1998 Dakota Instrument Panel Bulb Test

From : edward g kinezian

Q: but the similarities are spooky. indeed. however if memroy serves 1904 was a pretty spooky year as well ... and here we are. this year will pass like all others before. craig c. .

Replies:

From : tom lawrence

simmons mikesim@yhti.net wrote not to be nosey bu how would you know vbg budd his wife told me! ;^ mike wait a minute. you aint never talked to my wife....... or have you denny of course how else would i know that your nickname is minuteman vbg mike the chinese word for minuteman is cumtoosoon dale .

From : nosey

a computerized overly complicated overly expensive way of injecting water into the intake flow. i see no verifcation of his 70 mpg claim nor any proof that he knows anything about combustion physics thermal dynamics fuel manufacture .. . .no evidence hes anything but a charlatain. how does water injection help it allows a much leaner mixture by moderating the combustion process and preventing lean mixture detonation problems. it was commonly used in ww ii on many of our fighters to give higher power outputs under combat conditions. the moisture also flashes into low pressure steam to add to the power output. in 1970 mother earth magazine ran an article on how to build your own water injection system with an aquarium air stone a mayonaise jar and some vacuum line. add water and rubbing alcohol. on a 225 slant six in a 1964 valiant i got 41.25 mpg on a 145 mile round trip between canon city co and colorado springs co. the engine was running tighter than stock valve lashes mechanical lifters and a recurved distributor. otoh my eldest is now driving my old 1979 d150 318auto 3.55 axle long bed and getting 19 mpg around town and 23 highway but the vacuum advance has been seriously recurved. it also kicks 350 chubbie butt regularly. now what all this points out is there is no miracle carburetor only careful tuneups and modifictions combined with sensible driving habits aggressive driving is a no-no for fuel economy folks will achieve a net increase in economy. budd budd i see no proof that you read the article. did you read it not that i know anything about it but its not water injection like they used in ww2 when we were kids. can you prove the 318 kicks 350 chubbie butt i went to the 50th anniversary of the first nuke in a friends 350 powered 1/2 ton short bed with a aluminum shell. we got just over 25 mpg for the complete trip. i think it was throttle body injected but did not look. it was dead stock automatic trans and the paint was blowing off the hood just like both of my white dodges al al im not known for lying. i resent your insinuation that i am. the bad part is i tried to help you with your rat infestation. therefore i will not waste the effort in the future as you will just consider im lying. and i wasnt born until 47. budd budd didnt want to upset you sorry i did. noticed you didnt answer the question. did you read the article al still has a rat problem you insinuated i didnt read it. if youd read my post a little more closely you would have seen i touched on the most obvious benefit of the design which would show i did in fact read the article. his system entrains a small amount of water in the gasoline flow. if he gets a smooth engine operation from this then it alone is a little bit amazing. and you didnt read the suggestion i made for taking care of the rats or disbelieved it. the soda is safe for grandkids pets and farm animals unlike poisons. obviously the traps didnt work . . . . budd .