise control. got the quad cab and 4x4 instead. theres a blueish-gray wire tied up and laying next to the battery for *some* future use i suppose. anyone know what this is for gj .

From : Annonymous

jmc thought everyone should know suddenly without warning chris thompson exclaimed 7/2/2007 213 am craig c. thought everyone should know chris thompson wrote man they just dont build them like they used to do they i mean shoot only 7 years out of this one case the power supply for my amd 1100 went south need i say it buy a mac ... you wont have these problems. - craig c. mac!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pppppppppppppppffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttt im sticking with kde besides i have a new powersupply and purdy case = ill give you props on unix though... p my case is purdy too! http//www.jodi.ws/blog/2005/06/i-feel-like-i-have-brand-new-computer.html jmc much nicer than mine p of course i was coming from a basic cheapo case so just about anything is better than the old one = -- chris .

From : max dodge

on mon 2 jul 2007 161657 -0400 roy roy@fhome.net wrote on jul 2 735 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote read more - hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - roy it appears that you have a new friend/stalker. damn larry snip some of the bs will ya! g regards my new best friend ya wanna bet sombody just reinvented himself i dont have much time to play you want him if not maybe theguy hes always looking for some entertainment. thanks. ill see if hell come out and play. .

From : max dodge

on jul 1 1243 pm chris thompson kf4drr-no-sp...@windstream.net wrote im sticking with kde besides i have a new powersupply and purdy case = ill give you props on unix though... p you may want to learn from a longer post on 2 jul in the group computer tech support entitled power supply keeps blowing. major difference exist between supplies. some benchmarks for identifying inferior supplies are provided. .

From : max dodge

but the truck is operated as a commericial business. is commericial business permitted in a residential area so lets get this straight.... the cable guy comes home in the company truck but nothing is said. the electric company tech comes home in the compay vehicle and nothing is said. dad did it for years nobody said a thing. but the second the company vehicle is a kenworth its a problem i could see it if the guy dragged all manner of trailers into a residential district operation or if he allowed it to idle for long periods of time operation or if he made excessive noise at inappropriate times operation but the mere presence is what is against code. thats bullshit. again the presence of a kenworth isnt the problem its the operation of said vehicle that is the problem. in this scenario if it were a gun wed agree that the mere presence of a gun is not a problem. how that gun is used is the problem. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author .

From : azwiley1

on mon 2 jul 2007 102502 -0400 bill bargerw@bellsouth.net wrote trailer brakes maybe i bought it pretty basic no pwr windows or locks no tilt steering or cruise control. got the quad cab and 4x4 instead. theres a blueish-gray wire tied up and laying next to the battery for *some* future use i suppose. anyone know what this is for gj i just had the dealership put one of their factory receiver hitches on with 4 and 6 prong connections. so no it must be something else. im thinking it has something to do with one of the features of the power package security cruise pwr windows and locks that funky green rearview bright-light blocker thing etc. that i dont have installed. gj .

From : roy

on mon 02 jul 2007 193054 gmt theguy@whatever.net wrote you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. make what go away you maybe i have lived with and used them for many years on and off since 70s and i know them well. as i have said i have seen tires that are studded all the way across the tread years ago cosco in mt used to stock them but i have never used that style not would i recommand it unless you are in snow and ice all the time. number15 or 16 studs size of them just on edges of tires is a staggered patern is a good balance between traction on ice and wet roads and you would know this to if you really knew what you were talking about rather than maybe reading a thing or two and calling yourself a expert. ----------------- thesnoman.com .

From : Annonymous

if youre down with this socialist bullshit roll your ass to china and leave us the fuck out of it. you told your whole story with your addy but having none you dont know how to spell balls fucking hold my hand the world is too big and mean yankee. not really dick breath im in fl. i smell tuna... nope thats just roy the pussy! wrong again! what you smell is your wife tell her to clean up. .

From : azwiley1

on mon 02 jul 2007 182434 gmt snoman admin@snoman.com wrote on mon 2 jul 2007 110009 -0400 roy roy@fhome.net wrote studed tires are good on ice. but absolutly suck on wet pavement. talk about swapping ends. never even remotely have had that problem on wet roads and i have been using them for many years. now i have seen some studded tires that are studded all the way across the tread and i could see where those could be maybe dicey on wet roads. i use ones that have two staggered rows on each outer edge part of tires and with none in center. ----------------- thesnoman.com you cant even begin to make this go away snotroll. studs definately change the amount of friction available on the raod surface over a non studded tire. the tire manufacturers the stud man. and all of the safety information talk about that all of the time. .

