07 seat
From : north80
Q: just put on about 4000 mile on a 07 dodge love the truck but does any one else seem to get a sore after about 3 hours.. .
Replies:
From : 9dodgefan
on mar 27 948 pm north80 nort...@canoemail.comm wrote just put on about 4000 mile on a 07 dodge love the truck but does any one else seem to get a sore after about 3 hours.. yeah dude you wouldnt believe how sore my left earlobe gets after a few hours in my truck too. wait you did mean earlobe when you said a sore right .
From : Annonymous
on 29 mar 2007 171011 -0700 9dodgefan sepiaricus@hotmail.com wrote on mar 27 948 pm north80 nort...@canoemail.comm wrote just put on about 4000 mile on a 07 dodge love the truck but does any one else seem to get a sore after about 3 hours.. yeah dude you wouldnt believe how sore my left earlobe gets after a few hours in my truck too. wait you did mean earlobe when you said a sore right yes he did im sure but everybody should know your earlobe has to become accustomed to your new truck. .
From : stormin mormon
on mar 30 437 am nosey kfre...@removethis.hotmail.com wrote whatever how so very insightful of you. ken you going to let him insult you like that bg i usually let insults like that slide. has anyone heard from budd lately -- ken nope not a peep. ive emailed him several times in the last week and it keeps bouncing back...like he doesnt have internet or has changed his isp. hope nothing bad has happened.. do you have his phone number perhaps give him a call. hes where moab roy denny .
From : stormin mormon
as i said this is all about *my* backyard. ive been a full time resident of the north slope for several years and as is not uncommon here i am well aware of what the oil industry is doing. it is a perspective that you do not come close to matching. bullshit. you may be able to actually see the equipment but the reports you read are the same ones i can read. now i repeat would you like to debate the points ive made or your proximity to large oil drilling equipment -- max join www.devilbrad.com and find out what free exchange of info is all about. there are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty soap ballot jury and ammo. please use in that order. -ed howdershelt author max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote max dodge max340@verizon.net wrote well floyd what youve got is about 9 years old. i read in several newer and what ive got is the *only* such estimate. there are no others. you are making up statistics. im sorry floyd but thats incorrect. sorry but you are clueless. what i said is *precisely* correct. http//www.doi.gov//030312.htm cites 10 billion + did you read what i said did you read what you are quoting the usgs estimates that it contains a mean expected value of 10.4 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil. so you cite an example of *exactly* what i told you. of course it isnt surprising when you cite a department of the interior webpage to find that they are using doi resourse... which is the usgs. and as i pointed out technically recoverable oil includes oil that would cost $2000/bbl to extract. and the quote of 10.4 billion barrels is *not* for the 1002 area of anwr but for the entire north eastern section of alaska that the 1998 usgs study covered. since it is going to fly right over your head let me point out that gail norton was caught *lying* to congress about anwr and made every attempt at dishonest distortions. the article you cite is a gail norton distortion. you fell for it hook line and sinker. congress didnt! here is the data from the department of the interiors usgs report || volume of oil in part of study area || millions of barrels || f95 mean f05 ------------------------------||--------------------------- entire assessment area1 || 5724 10360 15955 1002 area of anwr || 4254 7668 11799 deformed area || 3403 6420 10224 undeformed area || 0 1248 3185 1 includes 1002 area shown on figure 2 native landsr and adjacent state water areas within 3-mile boundary see fig. 2. table 1 estimates of volumes of technically recoverable oil in various parts of anwr assessemnt study area. so what your cite does is simply verify *precisely* what i had told you. people who are dishonest try to distort the facts from the usgs report. http//www.anwr.org/backgrnd/potent.html claims 4.8 billion to 29.4 billion depending on source of information they cite. http//www.anwr.org/features/pdfs/anwrestimates.pdf puts the mean recoverable at 18 billion depending on technology. whatever source arctic power cites 1 they *all* trace back to exactly one source the usgs report that i provided for you and 2 is almost certainly going to be a distortion given that arctic power the owner of anwr.org is a political propaganda machine paid for by the republican legislature in alaska and intended to lobby for opening anwr. they are to put it mildly the absolute least reliable source of information available about anwr. the second cite you give above is on of the most grossly ridiculous papers on anwr that exists. it basically says the usgs estimates are off by a factor of more than 2. it bases that on how oil extraction technology improved from 1968 to 1995 and says that will be repeated in the next decade specifically for anwr. see above about how arctic power lacks integrity! as i pointed out to you previously in place is a figure with no merit at all because it includes oil that cant be extracted at any cost. doi estimates that in-place resources range from 4.8 billion to 29.4 billion barrels of oil there is the exact text from your cite. the data is totally worthless. note that the very next sentence which you apparently ignored said recoverable oil estimates ranges from 600 million barrels at the low end to 9.2 billion barrels at the high end. that of course is the technically recoverable oil and is according to the 1988 report which the 1998 report totally contradicted saying where the above oil was expected to be there is probably only 1.2 billion barrels see the above table under undeformed area. the paragraph following the one quoted above references the 1998 report that ive been explaining to you. hence your newer information is actually the older information... again you have demonstrated that the distortions and lies that i said are
From : jasper
just put on about 4000 mile on a 07 dodge love the truck but does any one else seem to get a sore after about 3 hours.. take that fat cash stuffed wallet out of your back pocket and you will be amazed at how much better a firm seat will feel to your and lower back! .