03 Dak 3.9L : front coolant leak..
From : marc
Q: ok mr. leatherneck! how are the heated seats lol btw.. my step daughter made it home safe and sound. now my cousin damn jarhead is deploying for his third rotation damn shame of it is that he goes out on or about christmas day. smile when you say jarhead wiley! mike on sat 9 dec 2006 162127 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 130259 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 085659 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote im sure most of you have read or heard of the study and recommendations about our policy in iraq. what do you think that gw will do regarding the recommendations contained in the study i think he will puss out and do what ever he can at this point to make sure he does not look like a failure. he could care less about what really needs to be done he does not have the ability to do it right and he is going to fail. probably right............however the american people have to take their share of the blame for this. the media coverage in this country is very liberal. not trying to sound like budd.......just sayin. the enemy knows that they can beat us in the press. look at the coverage. our us losses have been statistically very low but every single casualty appears on the front page of every paper. the president whoever it is.......repub or demo.........has to run his agenda for the papers.........not for what it right. the will of americans in general is very low. bonus question do you feel that iraq has fallen into a civil war with the exception of saddam it always has been a civil war and will be that way long after we pull out and move on. iraq will end up being just like bosnia/yugo and vietnam if we dont lobby our congressmen and senators to do what is right. how many more us service members need to die for something that we really have no reason to be involved in the war on terror ha we will not catch osama because they will not let us and even if we did the war on terror is a farse and will not end because there will always be terrorist. you could not be more wrong. the war on terror is very real and as i said before............americans need to realize this and develop the will to win the war on terror. yugo bosnia iraq........they are all our neighbors now. this is a very global world america is very affected by what happens in those countries. having said that......i probably agree with you that our strategy of fighting this war is pretty poorly laid out. im not sure that iraq was the head of the terrorist movement as much as bush wanted to make it an example to the others of the military ability of the us. bad move. i think iran saudi and pakistan may be where the real issues develop. im not sure that force is right way to win this war either.........certainly not as a sole strategy. but if you dont think that terrorism is a threat to the us........you are very wrong. the world has slowly been turning more extremist and terrorism is the tool of the extremists. there will always be terrorists but that is not a reason to condone it or to allow it to continue. there will always be murders too. there will always be death too. we dont just dont accept that without raising any effort to stem the tide. i agree the war on terro is real i dont think i said anything other. though i do think it is just an excuss at times for bush to justify his doings. however do you really think that catch osama will stop it dont put words in my mouth. i dont remember even mentionng osama. he is a pretty small cog in this whole thing. i really dont care if they catch him or not. no you didnt i did in my original post maybe you need to read it again i dont some one else will take over and may be a lot worse. sort of like the worries of what will happen in n. korea when kim il kicks the bucket and his son takes over who happens to be a bigger extremist then his old man. i dont condone it anymore then i condone the continuation of illegal immigation! thats a whole other animal. different discussion-no relevance to this one. but just about anyone can see that we will esspecially when the us ends up doing it alone never be able to stop it. lets look back at yugo. i agree that molosevek sp was wrong and agree with us going in there to stop him. however when the country split for the reasons that it did how did this because something that we had to stay there for and deal with we are becoming a world police force and that is not what the military is for. i agree that it is not what the military is trained for if that is what you mean. if something were to happen on our soil right now we could not defend ourself! that is wrong! what next do we go back in to mogodishu because they are fighting again im sorry but i think we need to pick what we get in
Replies:
From : brian
you top posted shame on ya!g tell your step daughter welcome home! and thanks for doing what she does. tell your cousin to keep his damn head down! roy what ever! wtf is he taliking about what did i miss i think at least from what i gathered from the long winded netnannyish type post that he is bothered by the fact that i top posted the btw comments about my step daughter and cousin. when someone types an email message the information is turned into electronic code. the smallest unit of information is a byte. a thousand bytes is a kilobyte like a thousand grams is a kilogram. and a million bytes is a mb and a billion bytes is a gigabyte or gb. when an emailer leaves the old text on the bottom the message takes up more. more what well more time to squeeze the message through the telephone wire. more down load time. because the computer had to get in effect three or four messages through the phone wire. your new message plus the other messages that you left in the email. when computers were first connected to each other it was often a long distance call to get the messages. so leaving an old message on the bottom was incredibly bad manners -- because it cost the other guys on the list money to send the old message through the phone wire. and in the early days it was a near certainty that anyone who left old text in a message would be criticized by others who had to pay long distance to download the old text. its still bad manners because it still takes time to send the messages. and it takes up more space on everyones computer. 