From : Annonymous

on jul 2 735 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote and how exactly are they going to work if there is no method to enforce anything there is a method to enforce the codes; the problem is what the codes prohibit. i agree but you have a very narrow definition of public welfare. my definition comes straight from pa state commission on local government. as i said i have the document if youd like to read it. and what exactly is the public right i would say that a group makes = it public over individual. this makes it a public right interference with a public right is unreasonable when the conduct involves a significant interference with the publics safety the public peace the public comfort or the public convenience... and once again fuzzy as ever not you - the law. not really. its intentionally done because it eliminates the action of making something illegal simply because one individual or a group do not like it. thus if my neighbor parks his kenworth in his driveway overnight it should be legal for him

From : roy

on sun 01 jul 2007 210415 -0700 miles nope@nopers.com wrote chris thompson wrote you know im glad to hear that someone up north has been choosing 2wd over 4wd because they felt they didnt need 4wd. ive always been of the opinion that if its too slick for a properly set up 2wd then its too slick for 4wd. at some point stopping is going to be a factor. id much rather drive a 4wd on snow packed roads. i agree that 4wd does not help stopping. but it does improve handling. most vehicles ive seen slid off the road were not trying to stop. chains on all 4 wheels ballast in the rear limited slip differential etc. will allow a 2wd to perform fairly well on snow but 4wd will do even better. i have a 89 4x4 burb that i bought new loaded with every option and 4x4 drive but i can honestly tell you that there has only been a hand full of times that i needed 4x4 drive in it to get around and it hasbeen in some pretty serious snow out west. i can remember only once that i needed it in snow and that was on a forest trail in winter and that trip is a story of its own with some weight in the rear and good tires and a smart driver a 2wd can surprize you. my wife drive a 2wd cherokke with a 4 banger and a stick that we bught new in 2000 as a daily commuter. during the winter i run studded snow tires on the rear and the vehicle does a great job in snow and ice. one of her freinds at work traded a minivan for a grand cherrokee several years ago and first winter with it put it in the ditch trying to comute in 4x4 on icy roads thinks they were invincible. they traded it off the next summer and went back to a front wheel drive. more than one person at her job scratches their head at how she seems to do better than them in 2wd on bad roads. not sure if studs are ablicable here but when you run them on rear ther is not tendancy to spin out and suddenly trade ends on even the slickest roads. very predictable. i run a set of 4 of them on my plow trucks in winter. ----------------- thesnoman.com .

From : roy

and how exactly are they going to work if there is no method to enforce anything there is a method to enforce the codes; the problem is what the codes prohibit. i agree but you have a very narrow definition of public welfare. my definition comes straight from pa state commission on local government. as i said i have the document if youd like to read it. and what exactly is the public right i would say that a group makes it public over individual. this makes it a public right interference with a public right is unreasonable when the conduct involves a significant interference with the publics safety the public peace the public comfort or the public convenience... and once again fuzzy as ever not you - the law. not really. its intentionally done because it eliminates the action of making something illegal simply because one individual or a group do not like it. thus if my neighbor parks his kenworth in his driveway overnight it should be legal for him to do so. the guidleines are such that the borough cannot pass a law against him doing so unless the kenworth poses a violation of one of the above. in this case that would be a matter of how its operated not just its existance. however the law in many case

From : max dodge

robert francis wrote actually the ballast should be centred over the rear axle not behind it. whys that placed behind the rear axle itll leverage a bit of weight off the front axle and add more than its own weight to the rear axle. .

From : roy

it depends on the snowfall you receive. we receive heavy/wet snowfall due to lake effect from the great lakes. we can get stretches of bad weather with 4 to 6 inches of snow each day. weve had both a 2wd and 4wd. we prefer the 4wd. .

