2002 dodge 1500 4.7 l oil spraying all over Please help!!!

From : brad amy

Q: max dodge wrote none of those are british and none are actually inferior. gm has just had to pay a huge sum to fiat to get out of a contract it could not afford. have you any experience of those cars millions of satisfied customers run them and i have just bought my first fiat recently to go with my year old range rover and eight year old land cruiser. i am very satisfied with all of them. fiat was owned by the italian governement fiat is owned by the agnelli family and it is almost bigger than the italian state. it owns many mutinational brands like casenewholland cnh which have a big us presence. likewise renault by the french. the french government have no more than a 16% shareholding in renault while renault has a substantial holding in nissan. using either as an example of free market business is moot. i do have experience with these cars in the states. fiat was generally not able to take the pounding of distance driving renault was impossible to fix due to propriatary and french governmental restrictions on parts and peugot simply werent numerous enough to bother with. very few us cars can cut it in europe either. only chrysler/jeep really have any presence here. others have tried and failed due to poor quality and dynamics. chrysler is controlled by german daimler anyhow. oh yes and bmw x5 and mercedes m are american built and sell in considerable numbers here but they are hardly representative of the rest of the crap produced. in any case the build quality of my mclass was appaling and worse than any european car i have had since a ford fiesta of 1977. actually my particular m was assembled in austria and was better built than most of the petrol american built ones. apparently the new models are much improved in all respects. fiat is a family owned business and neither of the others are government owned so i am not sure what you are on about. false. both fiat and renault were owned at some point by the governemnts of their respective origin. well that is a symptom of a socialist phase that europe went through. it is a historical anachronism which has not been true for many years. fiat has recently been in financial trouble but nothing like the problems at ford and gm. in fact gm had a contract to buy fiat which they had to buy themselves out of last year. it is part of the reason gm are in the pickle they are in. there is much cross polination between the brands and fiat supply many diesel engines to gm europe while they now build a small car to be branded as a ford as well as a fiat. fiat also build cars and supply engines for suzuki of japan. did i say that no. but it is evident that some posters here do not wish it to be a free market when they are less competitive only when they come out top. rather hypocritical dont you think not at all. i am very pleased with the position in which dc has placed itself particularly the chrysler division. it is notable that dc and chrysler in particular are well off financially doing more business than previous years and having a better balanced line of product. this is not a coincidence. further i am not complaining about free market economy nor am i complaining about foreign vehicles cruising our highways. indeed i believe competition makes for a better vehicle. however as i stated in my original reply the op wasnt worried about company profit or quality but the fact that dc vehicles were heavy and thus less efficient than other brands. somehow even though i pointed it out you missed that in the original post. most cars are built heavier due to the equipment fitted and improved safety standards. the mercedes brand has always made heavier cars than bmw for instance but it is all relitive. their small cars are lighter than their big cars while a variety of engines are available for each model. if lightness is your thing they produce the smart car which is as small and light as anyone could wish. the us government is sticking to free market principles in this case they dont always thinking of steel but it is a few posters here that are arguing that they should put up the shutters. i am saying that it will do them more harm than good. no argument here. however their reply isnt particularly about the companies but the welfare of the nation as a whole. the welfare of the nation is tied absolutely to the profitability success and expansion of its companies. not of a particular company but of all the companies that employ the population that makes a nation. not making sense to you great neither does your essay. then you have a problem. are you a street sweeper or the office coffee maker by any chance the problem is obviously on your end where you think that such jobs would render someone unable to see through your inept reply. then it is an indictment of your promotion system that you may have or have not got h

Replies:

From : roy

jd wrote ...apathy and ignorance. its not that were apathetic and ignorant. its that we dont care and dont know. bill putney to reply by e-mail replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter x .