36 kb is thirty six thousand bytes of information space. and when you send an email to a mailing list everyone on the mailing list has to download the large message. some people do have fast intenet service. fast or slow the 36 kb message still takes up 36000 bits of information on everyone elses computer. or at least everyone who is on the email list and got your message. so what to do about it the polite thing to do is when you reply to scroll down into the message. click the mouse pointer some where in the old text and drag the pointer down to the bottom of the message. a bunch of old text will highlight change color or might turn into reverse -- white type on a colored background. then press the delete key and the highlighted text will disappear. do this as many times as needed to remove all the old text from previous messages. on some email programs you can hold the left click down and slide the pointer off the bottom of the email window. and it will continue to highlight more and more text. well cant you just read the message at the top sure. after my dialup connection very slowly downloads your couple words plus all the old text from earlier emails. and then i get to store your couple of words plus all the earlier messages. please leave enough of the old message so that we know what is the question you are answering. but highlight and delete any old text that isnt needed to make the point. christopher a. young learn more about jesus www.lds.org www.mormons.com . btw.. my step daughter made it home safe and sound. now my cousin damn jarhead is deploying for his third rotation damn shame of it is that he goes out on or about christmas day. on sat 9 dec 2006 162127 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 130259 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 085659 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote im sure most of you have read or heard of the study and recommendations about our policy in iraq. what do you think that gw will do regarding the recommendations contained in the study i think he will puss out and do what ever he can at this point to make sure he does not look like a failure. he could care less about what really needs to be done he does not have the ability to do it right and he is going to fail. probably right............however the american people have to take their share of the blame for this. the media coverage in this country is very liberal. not trying to sound like budd.......just sayin. the enemy knows that they can beat us in the press. look at the coverage. our us losses have been statistically very low but every single casualty appears on the front page of every paper. the president whoever it is.......repub or demo.........has to run his agenda for the papers.........not for what it right. the will of americans in general is very low. bonus question do you feel that iraq has fallen into a civil war with the exception of saddam it always has been a civil war and will be that way long after we pull out and move on. iraq will end up being just like bosnia/yugo and vietnam if we dont lobby our congressmen and senators to do what is right. how many more us service members need to die for something that we really have no reason to be involved in t
From : chris thompson
nospam@alltel.net says... i would suspect water pump. theres a weep hole in the bottom of the pump. look at the bottom of the pump to see if thats where its coming from. well checked the hoses and it seems ok due to the pulley i cant see the hole but the area on the bottom of the wp where it bolts to the timing cover was slightly wet this am. directly below that joint is the harmonic balancer and it had a nice big drop of orange coolant hanging from it too this morning. .
From : marc
what ever! when someone types an email message the information is turned into electronic code. the smallest unit of information is a byte. a thousand bytes is a kilobyte like a thousand grams is a kilogram. and a million bytes is a mb and a billion bytes is a gigabyte or gb. when an emailer leaves the old text on the bottom the message takes up more. more what well more time to squeeze the message through the telephone wire. more down load time. because the computer had to get in effect three or four messages through the phone wire. your new message plus the other messages that you left in the email. when computers were first connected to each other it was often a long distance call to get the messages. so leaving an old message on the bottom was incredibly bad manners -- because it cost the other guys on the list money to send the old message through the phone wire. and in the early days it was a near certainty that anyone who left old text in a message would be criticized by others who had to pay long distance to download the old text. its still bad manners because it still takes time to send the messages. and it takes up more space on everyones computer. 36 kb is thirty six thousand bytes of information space. and when you send an email to a mailing list everyone on the mailing list has to download the large message. some people do have fast intenet service. fast or slow the 36 kb message still takes up 36000 bits of information on everyone elses computer. or at least everyone who is on the email list and got your message. so what to do about it the polite thing to do is when you reply to scroll down into the message. click the mouse pointer some where in the old text and drag the pointer down to the bottom of the message. a bunch of old text will highlight change color or might turn into reverse -- white type on a colored background. then press the delete key and the highlighted text will disappear. do this as many times as needed to remove all the old text from previous messages. on some email programs you can hold the left click down and slide the pointer off the bottom of the email window. and it will continue to highlight more and more text. well cant you just read the message at the top sure. after my dialup connection very slowly downloads your couple words plus all the old text from earlier emails. and then i get to store your couple of words plus all the earlier messages. please leave enough of the old message so that we know what is the question you are answering. but highlight and delete any old text that isnt needed to make the point. christopher a. young learn more about jesus www.lds.org www.mormons.com . btw.. my step daughter made it home safe and sound. now my cousin damn jarhead is deploying for his third rotation damn shame of it is that he goes out on or about christmas day. on sat 9 dec 2006 162127 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 130259 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote on sat 9 dec 2006 085659 -0700 azwiley1 azwiley1@cox.net wrote im sure most of you have read or heard of the study and recommendations about our policy in iraq. what do you think that gw will do regarding the recommendations contained in the study i think he will puss out and do what ever he can at this point to make sure he does not look like a failure. he could care less about what really needs to be done he does not have the ability to do it right and he is going to fail. probably right............however the american people have to take their share of the blame for this. the media coverage in this country is very liberal. not trying to sound like budd.......just sayin. the enemy knows that they can beat us in the press. look at the coverage. our us losses have been statistically very low but every single casualty appears on the front page of every paper. the president whoever it is.......repub or demo.........has to run his agenda for the papers.........not for what it right. the will of americans in general is very low. bonus question do you feel that iraq has fallen into a civil war with the exception of saddam it always has been a civil war and will be that way long after we pull out and move on. iraq will end up being just like bosnia/yugo and vietnam if we dont lobby our congressmen and senators to do what is right. how many more us service members need to die for something that we really have no reason to be involved in the war on terror ha we will not catch osama because they will not let us and even if we did the war on terror is a farse and will not end because there will always be terrorist. you could not be more wrong. the war on terror is very real and as i said before............americans need to realize this and develop the will to win the war on terror. yugo bosnia iraq.....