From : tbone

suddenly without warning miles exclaimed 7/1/2007 1150 pm balsofsteele@gmail.com wrote generally when i see psu failures these days its either due to the psu being a complete piece of shit from the get-go powmax ftw! or its starting to eat capacitors. the era that system was made we saw tons of rapidly failing capacitors being soldered into everything including psus and mobos. several years ago there were major issues with inferior motherboard capacitors. several employees from a major capacitor factory left and started their own company. their capacitors were much cheaper so many motherboard manufactures switched to them. often these new cheap caps failed in only 1 or 2 years. msi asus abit and others all used these cheap caps and suffered the consequences. yuppers. my otherwise worthy asus board suffered from weird usb issues throughout its life. no *visible* damage to caps but as it came from that era im pretty sure they were marginal on my board. just replaced it with another asus an m2n-sli-deluxe plus a dual-core amd 64 x2 5600+ 4mb ram and between internal and external about 1.4tb of hd space. didnt have to replace the psu though coolermaster its still sound. new system kicks butt though especially since i upgraded from a mere amd 64 3000+ w/1gb ram. im pleasantly surprised there seems to be as many geeks in here as mechanics. guess i shouldnt be since the skillset/interests are definitely related! im a geek that can sometimes fix my truck rather than a mechanic that can fix a computer though jmc .

From : azwiley1

if it is a violation of a zoning law or restriction then the use that is in violation should be pursued by the zoning authority. in ma it is the city govt. and exactly why would say... a 6 fence be violation of a zoning code where a 511 fence is not if two adjacent neighbors feel that a 7 fence between their two properties is ok who is the government to step in and make a case out of it again zoning should be a means for two individuals to find an equitable solution not a means for government to step in and persecute the individual. btw dont confuse property codes with building codes. while i find some of the building codes a bit stifling they are generally written with the cause of public safety and welfare in mind. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author why do you smell bs because property codes should inherently be a method for two individuals to settle a disagreement. codes should not be a way for government to restrict the use of private property. if it is a violation of a zoning law or restriction then the use that is in violation should be pursued by the zoning authority. in ma it is the city govt. .

From : roy

man they just dont build them like they used to do they i mean shoot only 7 years out of this one case the power supply for my amd 1100 went south so i decided to buy a new power supply and case as the old case was short on a few features i wanted mainly the front usb but to my dismay when the hardware was transferred from one case to the next i suffered a file corruption that affected apt-get needless to say after much effort for all practical purposes the linux system was stuck as was. no new software oh well time to reload. i almost forgot how much fun it was to reload a system because of a hardware failure. thankfully it hasnt taken much to get back to where i was. just a few bugs to iron out. well i guess thats the end of my little rant. -- chris .

From : max dodge

robert francis thought everyone should know actually the ballast should be centred over the rear axle not behind it. get a set four of dedicated good winter tires and you should be fine. ive driven in canadian winters for almost 30 years and only recently bought a 4x4. never felt i needed it. the only reason i got the 4wd was because i couldnt find a 2 wheeler with a manual trans. bob you know im glad to hear that someone up north has been choosing 2wd over 4wd because they felt they didnt need 4wd. ive always been of the opinion that if its too slick for a properly set up 2wd then its too slick for 4wd. at some point stopping is going to be a factor. -- chris .

From : roy

balsofsteele@gmail.com wrote generally when i see psu failures these days its either due to the psu being a complete piece of shit from the get-go powmax ftw! or its starting to eat capacitors. the era that system was made we saw tons of rapidly failing capacitors being soldered into everything including psus and mobos. several years ago there were major issues with inferior motherboard capacitors. several employees from a major capacitor factory left and started their own company. their capacitors were much cheaper so many motherboard manufactures switched to them. often these new cheap caps failed in only 1 or 2 years. msi asus abit and others all used these cheap caps and suffered the consequences. .

From : roy

on jun 30 1233 pm roy r...@fhome.net wrote on jun 30 913 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote on jun 29 840 pm bill p. y...@yahoo.com wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - what about that punk kid with the rolling boombox you know the one that goes down the street at 5am or midnite when famlies are sleeping. or the punk kids racing down a 35 mph road at 60 or 70 in their ricers with the loud exhaust. when ya stop and think about it when you were 20 you were probably doing things that pissed people off as well. shit!! your pissing people off here ! gbmfg why are you getting on the guess about their exhaust and defending the others i bet you are one of this kids with a rolling boombox with the loud exhaust that races down the street arent you. those kids are the ones that need to grow up not the other way around. those kids were never taught the mean of respect which is why they do what they do. i would rather have a cummins crank over ar 5 am then have to be woken up by so asshole sitting out there going boom boom boom. how about you how about your family how do you feel when your little ones get woken up by that type of shit from some 20 year old asshole kid that is trying to be cool- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - actually in my case when i was 20 my ass was deployed to a combat zone. hell you were old then! by the time i was 20 i had been there done that was out of the hosp and was having a ball.vbg man sometimes i feel as old as say you! lol ask me if i care anymore you do. only toward some. .

From : max dodge

why do you smell bs because property codes should inherently be a method for two individuals to settle a disagreement. codes should not be a way for government to restrict the use of private property. if it is a violation of a zoning law or restriction then the use that is in violation should be pursued by the zoning authority. in ma it is the city govt. .

From : azwiley1

on jun 30 913 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote on jun 29 840 pm bill p. y...@yahoo.com wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - what about that punk kid with the rolling boombox you know the one that goes down the street at 5am or midnite when famlies are sleeping. or the punk kids racing down a 35 mph road at 60 or 70 in their ricers with the loud exhaust. when ya stop and think about it when you were 20 you were probably doing things that pissed people off as well. shit!! your pissing people off here ! gbmfg why are you getting on the guess about their exhaust and defending the others i bet you are one of this kids with a rolling boombox with the loud exhaust that races down the street arent you. those kids are the ones that need to grow up not the other way around. those kids were never taught the mean of respect which is why they do what they do. i would rather have a cummins crank over ar 5 am then have to be woken up by so asshole sitting out there going boom boom boom. how about you how about your family how do you feel when your little ones get woken up by that type of shit from some 20 year old asshole kid that is trying to be cool- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - actually in my case when i was 20 my ass was deployed to a combat zone. hell you were old then! by the time i was 20 i had been there done that was out of the hosp and was having a ball.vbg ask me if i care anymore you do. .

From : azwiley1

yeah its something to do with verizons server. i had been direct to their server now after a massive problem on their part and a tech line that has less of a clue im now posting to a server that sends to verizon. at some point ill figure it out again... -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author i see you have that double post problem again. isnt that a pita. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. lets see the neighbor uses his property to gain access to her garage. but he wants to use his private property to store his private possession and its illegal so the neighbor complains to the government rather than politely asking for a compromise i smell bullshit. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. which is far better than their te

From : bill p

on thu 28 jun 2007 202339 -0500 mike simmons mikesim@yhti.net wrote use the turningsignal.com domain name for your website today! uhhh... no thanks.... is heatedleatherseats.com available mike no but dontcalluswellcallyoudimbo.com is .

From : tbone

why do you smell bs because property codes should inherently be a method for two individuals to settle a disagreement. codes should not be a way for government to restrict the use of private property. however as you mention codes are used to restrict silly things like boats motorhomes fence height etc. i can see where property codes might be beneficial if the public welfare is at risk. in fact pa law says exactly that. i have a pdf of the pa general assembly local government commission nuisance law framework if youd like to take a look. it basically states that the legislature cannot make something a nuisance just because they do not like it. it has to interfere with the public right interference with a public right is unreasonable when the conduct involves a significant interference with the publics safety the public peace the public comfort or the public convenience... also the law differentiates between a condition that is an infringement on the public right and one that infringes on an individuals right. this documant does not address infringement on an individuals right. i suspect that when private infringement is the case it becomes a matter of civil law rather than property code. thus my claim of bullshit. in the case here an individual was offended by a trailer which presented no other hazard than one of convenience lost. rather than pursue private action she invoked public code. that in and of itself is bullshit. next the public code forbids something that does not constitute a public hazard. yet it is illegal. thats bullshit. thus i smell bullshit. please explain how one has anything to do with the other. as for the asshole with the 10000 watt subwoofers i can see to a point making that assholes drive as uncomfortable as he is making others with noise pollution but smoging someone out for no other reason but jealousy is just being an ignorant asshole and as they say what comes around goes around. the point was not one of who was more deserving but one of why complain about one offensive act when both actions are offensive. iow each individual is as likely to commit an act that is found offensive yet the reply only addressed one act. i watched a bmw driver play games at an intersection aggressively showing that she would make a left turn in front of me but failing to do so because she was waiting for cross traffic. after three demonstrations which put her well into the intersection while she waited for one more car i made the right and she then followed. at such time as i stopped to back into my driveway to the left of the roadway she then attempted to drive into the right side of my truck. this after i had stopped all traffic made clear my intent to make a left turn further made clear by blocking the entire road for all of 5 seconds. she apparently had too much money and not enough time. it was fairly ironic that she wouldnt make a left turn into traffic waiting several minutes for sporadic traffic but would in turn come close to ramming my truck because i cost her 5 seconds. imo she deserves the smoke. whats the matter max some of these code pissing you off while i agree with the feeling some of these codes are unfortunately necessary in many communities. wrong. in fact as my document demonstrates they are unconstitutional at least in this state. not everyone gives a damn about the rights of others as seen in this very thread and because of this some rules need to be placed to retain the rights of the majority to maintain their property values. property value is determined by the buyer not the camper sitting in the driveway nextdoor. civil law covers the possible infringement of private rights. in a perfect world your property value would not be affected by what your neighbors are doing but this simply isnt true. you could take a lot of pride in the way your property looks and take great care to keep it looking its best and the same could be true for most of your neighbors and the property values should reflect that so a camper isnt a problem because its likely to be well kept just as the house. yet some places forbid them. but all it takes is one asshole that doesnt give a shit and never cuts the lawn the house looks abandoned and the yard is full of junk cars and garbage and then your property value isnt worth a whole lot more than the crap house because nobody wants to live near or next door to that. yes but... what you refer to isnt just a private infringement. if it can be proven that the house hosts vermin or otherwise presents a hazard it can be dealt with by the governing body. i dont have a problem with that. sometimes associations get a little carried away with these restrictions and that is unfortunate but even there if people get involved then that can be changed as well. in my case the borough tried to enforce a junk vehicle ordinance against me by claiming that a ve

From : max dodge

on jun 30 913 am roy r...@fhome.net wrote on jun 29 840 pm bill p. y...@yahoo.com wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - what about that punk kid with the rolling boombox you know the one that goes down the street at 5am or midnite when famlies are sleeping. or the punk kids racing down a 35 mph road at 60 or 70 in their ricers with the loud exhaust. when ya stop and think about it when you were 20 you were probably doing things that pissed people off as well. shit!! your pissing people off here ! gbmfg why are you getting on the guess about their exhaust and defending the others i bet you are one of this kids with a rolling boombox with the loud exhaust that races down the street arent you. those kids are the ones that need to grow up not the other way around. those kids were never taught the mean of respect which is why they do what they do. i would rather have a cummins crank over ar 5 am then have to be woken up by so asshole sitting out there going boom boom boom. how about you how about your family how do you feel when your little ones get woken up by that type of shit from some 20 year old asshole kid that is trying to be cool- hide quoted text - - show quoted text -- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - actually in my case when i was 20 my ass was deployed to a combat zone. ask me if i care anymore .

From : roy

people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. lets see the neighbor uses his property to gain access to her garage. but he wants to use his private property to store his private possession and its illegal so the neighbor complains to the government rather than politely asking for a compromise i smell bullshit. why do you smell bs there can be some restrictions that prevent the storage of huge objects on a property especially if the properties are small. where i lived in nj you could keep a boat on your property but it had to be kept out of site and behind a fence which translated into not keeping a large boat on a very small property. how do you know if she talked to him first or not i dont recall him saying either way. he could always park a car or erect a small decorative structure to prevent her from using his property which will not disturb his other neighbors like endlessly idling his engine early in the morning. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. which is far better than their terrible driving and arrogant manners behind the wheel right please explain how one has anything to do with the other. as for the asshole with the 10000 watt subwoofers i can see to a point making that assholes drive as uncomfortable as he is making others with noise pollution but smoging someone out for no other reason but jealousy is just being an ignorant asshole and as they say what comes around goes around. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. seems like a perfect time to mention to those of you who think codes that take away property rights are ok to shuit the hell up and leave right of ownership alone. whats the matter max some of these code pissing you off while i agree with the feeling some of these codes are unfortunately necessary in many communities. not everyone gives a damn about the rights of others as seen in this very thread and because of this some rules need to be placed to retain the rights of the majority to maintain their property values. in a perfect world your property value would not be affected by what your neighbors are doing but this simply isnt true. you could take a lot of pride in the way your property looks and take great care to keep it looking its best and the same could be true for most of your neighbors and the property values should reflect that but all it takes is one asshole that doesnt give a shit and never cuts the lawn the house looks abandoned and the yard is full of junk cars and garbage and then your property value isnt worth a whole lot more than the crap house because nobody wants to live near or next door to that. sometimes associations get a little carried away with these restrictions and that is unfortunate but even there if people get involved then that can be changed as well. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving .

From : tbone

behind the wheel right you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. seems like a perfect time to mention to those of you who think codes that take away property rights are ok to shuit the hell up and leave right of ownership alone. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c. . 222 336858 46868113$0$24715$4c368faf@roadrunner.com on jun 29 840 pm bill p. y...@yahoo.com wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - what about that punk kid with the rolling boombox you know the one that goes down the street at 5am or midnite when famlies are sleeping. or the punk kids racing down a 35 mph road at 60 or 70 in their ricers with the loud exhaust. when ya stop and think about it when you were 20 you were probably doing things that pissed people off as well. shit!! your pissing people off here ! gbmfg why are you getting on the guess about their exhaust and defending the others i bet you are one of this kids with a rolling boombox with the loud exhaust that races down the street arent you. those kids are the ones that need to grow up not the other way around. those kids were never taught the mean of respect which is why they do what they do. i would rather have a cummins crank over ar 5 am then have to be woken up by so asshole sitting out there going boom boom boom. how about you how about your family how do you feel when your little ones get woken up by that type of shit from some 20 year old asshole kid that is trying to be cool .

From : azwiley1

on jun 30 725 am max dodge max...@verizon.net wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. lets see the neighbor uses his property to gain access to her garage. but he wants to use his private property to store his private possession and its illegal so the neighbor complains to the government rather than politely asking for a compromise i smell bullshit. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. which is far better than their terrible driving and arrogant manners behind the wheel right you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. seems like a perfect time to mention to those of you who think codes that take away property rights are ok to shuit the hell up and leave right of ownership alone. -- max joinwww.devilbrad.comand find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - max it appears you have a stutter .

From : max dodge

i see you have that double post problem again. isnt that a pita. -- if at first you dont succeed youre not cut out for skydiving people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. lets see the neighbor uses his property to gain access to her garage. but he wants to use his private property to store his private possession and its illegal so the neighbor complains to the government rather than politely asking for a compromise i smell bullshit. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. which is far better than their terrible driving and arrogant manners behind the wheel right you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. seems like a perfect time to mention to those of you who think codes that take away property rights are ok to shuit the hell up and leave right of ownership alone. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c. .

From : max dodge

on jun 29 840 pm bill p. y...@yahoo.com wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c.- hide quoted text - - show quoted text - what about that punk kid with the rolling boombox you know the one that goes down the street at 5am or midnite when famlies are sleeping. or the punk kids racing down a 35 mph road at 60 or 70 in their ricers with the loud exhaust. why are you getting on the guess about their exhaust and defending the others i bet you are one of this kids with a rolling boombox with the loud exhaust that races down the street arent you. those kids are the ones that need to grow up not the other way around. those kids were never taught the mean of respect which is why they do what they do. i would rather have a cummins crank over ar 5 am then have to be woken up by so asshole sitting out there going boom boom boom. how about you how about your family how do you feel when your little ones get woken up by that type of shit from some 20 year old asshole kid that is trying to be cool .

From : craig c

people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. lets see the neighbor uses his property to gain access to her garage. but he wants to use his private property to store his private possession and its illegal so the neighbor complains to the government rather than politely asking for a compromise i smell bullshit. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. which is far better than their terrible driving and arrogant manners behind the wheel right you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. seems like a perfect time to mention to those of you who think codes that take away property rights are ok to shuit the hell up and leave right of ownership alone. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c. .

From : fmb

bill p. wrote people like you guys are flaming assholes. lets see you violate codes a neighbor complains so you harrass her. another doesnt like someones lifestyle or car so smokes them out with his exhaust. you are doing wonders for public acceptance of diesel vehicles. is your truck your phallic symbol do everyone a favor and grow up. you better hope i dont catch you at a light with your windows down. craig c. .

From : brian

i just bought this truck..really impressed being a gm gas guzzler owner before. i am planning on towing a 5th wheel rv trailer and have a question on the proper use of the automatic transmission. i did not get a manual with the truck and havent got one from the dealer yet but am going out tonight with the trailer for the weekend. shoud i tow with overdrive off or does it matter with the gm i towed it in 3rd without o/d otherwise it would cook the tranny......damn expensive lesson..... the tailer loaded is approx 7000 lbs. any helpful hints would be appreciated....smart remarks are also useful. when you have the time consider a fuel pressure gauge. some 03s had issues with the lift pump on the back of the fuel filter housing going out and supplying 0psi to the expensive pump. the expensive pump soon dies leaving you on the side of the road. consider upgrading your fuel pump with a walbro. loads of info from dtr and you can purchase their glacier kit if you are so inclined. i was and did. http//www.dieseltruckresource.com/dev/index.php fmb 03 ho qc 6sp 4wd lb leaving in the morning with my first wife and an arctic fox 24-5n for a week of r&r .

From : craig c

robc@robcoleman.ca wrote i just bought this truck..really impressed being a gm gas guzzler owner before. i am planning on towing a 5th wheel rv trailer and have a question on the proper use of the automatic transmission. i did not get a manual with the truck and havent got one from the dealer yet but am going out tonight with the trailer for the weekend. shoud i tow with overdrive off or does it matter with the gm i towed it in 3rd without o/d otherwise it would cook the tranny......damn expensive lesson..... the tailer loaded is approx 7000 lbs. any helpful hints would be appreciated....smart remarks are also useful. my nosey neighbor complained about me having my rv on my property cause it impacted her ability to get into her garage....seems she likes to drive across the corner of my lot...which brought the city down on me and made me store the rv off-site......the sound of the diesel warming up sufficiently lol at 600am is my consolation prize....wish it was noiser. i would suggest using the tow/haul button if you have it it will keep it in 3rd until you need 4 .

From : bb

pete wrote on wed 23 may 2007 061058 -0400 mpberti mpberi@ec.rr.com wrote nosey wrote mpberti wrote nosey wrote jeff gagnon wrote gas war a gas war idea that will work---- this was originally sent by a retired coca cola executive. it came from one of his engineer buddies who retired from halliburton. its worthy of your consideration 8--- it wont work. http//www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/gasout.asp ive been boycotting exxon-mobil for years. the only thing ill buy from them is mobil 1 sys motor oilbecause its made form soybeans not crude. exxon is evil. lets bring them down!!!!!!!!!!!!! synthetic soybeans yep i dont think so... bullshit mobil 1 is made form soybeans so is amsoil castrol syntec is not. cite please. ken .

From : craig c

bb wrote him. i rolled my windows up cranked up the cummins and revved it up a bit. poor old mr boom box had to roll his windows up also. bummer. thats great. i like to do the same thing to high maintenance north dallas women in their bmw mercedes or saab convertibles. optimal placement is for their front bumper to be lined up with my passenger rear tire at a stop light. rev it up a little watch the horrid look smile big and say to myself its gonna be a good day tater. craig c. .

From : max dodge

the 10th simply states the powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution nor prohibited by it to the states are reserved for the states respectively or to the people. the constitution does not prohibit a state from creating cc&rs deed restrictions or zoning regulations that imposes restrictions on what you can and cant do with or on your property. there is no prohibition but there is the direct statement that the rights not defined by the constitution belong to the people. true max but you seem to have defined what your rights are and what my rights are and what entails infringement and what does not. quite the contrary that is what the codes do. if i had defined our respective rights i would have done as the constitution does and left it wide open. show me where in the constitution it outlaws such codes. you mentioned the 10th and it certainly does not. instead it specifically gives such powers to the states for anything not specifically prohibited by the constitution elsewhere. ill do one better ill show you a document that is based on case law which is based on constitutional law thus proving that my assertions are not only true but tested by due process of law. let me know when you wish to

From : miles

so you really feel that you should be able to build any structure you want on your own property without limitation again that is building codes and as i stated when discussing with roy i agree that building codes are a necessity. you best become a hermit and live far away from others with that attitude! your idea of the perfect neighborhood where people can do anything they want on their property would result in a complete disorganized mess of a dump. our disagreement is with respect to what you consider infringement of rights. apparently our disagreement centers on whether or not the government knows better than the individual when it comes to rights and freedom. you prefer that the government determine that sort of thing for you while i prefer to determine that for myself. -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author . 222 337156 jdji.83752$s57.60651@fe07.phx max dodge wrote building codes are that set of regulations that determine how a building may be constructed with regard to materials and standards for structure electrical plumbing and waste. a city can dictate the architectural styling of a building. here in phoenix walmart wants to put up one of their super box stores. the local council has told walmart it must be built to blend in architecturally with the neighborhood and not look like a typical box store. they have laws on the books for this purpose. are these laws zoning building codes or are they property codes that you oppose another place to look at is mammoth lakes california. it is a mountain resort city. all of the buildings must look somewhat rustic wood facades roofs dark colors etc. signs must be ground mounted with limits on their lighting so as not to stand out. homes must also be built with similar restrictions. a free for all no property code that policy you seem to be for would destroy such a town. .